Select Committee on Transport Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 373-379)

DR DENVIL COOMBE, PROFESSOR PETER MACKIE, DR GREGORY MARSDEN AND DR DAVID METZ

26 JANUARY 2005

  Chairman: We have a little housekeeping, gentlemen. Members having an interest to declare?

  Clive Efford: Member of the Transport and General Workers' Union.

  Chairman: Gwyneth Dunwoody, ASLEF.

  Mrs Ellman: Louise Ellman, member of the Transport and General Workers' Union.

  Mr Stringer: Graham Stringer, member of Amicus.

  Q373 Chairman: Gentlemen, can I firstly say how very welcome you are this afternoon? Did any of you want to begin the session with a statement or may we go straight to questions?

  Dr Coombe: I think we can go straight to questions.

  Q374 Chairman: Can I ask all of you whether you agree it is impossible to build our way out of congestion without limiting traffic growth?

  Dr Coombe: Yes.

  Q375 Chairman: Does that mean yes, we can build our way out of congestion?

  Dr Coombe: It is impossible to build your way out of congestion. I think the government has accepted this most clearly in relation to the M25. If one wanted to cater for unrestrained demand on the M25, one would have to widen it by an extra three lanes in each direction as opposed to the current plans to widen it by only one.

  Q376 Chairman: I trust you are not going to suggest that to anyone?

  Dr Coombe: The widening by one is what I have suggested. You can find that pattern throughout the country.

  Q377 Chairman: What about limiting traffic growth?

  Dr Coombe: Is it a good idea or can it be done? It is a good idea and it can be done through road pricing.

  Q378 Chairman: Does anybody else want to comment?

  Professor Mackie: Yes. I would like to agree with Dr Coombe. A pure capacity enhancing programme is inconceivable. It is unaffordable. It would be unacceptable on environmental grounds. If you could overcome those problems on the inter-urban network, you would run into tremendous difficulties at the interface between the inter-urban network and the local road network. Therefore, the policy has to be a judicious mixture of pricing, physical demand management and capacity enhancement, all three sets of policies going hand in hand in order to try to manage our road network more efficiently.

  Q379 Chairman: Would the point Dr Coombe was making about the suggestion of one lane widening deal with it or are you saying that the mix of measures would deal with the fact that, if you get far more traffic coming off the roads onto the urban areas, you would have a problem with congestion there? Do you think the one lane widening would have that effect?

  Professor Mackie: Yes, I think it would. One lane on the M25 is an awful lot of traffic. The compatibility between the capacity on the trunks and the feeders is already a very significant problem as anyone who queues at junctions on the M25 or the M60 knows. It is a problem already and it would be exacerbated by a major investment programme on the inter-urban network with no other supporting measures.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 2 August 2005