Select Committee on Transport Fifth Report


6 Conclusion

83. As the Secretary of State said, it is no good carting fresh air around the country. But that is not an argument for closing rural lines. We want high quality, well-used regional railways. It is important not to lose sight of why we need these railways. The strategy should not be simply a matter of reducing the subsidy, although that will be a welcome outcome of success. In many rural areas a rail service, properly connected with other public transport modes, will offer a quicker transport service than driving along rural roads. The Government rightly has targets for improving air quality and reducing greenhouse gas emissions: transferring traffic from road to rail will help achieve these. The Government wants to reduce congestion; while many rural railways will begin in areas where congestion is not a problem, the journeys they feed into may well end up in a congested town or city, or, if made by car, mean adding to the congestion on the strategic road network. The Government wants to promote social inclusion; a thriving regional network can assist in this. Britain currently has a net deficit of tourism; a healthy and effective rail system can attract visitors to areas they might otherwise have missed.

84. The SRA's community rail lines will have CRPs to support them; many of the lines which feed into major cities will be nurtured by the Passenger Transport Executives; franchises will always have an interest in the inter-city links. There may be a danger that the Government's community rail policy creates Cinderella services, which although important for local people, lack any of these bodies within government or the industry prepared to act as their advocate. If the Community Rail Strategy proves a success, we expect the government to look again at the way railways are categorised and supported to ensure that this does not happen.

85. Reducing costs on the rail network is important, and is as important on rural lines as elsewhere. It must be a key part of strategy. But we believe the Government should also have an aspiration for growth on the rural railway; if services and infrastructure were enhanced rural railways could play a far greater part in meeting people's need to travel in a sustainable way. We consider that any success achieved by CRPs must be rewarded with the promise of enhancements to infrastructure and services where necessary. Otherwise the Government will miss the opportunities that a successful rural network will offer.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 15 March 2005