Select Committee on Transport Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 220-221)

MR ANSON JACK

10 NOVEMBER 2004

  Q220 Chairman: It is the line of responsibility I am trying to sort out. It is decided to have a community railway. You then set in effect an umbrella over the set-up but you do not decide the precise terms of anything like a derogation; that is done by a subject committee?

  Mr Jack: Yes. We would be effectively the technical advisers, the administrators of the process. We own the standards that are published and mandated for the industry but the decision-making process for a standard change is one that involves a collective industry decision.

  Q221 Chairman: Because of your own personal experience of the industry and the experience of the people who are fulfilling that role, you would not automatically expect that to mean that a rural railway line would have to comply with the very high standards of a high speed line because the situation is totally different and they would be required to operate within those parameters. Is that correct?

  Mr Jack: That is correct, but it is worth saying that they do not have to comply with those same standards today.

  Chairman: No, and I think that point is very important and it should not be missed. You have been very helpful, Mr Jack. Thank you very much indeed.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 9 December 2004