Select Committee on Science and Technology Written Evidence


APPENDIX 41

Supplementary memorandum from the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority

POSSIBLE CHANGES TO THE HFE ACT 1990

  The following are the main areas of the 1990 Act which need to be considered as part of a wider review. This is based on the HFEA's initial assessment.

DEFINITIONS/REMIT

Section 1(1a) and 4, Definition of "embryo" and "gametes"

  An amended definition of "embryo" and "gametes" might clarify that the remit of the Act also extends to embryos that have been created by other means than "fertilisation" (CNR, parthenogenesis), and to artificially created gametes.

Schedule 2 (3(1)), Regulation of CNR

  If amended, could include provision for the specific regulation of CNR and research on embryos created by parthenogenesis.

Section 2(1), Definition of "treatment services"

  A tighter definition of "treatment services" might clarify that the use of IVF for reasons unrelated to fertility issues can be within the remit of the Authority (for example PGD/HLA).

IMPLICATIONS OF THE EU TISSUE DIRECTIVE

Section 4, GIFT and IUI

  Extending remit to GIFT (using patients' own gametes) and IUI would bring these treatments into line with others and would enable Authority to regulate issues of multiple births, counselling, consent procedures and so on. Also seems to be required by EU Tissue Directive, which covers the donation, procurement, testing, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of all mature gametes.

Section 4, Commercial provision of gametes

  Bringing the commercial provision of gametes, including internet providers within the scope of the Act would enable the Authority to regulate this currently unregulated area (for example enforcing 6 month quarantine period).

  Internet sperm providers are probably within the reach of the EU tissue directive.

FAMILY LAW CONTEXT

Sections 13(5) and 25(2), Welfare of the child assessment

  Need to review whether requirement of "child's need for a father" is in line with Civil Partnerships Bill (CPB), European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) and the Adoption and Children Act 2002 (ACA 2002).

Section 28

  Need to review whether "treatment together provisions" which apply only to heterosexual couples are in line with the CPB, ECHR and ACA 2002. This might require a new definition of "parent".

Section 28(5B)(c) and Section 1 of HFE, (Deceased Fathers) Act 2003

  Where sperm is stored prior to cancer treatments and provisions have been made for using the sperm after the man's death, it is not always clear how the "treatment together" requirement can be fulfilled (in order to record an unmarried man as the father of a posthumous child).

Section 30, Parental orders

  Need to review whether allowing parental orders in surrogacy agreements only for married couples is in line with the CPB, ECHR and the ACA 2002.

Schedule 3, Consent to storage of gametes

  Gillick-competent cancer patients can consent to the storage of gametes for later use. There might be a case for extending this option to non-Gillick competent children, by allowing parents to consent on behalf of their children. There might also be a case for reviewing the situation for temporarily incapacitated adults (but not those in a persistent coma).

CONFIDENTIALITY

Section 33(1), (2), (3), Disclosure of information

  Enabling Authority to more easily share information (for example with GMC or MRC) would better reflect current law and opinion on appropriate extent of confidentiality of patient information and would also allow linking the HFEA register with other medical databases, such as the cancer register. Current restrictions also make it harder for the HFEA to recruit staff or employ consultants.

Section 33(2)(b), Information given to the Authority in confidence

  Needs to be reviewed in light of the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA), and the Freedom of Information Act (FOI).

Section 33 (6c), Disclosure only to a named individual

  Abolition would enable clinics, for example, to make welfare of the child inquiries to the GP practice, rather than an individual GP. It might also facilitate access by researchers to confidential information.

THE ROLE AND FUNCTION OF THE AUTHORITY

Section 8, Statutory functions of the Authority

  Need to assess whether there is a case for clearer set of objectives for the Authority against which it could assess its own functions and be externally accountable. This might include a commitment to protecting the interests of patients by ensuring that licensed centres adopt suitable practices or to ensuring that research on embryos is carried out in an appropriate ethical and regulatory framework.

Sections 25 and 26, Code of Practice

  Modernising the format of the Code of Practice (making it a "live", flexible and constantly updateable document) might necessitate changes to the requirement that every amendment needs prior approval from the Secretary of State. This would be based on a duty to consult on proposed rules or changes to rules.

Section 41, Sanctions

  A wider range of options for addressing non-compliance with licence conditions (ie a system of fines) would give the Authority more teeth in addressing situations which might require a firm response, but where suspension or revocation of the licences could not be justified.

Schedule 2 (1) and (2), Time-limited licences only

  To enable non-time limited treatment and storage licences to be issued subject to regular inspection of clinics (no less than every two years) might simplify the licensing regime without compromising the effective regulation of clinics.

Schedule 2 (3), Licensing clinical trials and training

  The ability to issue clinical trials licences might give greater control over the introduction of new techniques and technologies into clinical practice. Training licences would allow proper regulation of training which currently can only be undertaken under a research licence.

Additional regulation making powers

  The currently limited regulation making powers of the Act mean that a change in policy (for example the abolition of donor anonymity) cannot be enforced through regulation, but only through changing every individual licence of every clinic dealing with donor sperm.

Statutory storage periods

  There might be a case for including statutory storage periods in the Code of Practice, rather than in a number of regulations.

June 2004





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 24 March 2005