Select Committee on Public Accounts Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 260-279)

THE ACCOUNTS OF THE DUCHIES OF CORNWALL AND LANCASTER

7 FEBRUARY 2005

  Q260  Mr Davidson: Can you give us a list of the properties in which you have investments in order that we can make judgments as to whether or not they are ethical and sustainable?

  Mr Ross: We have something over 3,000 different agreements with people.

  Q261  Mr Davidson: Is that a yes then or a no?

  Mr Ross: We have 3,000 different agreements.

  Q262  Mr Davidson: I am asking whether or not you can give us a list of the properties in which you have money invested in order that we and others can make an assessment as to whether or not those investments are ethical and sustainable.

  Mr Ross: It is a very judgmental issue.

  Q263  Mr Davidson: Are you willing to give us the information?

  Mr Ross: I will discuss what is ethical and sustainable if—

  Q264  Mr Davidson: I am prepared to debate the issue. Will you make the information available about the investments in order that judgments can be made by you, me and third parties about what is ethical and sustainable?

  Mr Ross: I do not think this is an issue which is relevant to this Committee.

  Q265  Mr Davidson: Sorry, I am asking the questions and you are providing the answers, that is the way in which the Committee works. I am asking you whether you will provide a list of the properties that are held by the Duchy in order that we can measure whether or not they come up to the standard about which the Prince speaks so often and so movingly.

  Mr Ross: I think it is something I would need to have a great deal clearer understanding of because who is going to be the judge of what is ethical and sustainable.

  Q266  Mr Davidson: Public opinion. The Prince has spoken at great length on this. We would measure them against the criteria he has set himself. Can we have a report on the list of properties?

  Mr Ross: I do not see why.

  Q267  Mr Davidson: I know you do not see it but I am asking you, can we have it?

  Mr Ross: I do think it would serve any better purpose—

  Q268  Mr Davidson: You do not think that but I do. I am asking you—yes or no—will you make available a list of the properties? Are you refusing to do so?

  Mr Ross: I am not saying no but I still need to be persuaded there is a good reason to do so.

  Q269  Mr Davidson: If you are not saying no you are saying yes then. This is a simple yes/no question.

  Mr Ross: I am leaving the question unanswered because I cannot see the purpose of it.

  Q270  Mr Davidson: Given that the Prince has expressed strong views on out of town supermarkets and things that he describes as carbuncles, can you tell us whether or not you own any of those?

  Mr Ross: The only supermarket which I am aware of is one that has been built at Poundbury which was subject to very stringent control.

  Q271  Mr Davidson: There are no other supermarkets or out of town superstores or anything similar?

  Mr Ross: We have other out of town industrial properties.

  Q272  Mr Davidson: Are they carbuncles?

  Mr Ross: They are ones we have purchased—

  Q273  Mr Davidson: Is that a yes or a no? Are they carbuncles or are they not?

  Mr Ross: What is a carbuncle in your opinion?

  Q274  Mr Davidson: Give me a list of them and let me see them.

  Mr Ross: They have been built to a very high standard.

  Q275  Mr Davidson: Okay, you are refusing to do that. Okay, I understand that. Can I ask in terms of commercial development, because you do not pay tax, that is obviously going to affect the investment appraisal decisions which you make about what will give a return and so on, do you think that is unfair competition with other developers?

  Mr Ross: Again, it is not an issue for me to be considering.

  Q276  Mr Davidson: Okay. It is too complicated. Can I ask about judgments for property sales and in particular could I ask about 97 Park Road, Hampton Hill which I understand was sold at considerably less than the market rate—

  Mr Ross: It was not.

  Q277  Mr Davidson: —to a Michael David Fawcett. It was not sold for less; how do you know it was not sold for less?

  Mr Ross: We had independent valuers who we appointed. We got a Section 11 warrant from the Treasury.

  Q278  Mr Davidson: Do you know how much that property was bought for?

  Mr Ross: I do.

  Q279  Mr Davidson: You will be able to estimate the capital gains on that property at least and therefore the scale of the value to you of being exempt from capital gains tax?

  Mr Ross: I think we would because we have a base value that the house was purchased on. Again, it would be theoretical.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 28 July 2005