Select Committee on Public Accounts Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 240-259)

THE ACCOUNTS OF THE DUCHIES OF CORNWALL AND LANCASTER

7 FEBRUARY 2005

  Q240  Mr Davidson: Capital gains tax, corporation tax.

  Mr Ross: I am not in a position to be able to comment on that, simply because we do not have base values, for a start, for capital gains tax.

  Q241  Mr Davidson: So you do not buy and sell anything at all during the course of a year?

  Mr Ross: No, we do indeed.

  Q242  Mr Davidson: You must be able to assess how much the corporation and capital gains tax would have been, but you have not done so.

  Mr Ross: We do not have base values.

  Q243  Mr Davidson: Could we have a note, Chairman, on how much the Duchy of Cornwall have saved during the last year by not having paid capital gains tax and corporation tax?

  Mr Ross: We operate our business within the tax systems which exist.

  Q244  Mr Davidson: Which is that you do not pay any.

  Mr Ross: The Prince of Wales pays income tax.

  Q245  Mr Davidson: No, no, I am keeping the Prince of Wales's money separate from the Duchy's money. I think it is important to do that, I am sure you would agree. You do not pay corporation tax or capital gains tax, I am asking if you could clarify for us how much that would have cost you if you had been paying it. How much is the value of this tax avoidance worth?

  Mr Ross: I am not in a position to be able to tell you that.

  Q246  Mr Davidson: Sorry? You do not know or will not tell?

  Mr Ross: We do not have the information about base values.

  Q247  Mr Davidson: If next year it was decided you were going to pay tax, are you telling us you could not possibly calculate how much tax you should pay?

  Mr Ross: If you do not have a tax system, it is quite hard to make the calculations on base values.

  Q248  Mr Davidson: So you cannot calculate it. So an estimate of £40 million might very well be accurate, so effectively you are receiving a £40 million subsidy from the taxpayer as a result of not paying tax. That figure is just as accurate as any other estimate?

  Mr Ross: You could say any figure, you could say £5 million, you could say £100 million, I do not think it bears any relevance. You people have picked some figures up on a loose calculation, I do not really think it is my decision to haggle.

  Q249  Mr Davidson: No, but you mentioned between £5-100 million there, you know the estate better than I do, you are running it, you must have come to some conclusion. I wonder if you can possibly give us a note which might assist us to value the tax exemption your estate receives because it may be we want to take that into account in formulating our recommendation; is that possible? I want to be clear, when you say you do not want to do it, is this a "don't want" or just simply "can't" because if it is a "can't" it calls into question, I would have thought, the competence of the operation.

  Mr Ross: At the moment, the capital gains means you have a gain from here to here.

  Q250  Mr Davidson: Yes, I understand that.

  Mr Ross: We have no base lines. I do not whether you would make a conjecture for us whether the base line is on 1992 figures or on—

  Q251  Mr Davidson: That is a "won't say" then really, is it not? Can I clarify your relationship with VAT for a moment. Do you pay value added tax on anything?

  Mr Ross: Yes, we do.

  Q252  Mr Davidson: On everything?

  Mr Willis: We operate the normal VAT regime.

  Q253  Mr Davidson: Can I turn to your role as a property developer. The Prince of Wales has always been pretty strong on a number of issues, ethics and so on, and sustainability. The property in which you have invested, could any of the property in which you have invested be described as unethical or unsustainable in environmental terms?

  Mr Ross: Possibly.

  Q254  Mr Davidson: Possibly. That is helpful.

  Mr Ross: We invest in a number of types of property.

  Q255  Mr Davidson: Some of which might be in contradiction to the express views of the Prince who chairs the board and makes the decisions.

  Mr Ross: We have to make certain balances.

  Q256  Mr Davidson: I understand that.

  Mr Ross: On the capital account and on the revenue account we are charged by a variety of procedures to perform in a certain way. The Prince of Wales's views about the environment and sustainability are very strongly felt. If it is on our own land, which indeed we are doing at Poundbury, those standards which you are referring to are very highly followed. If it is on land that we have acquired or for some reason is in our possession for historical reasons that is going to be redeveloped, what is there already may not be in our control.

  Q257  Mr Davidson: You have been there forever so presumably—

  Mr Ross: Some of these buildings were put in place before the Prince of Wales was around.

  Q258  Mr Davidson: You have the option to sell them, of course, notwithstanding the fact that you do not have base values, you have the option to sell them?

  Mr Ross: These are the commercial criteria.

  Q259  Mr Davidson: I understand that but the point I am saying is given that the Prince has expressed very strong views on this I do find it surprising you cannot give us an assurance that all the property owned by the Duchy, none of it can be described as unethical or unsustainable in environmental terms. It seems to me that there is one rule the Prince would wish to apply to others but one rule that he applies to his own investments.

  Mr Ross: We try to influence this in two ways. One, by setting an example and, two, by being involved with the people who occupy those properties to whom we let, by showing the benefits. The thing which we try to point out is that good practice and sustainability and commercial can come together. It is a gradual process.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 28 July 2005