Select Committee on Transport Seventh Report


Summary


Between 2003 and 2004 traffic on the United Kingdom's roads increased by 1.7 per cent.[1] This may not sound much: it was 5.2 billion miles more than was travelled in 2003. The Department for Transport anticipates a 30 per cent increase in road traffic (compared to 2000 levels) by 2015.[2] Congestion already has a strangle-hold on many of our towns and cities at rush hour and on important parts of the strategic road network. We know that the UK has some of the most congested roads in Europe; what we do not know, with any certainty, is the cost that this congestion imposes on the British economy. A thorough evaluation of the costs of congestion and an understanding of its economic impact are urgently required, if the cost effectiveness of a national road pricing scheme is to be properly assessed.

We welcome the Government's acknowledgement that although some new road infrastructure may be needed, we cannot simply build our way out of the congestion problems we face. There is a broad consensus that some form of demand management will be necessary as part of a package of measures to improve conditions on the road network. Road pricing has the potential to reduce congestion and to ensure that the price of road transport correctly reflects the wider costs of road use. We welcome the fact that the Secretary of State for Transport is leading the debate. If the cost of the scheme can be brought in line with its benefits, and if the potential impacts on road safety and social inclusion can be minimised, road pricing should be introduced. However, road pricing is not an end in itself: it must contribute to social and economic objectives such as sustaining vibrant, accessible and economically active urban centres.

Central London already has a congestion charging scheme in place, and the new M6 Toll road has introduced motorway tolling to the UK. Modelling suggests that a national road pricing system could reduce urban congestion by nearly half. It is sensible to take a phased approach to a national road pricing system. But it is not straightforward. There are several choices to be made. There are difficult issues with which professionals and politicians alike are wrestling. There are fundamental questions to be decided:

  • which roads to price and when,
  • which technology systems to use,
  • how to set the tariffs, and
  • how to spend the revenue.

Ultimately the Government must make some difficult decisions. National road pricing would have to be acceptable to the public. The central choice is which is preferable: increasingly congested roads, or the introduction of road user charging?

The Department for Transport has suggested that a national road pricing system would not be technologically possible before 2014. We have heard estimates that put the potential start date earlier. Even so, there are proven small-scale applications that could be undertaken today. The Government expects local urban charging schemes to "amount to a trajectory towards a national road pricing system."[3] But after Edinburgh's recent rejection of city-wide charging no metropolitan area is actively pursuing urban congestion charging proposals. Generally speaking we think this form of demand management is a good thing, but there will be circumstances in which it is not appropriate and local authorities are best placed to take that decision in relation to their own road system. The Government must work through the difficulties with local and regional government. Road pricing schemes must not be undertaken in isolation, and complementary measures such as improved public transport services must be in place before the charges come into force. Furthermore, the Government must not duck its responsibility for charging on the most congested stretches of the strategic road network, which is under its direct control.

A national road pricing system would radically transform the way we pay for road use. As the possibility of a national road pricing system draws closer, the Government must make other transport policy decisions with this potential transformation strongly in mind. The road building programme and road improvement proposals should be appraised against traffic forecasts which take into account the impact of national road pricing on travel behaviour. The Government is about to sign contracts for systems that will deliver the Lorry Road User Charge. Ideally the contracts should allow sufficient flexibility for the Lorry Road User Charge to integrate into a national, or even European, system. Similarly, it would be a mistake to encourage a patchwork of privately operated toll roads, like the M6 Toll, across the UK which could not, without significant expense, be incorporated into subsequent national transport strategies, such as road pricing. The M6 Toll could prove to be a costly experiment if the Government has to buy out the 50 year concession agreement to enable national interoperability.


1   National Statistics, Transport Statistics Bulletin Traffic in Great Britain Q4 2004 Back

2   RP21A Back

3   Department for Transport (2004) The Future of Transport White Paper: a network for 2030. Cm 6234. Page 47 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 24 March 2005