Select Committee on Public Accounts Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 40-59)

DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT, PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS AND LONDON UNDERGROUND LIMITED

23 JUNE 2004

  Q40 Jon Trickett: It is not because I have not had a chance to look at it.

  Mr Rowlands: I think that is where it is, page 20.

  Jon Trickett: It refers to A3.4, if you go to page 21 you will find A3.3 but there is no A3.4.

  Q41 Mr Williams: NAO?

  Ms Leahy: Sorry, it is actually A3.2 on page 20 and there is a paragraph at the end of that page which does give some of the evidence.

  Q42 Jon Trickett: I went to A3.4 and could not find it.

  Ms Leahy: I am very sorry.

  Q43 Jon Trickett: I did not get this until Monday. I think it does demonstrate the problems we are being faced with by being given late information.

  Ms Leahy: Sorry. It is the last paragraph on page 20.

  Q44 Jon Trickett: It is not A3.4, that does not exist.

  Ms Leahy: I am sorry, it is page 20, A3.2.

  Q45 Jon Trickett: I do not want to say it is shoddy but it is not helpful when we get Reports at the last minute and it mentions paragraphs which are not there. This is a key part of the text. I want finally, if I have time left, to go to the first Report, paragraph 2.36 on page 25. Mr Williams has already referred to this discussion. I understand you, Mr Rowlands, to say that the risk is £190 million on the private sector?

  Mr Rowlands: On the debt, yes.

  Q46 Jon Trickett: Yes, on the debt. Yet the public sector appears to have been penalised by £450 million because of the risk which the private sector is taking. Am I understanding that correctly?

  Mr Rowlands: No, this is not the totality of the risks taken by the private sector because the equity is at risk put up by the infrastructure companies as well. There is a table elsewhere in the Report that sets out the detail of that.

  Q47 Jon Trickett: This sentence which you have agreed to, which we have only had 48 hours to look at, says: "although they ultimately carry risk reduced to 5% or less . . ." and you have told us that is £190 million, ". . . lenders are charging about £450 million more than they would charge on some £3,800 million of direct Government loans . . ." I can only draw the £190 million comparison of risk to the private sector to the additional £450 million cost which you have agreed to on behalf of the taxpayers and draw the conclusion that is one of the worst deals ever in front of the Committee of Public Accounts.

  Mr Rowlands: This says that if the Government had paid this money directly it would have saved £450 million over it being supplied by the private debt markets. If we had been supplying the money directly we would have been taking on, I think, the risk inherent in a set of assets whose state is unknown to everybody.

  Mr Williams: You see, Mr Rowlands, of the £3,800 million £3,610 million is guaranteed by the Government.

  Jon Trickett: Exactly. It is more than that. Elsewhere in the Report we find the Government has written letters of comfort to the private sector, presumably giving them some further certainty as well. This must be one of the worst deals ever put in front of the Committee of Public Accounts, quite frankly. How you can say this is demonstrably value for money I do not know frankly. Anyway, my time is more or less up.

  Q48 Mr Bacon: May I say to start with that I too am glad there will be another opportunity to look at this. I do not feel I have had enough time to prepare. There has to be a reasonable gap between publication of the Report and our meeting, so I welcome that agreement from you earlier. Mr O'Toole, you work at the headquarters of London Underground at St James's Park tube station?

  Mr O'Toole: Yes.

  Q49 Mr Bacon: Do you take the Tube to work?

  Mr O'Toole: Yes, I take the Tube everywhere I go.

  Q50 Mr Bacon: You do. So you are aware that there are delays and you experience them yourself?

  Mr O'Toole: Yes.

  Q51 Mr Bacon: May I ask where do you commute from in the morning, which tube station?

  Mr O'Toole: I commute from High Street Kensington or from Notting Hill, I live in between the two of them.

  Q52 Mr Bacon: Mostly you go round on the Circle Line?

  Mr O'Toole: I do. I arranged my life so I could take on the line that has caused the most on-time problems.

  Q53 Mr Bacon: If you are requiring to come round from High Street Kensington, you cannot take the District Line, you have to take the Circle Line. The Circle Line only seems to run every 20 minutes or so.

  Mr O'Toole: Actually it runs on eight minute headways.

  Q54 Mr Bacon: What does that mean?

  Mr O'Toole: It means that it is scheduled to have eight minutes between trains. The Circle Line's problem, of course, is that the Circle Line does not actually exist. It runs on the District Line and it runs on the Metropolitan Line and it is sacrificed whenever there is a problem on either of those lines. Often you feel you have a poor Circle Line service inflicted on you but it is a problem that is on one of those other lines.

  Q55 Mr Bacon: It is said because the Piccadilly goes out to Heathrow a special effort is made to keep the Piccadilly running more than most other lines. Is that broadly correct?

  Mr O'Toole: No, I would not say that is broadly correct.

  Q56 Mr Bacon: Given you are the boss, have you not made an effort to make sure the Circle Line runs a bit better?

  Mr O'Toole: Actually I have in the sense I do not believe you should sell something you cannot make. I have said to the operating department we have to find a way to make the Circle Line run better. We have run one experiment which gave preference to the Circle Line at the corners, both when it ran into the Met and when it ran into the District Line. It may have gone unnoticed so far but in the last two periods the Circle Line has been turning in performance it has not turned in in about seven years in terms of the number of trains run in the peak periods. We are running now in the mid 90s, it typically has been in the low 80s.

  Q57 Mr Bacon: Mr Rowlands, can I ask you about the extra costs of the private debt compared with public debt?

  Mr Rowlands: Yes.

  Q58 Mr Bacon: The Report says that the extra cost is £450 million, what is the total cost of the debt?

  Mr Rowlands: The total size of the debt is £3.8 billion.

  Q59 Mr Bacon: The extra cost is £450 million?

  Mr Rowlands: Over triple A.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 31 March 2005