Select Committee on Public Administration Written Evidence


Memorandum by The Revd A Pyke (GBI 02)

  I do not believe that I am alone in thinking that the Hutton Report has brought the whole concept of judicial inquiry into disrepute by the one sidedness of his findings. This must never be allowed to happen again next time there is a controversial issue to be inquired into. I suggest that two changes in procedure would help to ensure that any future inquiry would not be open to similar criticism.

  1.  No party with a major investment in the outcome of an inquiry should be allowed, on their own, to set the terms of reference.

  2.  The report should be subject to peer review by two judges before publication. I do not believe it is fair that a man like Lord Hutton should alone bear the sole responsibility for findings that may be unpopular either with Government or the public.

February 2004





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 4 January 2005