Select Committee on Public Accounts Twenty-Fifth Report


2  Influencing motorists' behaviour

8. The Agency could take more action to influence driver behaviour and reduce congestion. Lorries can be a particular problem, overtaking too frequently when they do not have the speed to pass, and blocking motorway and dual carriageway lanes for other users. The Agency was consulting on a possible pilot on the M42 of a dedicated lorry lane, although the Freight Transport Association and others had expressed concerns. The Agency was also working with the Road Haulage Association and the Freight Transport Association to improve driving standards and reduce the number of accidents involving lorries. The Agency also faced challenges in scheduling abnormally large or heavy loads to minimise disruption to the public and damage to the condition of the road. The Agency had been created in 1994 to build and maintain highways, and its objective was to manage safety. It had only acquired a network management role some 18 months previously, and hence it was only now beginning to change its focus.[8]

9. The Agency had recently trialled a message to drivers who stayed in the middle lane needlessly, by using its variable message signs. The initiative had received positive support from motorists but the Agency had yet to fully evaluate the impact. Short term benefits had accrued but the initiative had not changed the behaviour of a sufficient number of drivers. The Agency could not take direct action with motorists driving in the middle lane unnecessarily or too close to the car in front as these were enforcement matters, and hence the responsibility of the police.[9]

10. The Agency has not provided motorists with the information they need to make choices both before, and during, their journeys. Information for motorists planning a journey was provided on television, local radio and its internet website. More real time information was needed at the road-side, however, as motorists joined motorways for example, to warn them of congestion ahead so alternative routes could be used to minimise or avoid delay. The Agency often had to balance adding to congestion on principal routes with the risk of creating alternative congestion on local routes.[10]

11. In Paris, however, drivers are given information on how long it will take them to get from one junction to the next, and on how well the traffic is flowing. Such information clearly influences driver behaviour. The Agency did not believe there were as many opportunities to give people choices in England as in France. The Agency was nevertheless starting to provide similar advice, for example on the best way round the M25 for traffic coming down the M6. The necessary predictive technology existed and was already used to post information on the Agency's website, but further roll out of signs was needed on the roads. As part of its mission, the Agency's National Traffic Control Centre would deliver information to local television, radio and to the website. The Agency was making significant investment in enhancing the quality of its messaging to provide information on the length of delays and alternative routes.[11]

12. The provision of information to motorists at road works could be improved, particularly where speed restrictions remained in place even though no contractors were currently working at the sites and the carriageway appears to be clear. The Agency kept speed restrictions in place where cones and other materials presented a safety hazard. It acknowledged, however, that it should inform motorists where safety was the reason for the restrictions.[12]

13. The Agency does not have sufficient intelligence about planned events, such as concerts and major sporting events which can cause significant disruption and congestion. It is not therefore well prepared and able to advise on or implement traffic management measures. The Agency will be making a case to be a party to be consulted when such events are licensed.[13]


8   Qq 22-23, 30, 68 Back

9   Qq 72-73 Back

10   Qq 17-19, 25-29, 35-36, 40, 117-119 Back

11   Qq 19, 25-27, 56-59 Back

12   Qq 105-110 Back

13   C&AG's Report, para 18 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 28 June 2005