Select Committee on Transport Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 220-228)

23 JUNE 2004

MR DAVID JAMIESON MP, MS THERESA CROSSLEY AND MR PHILIP DONLAN

  Q220 Ian Lucas: So that is why you are a Minister?

  Mr Jamieson: Yes.

  Q221 Ian Lucas: So you are going to do something about it?

  Mr Jamieson: Well, that is why I am saying when we get the submissions in this is something we want to have a very close look at, as long as we do not do something that has the reverse effect to that that we want.

  Ian Lucas: Thank you.

  Q222 Clive Efford: Just briefly, because it really is on that same point and that is if we were to accept that there is an issue around employing people in deep sea services where there is hot competition, let us say, for employment for people who are on lower wages, but we have had it explained to us this afternoon by the unions representing the seafarers that even in the short sea shipping and in our ferry industry significant numbers of jobs have gone to people who are on lower wages. Now, there is an economic incentive for the shipping companies to do that. Has that caused you any concern? Have you had occasion to comment on that, which is clearly against the intentions of your considerations that you are requiring the companies to consider?

  Mr Jamieson: Well, currently we only have the authority, for example on the work permit scheme, to insist that the people who are aboard the ships are EEA or EU resident people. On the domestic passenger ferries, on dredgers in UK waters and since 2001 on domestic scheduled freight, and we are looking at the one port journeys as well (these are mainly out to the rigs), we are consulting with the Home Office about how that would be policed.

  Q223 Clive Efford: So are you saying that if that has happened that would be in clear breach of the obligations as you understand them?

  Mr Jamieson: Oh, yes. The work permit scheme says that the offer of the employment has to be made to an EEA employee first. If such a person does not exist or does not come forward for the job then they can employ someone from outside the EEA.

  Q224 Clive Efford: We were told earlier on, I think it was Mr Todd from RMT who said that 350 jobs had disappeared in this way at Dover. So would you take that back and investigate that?

  Mr Jamieson: If it was in those categories that I have just read out and they had not operated the work permit scheme then clearly I am sure the union would have brought that to our attention.

  Q225 Chairman: If you look at the summary of UK seafaring numbers 1997-2003, Minister, which I am sure you are well acquainted with, the percentage change in the total in training is minus 7.52. The actual total is minus 7.58. The total active seafarers are minus 4.73. So even given the tonnage tax we have got a problem, have we not?

  Mr Jamieson: You are talking about ratings there rather than officers?

  Q226 Chairman: Well, I am talking about cadets and officers because officers are minus 2.80 and cadets in training, the total in training, are minus 7.52. These are quite noticeable figures, are they not? So your total active seafarers are down by nearly minus 5. They are not but they are nearly minus 5.

  Mr Jamieson: What we have done is what was within our gift to do and the tonnage tax, which has now been much emulated in other countries, has brought in this training commitment. What we have not got is the ability to insist that people are employed by the individual companies. They make the decisions themselves.

  Q227 Chairman: Are you looking at that aspect of it?

  Mr Jamieson: Well, that is what I have just been saying in answer to Ian Lucas, that precise point. We need to look to see if we can put together an employment link that is actually workable, that has the effect that we want it to have, and I do not want it to have the opposite effect.

  Q228 Chairman: How will the flag neutrality of the UK regime be affected by the EU state aid guidelines?

  Mr Donlan: I think I have probably answered that question earlier, in that the UK's derogation from the flag link can remain, the tonnage tax under the revised guidelines, but there will be more stringent monitoring both of the extent to which vessels are on the flag and there will be some commitment that needs to be given that people will not reduce the proportion of EU flagged vessels, but otherwise it should remain pretty much as it is at present.

  Chairman: Minister, you have had a rather lively time this afternoon. We are grateful to you and to your staff for coming. Thank you very much indeed.







 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 10 February 2005