Select Committee on Standards and Privileges Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 20 - 39)

TUESDAY 25 JANUARY 2005

MR JONATHAN SAYEED MP

  Q20  Mrs Browning: Is there a reason for that?

  Mr Sayeed: I am kicking myself and racking my brains about this and one thing did occur to me at the weekend and so it is not part of the evidence. As you will have seen, the website is a separate entity and not run by The English Manner. When the website was set up I thought I knew what was on it because right at the beginning, in 2001-02, a collection of photographs and brochures et cetera had been put together that were going to constitute the website. I know it sounds rather weak, but that is what I thought the website was.

  Q21  Mrs Browning: Do you see the company website as a marketing tool?

  Mr Sayeed: Yes.

  Q22  Mrs Browning: And you advise the company on marketing?

  Mr Sayeed: I advise them on what I would call strategic marketing. In other words, I advise them on the way you approach markets and, quite bluntly, as this is almost a "boutique" company run by two ladies, how to keep their costs down because they are good at spending money.

  Q23  Mrs Browning: Do you see a company website as part of the marketing strategy and as a tool for future sales?

  Mr Sayeed: Yes.

  Q24  Mr Dismore: What you are saying is that the various dinners at the House of Commons were to do with friends and you saw no conflict of interest between the two. Is that right?

  Mr Sayeed: With one exception, one or more were friends. The one exception is the New York Times journalist Bob Morris.

  Q25  Mr Dismore: If you did not see it as a conflict of interest why did you tick the box on the Refreshment Department booking form to say that there was?

  Mr Sayeed: You have lost me.

  Q26  Mr Dismore: On the Refreshment Department booking form you tick a box to say if you have a conflict of interest. If there was no conflict of interest why did you tick that box on the form?

  Mr Sayeed: It seems to me that that is a belt and braces approach. Was this the garden group?

  Q27  Mr Dismore: Generally speaking you would tick the box.

  Mr Sayeed: Can you tell me which one this was?

  Q28  Mr Dismore: I think you did it for all of them.

  Mr Sayeed: A registrable interest, and I am quite prepared to be corrected if I am wrong, is whether any company of which I had an interest has any interest in these particular clients and the answer is quite clearly yes. I would have thought that I would be attacked if I had not ticked the box. They did not pay to come here. They did not expect to come here. It did not form any part of the contract that they entered into with The English Manner. The reason they were here was because they were friends.

  Q29  Mr Dismore: Can I take you through to the visits which are set out at pages 14 and 15 in the Commissioner's report,[9] "Dinner was hosted by Mr Sayeed . . . The family were The English Manner Limited's first paying clients . . . were also close personal friends." If you look at your latest submission,[10] which includes your business plan,[11] one of the things that you say here as part of your marketing strategy is "Friends, family and meetings in cities across US". Is it not really the case that you see, although they were personal friends, part of your marketing strategy, as Mrs Browning has put to you, was to be getting people to go back and say what a wonderful time they have had?

  Mr Sayeed: I think I have answered that with Mrs Browning. The point I would reiterate is that I would want them to go back and make clear to their friends that they were enthused with the contract which they paid for and the way The English Manner had looked after them, but that contract did not include Parliament whatsoever.[12]

  Q30  Mr Dismore: Did you discuss with the guests what the House of Commons' rules were in detail so that they might be able to make such a distinction as you are making?

  Mr Sayeed: No.

  Q31  Mr Dismore: I think it would be fair to say that as far as they were concerned it was all part of one experience.

  Mr Sayeed: No, it would not be fair to say that because it was made quite clear to them they were coming here as my personal guests because they were friends.

  Q32  Mr Dismore: Part of the marketing strategy is to target friends.

  Mr Sayeed: Is it friends or friends and family?

  Q33  Mr Dismore: It is friends, family and meetings.

  Mr Sayeed: Could you give me the page number?

  Q34  Mr Dismore: This is the second last page of the business plan.[13]

  Mr Sayeed: Is it the one that says "Strategic Plan"?

  Q35  Mr Dismore: Yes. While we are on the same point I can put the same thing to you again in relation to visit number (iii).

  Mr Sayeed: It says "friends, family and meetings in cities across US—Genie". I am not Genie.[14]

  Q36  Mr Dismore: The point about it is that it is targeting friends and family as part of the marketing strategy.

  Mr Sayeed: I have to say, Mr Dismore, if you are citing this as a piece of evidence that demonstrates that I was using the House of Commons for my personal gain then I disagree. This actually says, "Friends, family and meetings in cities across US—Genie".

  Q37  Mr Dismore: Let me put this one to you, number (iii), Lake Forest Garden Club, 25 May 2004. On the same page I have just referred to it says "Garden clubs—Lizzy's Godmother".

  Mr Sayeed: Yes.

  Q38  Mr Dismore: Also, if you look at the last page of your business plan, one of the things is to "Donate trips on reserve to auctions", another promotion.

  Mr Sayeed: Let me just deal with the first bit. This is a document produced, as I understand it, in September 2004. The Garden Club came in in May 2004. I did not prepare the strategic plan.

  Q39  Mr Dismore: Are you saying you were not aware of the strategic plan for the marketing of the company bearing in mind that you said you are strategically involved in that?

  Mr Sayeed: Of course I read it. I did not write it is what I am saying. The strategic plan is dated September 2004. The visit by The Garden Club was in May 2004. Quite clearly it was such a success that Mrs Messervy thought it would be very sensible, no doubt from comments that she had received, to target garden clubs.


9   Appendix 1, para 3(i)-(v). Back

10   Appendix 4. Back

11   Not reported. Back

12   Note by witness: The document quoted from was dated September 2004, long after these guests came. Back

13   Not reported. Back

14   Note by witness: The document quoted from was dated September 2004, long after these guests came and it was targeting in the US aimed at potential new clients. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 3 February 2005