Select Committee on Public Accounts Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 80-99)

THE ACCOUNTS OF THE DUCHIES OF CORNWALL AND LANCASTER

7 FEBRUARY 2005

  Q80  Chairman: Just summing that up. We have got a situation where you are increasing the revenue surplus, are you not, by charging the staff development cost to capital, you accept that?

  Mr Ross: Yes.

  Q81  Chairman: What is being suggested to you is you have not got a clear policy and there is scope—I am sure it does not happen—for these costs to be treated inappropriately. Would you accept that?

  Mr Ross: I do not think so. If you can tell me more?

  Q82  Chairman: There is scope. Why do you not set out your accounting policies more clearly and in more detail so you can convince committees like this, indeed, that is not happening because you are a highly reputable organisation?

  Mr Ross: We go a long way. We think the information we provide is good. This is in line with corporate account publication. We have an auditor of national reputation. It is then submitted to our own audit committee and after that it goes through the Treasury who have the right to direct any way in terms in which our accounts are presented.

  Q83  Jim Sheridan: Can I ask either or both representatives has either or both estates received any funding whatsoever from EU farm subsidies?

  Mr Clarke: As far as Lancaster is concerned, we do not farm any land in hand. All our farms are let, therefore any new subsidies are a matter between the tenant and the authorities. We do not receive any of the subsidies direct.

  Q84  Jim Sheridan: Neither estate receives any subsidies?

  Mr Clarke: I am speaking for Lancaster.

  Mr Ross: In the same way, the single farm payments are received by our tenants.

  Q85  Jim Sheridan: Just to clarify. Neither estate receives any money whatsoever from the EU in terms of farm subsidies?

  Mr Clarke: In terms of the single farm payment, no.

  Q86  Jim Sheridan: I have asked a perfectly straightforward question.

  Mr Ross: It is a matter of how you express it.

  Q87  Jim Sheridan: I tell you how I express it. We have people in the Third World dying of starvation, we have the richest land owner in this country receiving EU farm subsidies and I am asking a perfectly straightforward question, how much?

  Mr Ross: We let these businesses. We let all the farms to tenants. The tenants are individual farmers who have the right to run their business. This is the terms of the Agricultural Holdings Act. Those tenants are the people who are drawing down these single farm payments.

  Q88  Jim Sheridan: It seems to me you are refusing to answer my question, if either or both estates are receiving farm subsidies?

  Mr Ross: It does indirectly go to the tenant. You are right in the sense that it is on Duchy land, but it goes to the tenants.

  Q89  Jim Sheridan: You do get EU farm subsidies?

  Mr Ross: Not directly.

  Q90  Jim Sheridan: Indirectly?

  Mr Ross: If the tenant is carrying out business on our land and they receive a rent, and that is deemed to be indirect, the answer would be yes.

  Q91  Jim Sheridan: Have you any idea how much that is?

  Mr Ross: I am afraid we do not know because we do not know the details of all the farmers' profit and loss accounts.

  Q92  Jim Sheridan: On the question of Clarence House, which has just been refurbished at a cost, I estimate something like £9 million. Did the Duchy meet any of the costs of this refurbishment?

  Mr Ross: This is outside our area of remit completely. We hand over the surplus to the Prince of Wales and his office. The matter of how the money is spent and accounted for is not Duchy business.

  Q93  Jim Sheridan: Going back to the point which Mr Steinberg raised about the pension fund, £1.1 million deficit in the pension fund. Would it not be right and proper to ask Her Majesty to fund this deficit from the surplus?

  Mr Clarke: At the present time we are paying money into the pension scheme and that does come out of the surplus.

  Q94  Jim Sheridan: How much is that?

  Mr Clarke: At the moment we are paying £143,000 a year. We have increased the contribution to 16.3% for all members of staff within the scheme. On the deficit, on an MFR basis, we are now at 93% which is over the 90% threshold we have to achieve in 10 years and we have achieved that in three years.

  Q95  Jim Sheridan: Mr Ross, can I ask the question about this £300,000 of development work which was written off during 2002 and 2003. Can you account for why that happened?

  Mr Ross: This was a project we were taking forward with the costs being incurred on professional advice, legal advice and those sorts of issues. We decided the prospect of this particular scheme progressing in the reasonably near future was not sufficiently good for it to be held in our books, so we have written it off against the revenue account. It has been deducted from the surplus.

  Q96  Jim Sheridan: I am glad that is within your remit. Again, can I say, there was a significant difference in terms of staff costs. According to this report, one of the estates has paid something like £57,000, and the other one, something like £32,000. What kind of people do you employ that deserve these kinds of wages? Why is there such a difference in the gap?

  Mr Adcock: Can I pick up on that question. I think the £57,000 you mentioned is the Duchy of Lancaster. That £57,000 is inclusive of pension contributions, which, as Paul Clarke stated, have been inflated in 2004 because we were making additional payments, totalling £60,000, to catch up the deficits. In addition to that, the way we calculate the average salary is fairly crude, which is taken at the beginning of closing balances, which can be misleading in the timing of people beginning and starting within the year. I can say that average salary is not £57,000, it is £33,600 over the 14 people within the Duchy of Lancaster.

  Q97  Jim Sheridan: What are the skills required for these people?

  Mr Adcock: The people are split into three main areas: head office staff, survey staff and other costs, which are magistracy, shrievalty and other special costs. The head office staff is mainly finance: myself, two others, the chief executive and his secretary. Our skills are ultimately dependent on the roles we are carrying out. The survey staff skills obviously are dependent on their skills, but they are mainly surveyors.

  Mr Clarke: Because we are a small team we have a high proportion of qualified professional people. Within that survey office and survey staff, you have got two qualified chartered surveyors and two secretaries in support, plus estate workers. Whereas, at head office, I am a chartered surveyor, Mr Adcock is a chartered accountant and we have a bookkeeper accountant. There is a fairly high degree of qualified people within that group.

  Q98  Jim Sheridan: Mr Ross, I see that certain Duchy properties are used by the Prince of Wales Office and for staff living accommodation. Can you tell me how these properties are allocated and how the rents are determined?

  Mr Ross: They are occupied and rented out under the appropriate legislation with the full open market rent being paid.

  Q99  Jim Sheridan: What does that mean?

  Mr Ross: The Duchy of Cornwall owns the properties and we let them to the staff.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 28 July 2005