Select Committee on Public Accounts Third Report


Conclusions and recommendations


1.  By investing in Freeview, the BBC has succeeded in ensuring subscription-free access to its digital channels is available on digital terrestrial television. When ITV Digital went into administration in 2002, there was widespread uncertainty about the future of digital terrestrial television. The BBC's investment helped ensure that digital terrestrial television continued and was available subscription-free. Nearly four million homes now have Freeview.

2.  One in four households cannot get Freeview because of gaps in coverage. The gaps are due to local topographical difficulties and the need to ensure that digital signals do not interfere with analogue signals. The Freeview website and promotional literature should explain why Freeview is not currently available in some areas and the potential for future increases in coverage, depending on plans for switchover from analogue to digital television.

3.  The BBC should establish whether subscription-free satellite could satisfy in a cost-effective way the demand for its digital channels in areas where Freeview is currently unavailable. The BBC needs to identify whether there is a case for a new satellite service, which could offer near universal coverage, bearing in mind that BSkyB launched a new subscription-free satellite service in October 2004.

4.  The BBC should establish whether set-top aerials and not just roof-top aerials will be able to receive digital terrestrial television after digital switchover. Freeview is not usually available to licence-fee payers relying on set-top television aerials because digital terrestrial television signals are not strong enough. The BBC believes that after digital switchover, when the power of digital signals can be increased, digital terrestrial will work on televisions with set-top aerials. The BBC should carry out early field tests to establish whether licence fee payers will be able to use set-top aerials to receive digital terrestrial television after digital switchover.

5.  The BBC should publish value for money indicators for subscription-free digital television. Driving the market for and improving take-up of free to air digital television forms one of the BBC's key objectives. The BBC identified cost per household as a value for money measure for Freeview, but it needs to revise the take-up estimates it produced prior to launching Freeview as these have been significantly exceeded, and include the cost of increasing the coverage of digital terrestrial television.

6.  The BBC's spending is not subject to the full independent scrutiny, and accountability to Parliament, that rights of access for the Comptroller and Auditor General would provide. The interim arrangements covering the period up to 2006 are a step forward. But as we said in our response to the public consultation on the BBC Charter Review, the Committee has long pressed for the Comptroller and Auditor General to be given full rights of access to the BBC to provide full accountability to Parliament for the public money it receives. He would then be able to decide what to examine and when, on the basis of a full and independent assessment of value for money risks.

7.  The BBC's activities need to be carried out in accordance with the highest standards of probity, propriety and value for money. Under the Royal Charter the Governors must satisfy themselves that these standards are being maintained. Recognising the Governors' role, this Committee would expect to take evidence from them in its future examination of the BBC's spending, as it did in the case of Freeview.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 3 February 2005