Select Committee on Science and Technology Written Evidence


APPENDIX 26

Memorandum from the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists

  1.  The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists endorses the British Fertility Society's response to the Committee.

  2.  The two main functions of the HFEA are Regulatory and Discussive. The latter function includes detailed discussion of the big issues in human reproduction, including clinical, scientific, legal, ethical and lay representation. Our view is that the Regulatory function has sometimes been confused with the Discussive function, to the detriment of the Regulatory function.

  3.  We feel that the clinical community would support the wider regulation of fertility treatments, particularly ovulation induction, not currently encompassed by the HFE Act. This would achieve some clarity about the frequency of treatments as well as the outcomes, particularly multiple pregnancy.

  4.  Donor anonymity is a difficult issue, and it is extremely important that any change is phased in very gradually, recognising the conflicts between the rights of donor and the rights of the child.

  5.  The case for embryonic stem cells production is crucial. Clearly the major clinical purpose in permitting the production of embryonic stem cells is the possible alleviation of disease. However, there is much to be learned about the origin of tissues from basic research, with possible benefits, not yet fully understood.

May 2004





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 24 March 2005