2 THE IMPACT OF LABOUR MARKET
PROGRAMMES TO ASSIST OLDER PEOPLE
8. 7. In intervening in the labour market, the
Department seeks to strike a balance between offering people early
help and not assisting those who would find work anyway.[8]
Jobcentre Plus and its contractors deliver programmes to improve
the employability of working age people, including those aged
over 50. These include New Deal programmes to help jobseekers
into work through information, advice and support, and Work Based
Learning for Adults, the Government's main training programme
for adults.
9. 8. New Deal 50 Plus is the Government's main
employment initiative to help return to work people aged 50 and
over who have been without a job for six months or more.[9]
The programme is voluntary and has three main elements: access
to a Personal Adviser, who provides one-to-one guidance about
finding work, an in-work financial incentive and an in-work training
grant. By September 2004, the programme had helped an estimated
158,000 older people into work at a cost of £250 million.
10. 9. Compared with other New Deal programmes,
performance data for this programme is limited, and a full economic
evaluation of its effectiveness in increasing employment among
older people has not been undertaken. The Department said that
it had focused its evaluation efforts on what makes the programme
work and what people thought of the programme.[10]
Consequently, it has limited knowledge of how many might have
found work anyway, without the programme's assistance.[11]
The Department accepted that awareness of the New Deal 50 Plus
was low, believing this was probably due to its voluntary nature.
Increased emphasis is being given to this client group.[12]
11. 10. In 2003, the in-work financial incentive
under New Deal 50 Plus changed from an Employment Credit to a
payment made as part of the Working Tax Credit. The Employment
Credit had been paid directly to the individual and was highly
visible, whereas the Tax Credit is made in arrears by an adjustment
to pay packets and based on household not individual income. Data
on the take up of the Tax Credit is not available because secondary
legislation has not yet been introduced to allow the Department
for Work and Pensions access to this data for the purpose of evaluating
employment programmes. However, anecdotal evidence suggests that
this change has had a detrimental effect on participation in the
programme.[13]
12. 11. Local labour markets and the skills needs
of local employers vary across the country. The barriers to employment
faced by older people also differ from one individual to the next.
However, Jobcentre Plus staff, customers and third parties interviewed
for the National Audit Office's Report all felt that services
for older people, in particular New Deal 50 Plus, were still too
inflexible to meet the needs of all customers.[14]
Specifically cited were the lack of access to help under New Deal
50 Plus until customers have been out of work, and in receipt
of a qualifying benefit, for at least six months, and the lack
of sufficient opportunity or resources to refer customers to specialist
providers to address specific needs. In recognition of these differences,
Jobcentre Plus is moving towards more varied provision of local
services. The Department believes that proposals set out in Building
on New Deal, which will be piloted from 2005, should help
address these issues.[15]
Under the proposals, advisers will be able to choose from a range
of services such as job-search assistance, help to improve motivation
or employability skills, and skills training appropriate to the
needs of the local labour market. Services will be available immediately
to everyone on benefits, except those on Jobseeker's Allowance,
who generally will be not eligible for the first six months of
a claim. There will be local discretion to offer help earlier.
Figure 4 summarises some of the key elements of support
that older people say they require.
Figure 4: To help them find and remain in work many
over-50s say they need:

13. 12. Since 1979, the number of working age
people on incapacity benefits has nearly quadrupled and currently
some 1.3 million people aged between 50 and 64 are on these benefits.
The Department argued this growth was part of an international
trend in advanced societies. Around 90% of people on the benefit
expect to return to work, but currently almost half of claimants
have been on the benefit for at least five years. Around 85% of
the increase occurred before the mid-1990s, and, since then annual
inflows have fallen by around 30% and growth in numbers has slowed
significantly.[16]
The Department attributed this to a tightening of the 'gateway'
to the benefit from the mid-1990s.[17]
However, the figure for those claiming incapacity benefits is
still around twice as high as in the late 1980s, at a time when
the general health of the nation has improved, underlining the
importance of a proactive approach to helping those who are capable
of work back into a job. We are alarmed by this very serious situation.
There has not been, nor on current trends does there seem likely
to be, any significant fall in the number claiming incapacity
benefit.
14. 13. The Department recognise that in the
past little support had been provided to help people on these
benefits to return to work and attempts to reduce the stock of
claimants had had limited success.[18]
The Department also consider that the name Incapacity Benefit
is too negative and is a by-product of a system that has focused
too much on what people cannot do, rather than what they can.[19]
For those with the most severe conditions, work is often unlikely
to be possible. For others, however, the Department considers
work is possible with the right support and encouragement.[20]
Since our hearing, it has announced proposals to reform Incapacity
Benefit, distinguishing between those with potentially more manageable
conditions and those with the most severe health conditions or
impairments.[21]
15. 14. To try to identify new ways of helping
people off incapacity benefits, the Department are currently trialling
"Pathways to work" pilots in a number of Jobcentre Plus
districts. Measures include: Personal Adviser support with a new
work-focused interview regime, a return-to-work Credit and access
to rehabilitation services provided jointly by the NHS and Jobcentre
Plus. The Department reports that preliminary evidence from the
pilots is encouraging but it will not complete its evaluation
of the pilots until 2006. Currently, the Department has not secured
the resources to roll out the pilots right across the organisation,
even if they are successful.[22]
16. 15. The Department acknowledges that although
it has had success in helping disadvantaged groups into employment,
some of this may be due to placing those easiest to help.[23]
Many of those left have multiple disadvantages and are furthest
away from finding work. Jobcentre Plus has top level targets for
placing people into work that reflect the priority attached to
helping different client groups into work. The targets are intended
to acknowledge the extra effort involved in helping clients requiring
more support to find work. However, Jobcentre Plus has no top
level targets to measure improvements in the employability of
those people who have made progress but not found work, although
it does have a number of key management indicators in this area.
Creating a way of measuring progression may not be simple, but
a number of models exist in the United Kingdom, the United States,
and Europe from which a system could be drawn.[24]
17. 16. Personal Advisers are available through
all New Deal programmes and Pathways to Work pilots. They assess
the needs of disadvantaged clients, provide advice, and where
possible guide them into work. Jobcentre Plus currently employs
around 10,000 Personal Advisers.[25]
The Department for Work and Pensions - which employs staff in
a wide range of activities[26]
- is currently undertaking a major job restructuring exercise
to reduce the number of staff by 30,000 by 2008. Although at the
time of the Committee hearing, the Department had not finalised
its plans, which will bring its overall staff numbers to 100,000,
it did expect the number of Personal Advisers to be around the
same number following the exercise, which was designed to lead,
for example, to better processing of benefits and streamlining
of overheads.[27]
18. 17. The National Audit Office found that,
at local level, Jobcentre Plus and the Learning and Skills Council
often have different objectives and priorities, even though they
both provide services for older people with the common aim of
improving employability.[28]
They also often contract independently and in different ways,
with the same local service providers, which is wasteful. Closer
working is underway with the development of local co-ordinated
service delivery plans by Jobcentre Plus offices and local Learning
and Skills Councils, and the establishment of a joint working
group at official level to take forward contracting issues.[29]
8 Qq 2-3 Back
9
C&AG's Report, paras 2.14-2.20 Back
10
Q 18 Back
11
C&AG's Report, paras 2.15-2.19; Qq 17-19 Back
12
Q 55 Back
13
C&AG's Report, paras 2.19-2.20 and Figure 22; Qq 33-35 Back
14
C&AG's Report, paras 3.22-3.27 Back
15
Q 4 Back
16
C&AG's Report, paras 1.6, 2.26-2.27 and Figure 15; Qq 6, 118-119 Back
17
Q 119 Back
18
Qq 5, 75; C&AG's Report, para 2.27 Back
19
Qq 193-194, 204 Back
20
Qq 128-133 Back
21
Department for Work and Pensions Five Year Strategy (Cm 6447),
February 2005 Back
22
Qq 5, 21-24, 128-135; C&AG's Report, paras 2.26-2.29 Back
23
Q 127 Back
24
C&AG's Report, paras 2.10-2.11 Back
25
ibid, para 3.18 Back
26
Ev 19-25 Back
27
Qq 11-14, 52, 76, 92-95, 182-186 Back
28
C&AG's Report, paras 3.15-3.17 Back
29
Q 201 Back
|