Select Committee on Public Accounts Minutes of Evidence


Supplementary memorandum submitted by the Home Office

Q70 (Mr Field):

    —  Birkenhead currently operate a no alcohol enforcement zone in the area of the court house. This allows a police officer if he believes that a person is or has been consuming alcohol, in the zone, to require the person not to consume alcohol and surrender any alcohol. There are no known incidents of defendants being prevented from attending the court house.

    —  However if a defendant attends court under the influence of alcohol or drugs and is disruptive, security officers can under, section 77 Criminal Justice Act 1991, exclude or remove any person from the court house, where it is reasonably necessary to do so in order to maintain order in the court house; to enable court business to be carried on without interference or delay; and to secure his or any other person's safety. At Birkenhead, when a defendant is refused entry, the information is provided to the Legal Advisor and magistrates, the defence solicitor is informed and asked to talk to the defendant. The matter of the defendant's non attendance would be brought before the bench, and the magistrates would make a decision whether to hear the matter in his absence or adjourn the matter.

    —  There is only one case of the police having to attend the court house at a request of the security officers. The defendant was arrested and charged with being drunk and disorderly.

    —  The problem of the defendant attending court under the influence of alcohol or drugs has not been reported as an issue in any other area of Merseyside.





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 16 June 2005