Select Committee on Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: Housing, Planning, Local Government and the Regions Written Evidence


Supplementary memorandum by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (DRA 73(a))

  Further to my appearance before the ODPM Select Committee on 14 September I am now able to provide information on the two matters on which we were asked to write.

1.  How many respondents to the White Paper Your Region: Your Choice: Revitalising the English Regions, had supported the Government's proposals for the members of elected regional assemblies to be elected by the additional member system (AMS)? [Q288]

  Of the 1,171 individual respondents to the White Paper 67 mentioned the voting system. Of these 64 expressed a firm view for or against AMS. Twenty-four favoured AMS. Of those 40 that did not favour AMS, 18 expressed a preference for the single transferable vote (STV), three for first past the post, two for a party list system, and 23 did not suggest an alternative system.

2.  Examples of local authorities using their powers to give co-opted members voting rights on scrutiny committees under the Local Government Act 2000 (as amended by the Local Government Act 2003) [Q320]

  ODPM is not aware of any local authority that has so far used its powers to give co-opted members voting rights on scrutiny committees. However authorities are not under any duty to inform us if they do choose to use such enabling powers and we, in the interests of minimising administrative burdens on local authorities, do not as a rule undertake surveys to ascertain their take up of such powers.

Richard Allan





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 5 January 2005