Select Committee on Transport Eighth Report


2  Organisation of SAR services

The international context

4. Search and Rescue (SAR) is generally understood to mean the location and recovery of people who are in distress, in potential distress or missing, and their delivery to a place of safety. The United Kingdom is a signatory to various international conventions, notably the Convention on the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS 1974), the Convention on Maritime Search and Rescue (SAR 1979) and the Convention on International Civil Aviation ("the Chicago Convention" 1974). These oblige the UK to provide certain Search and Rescue services in the UK Search and Rescue Region for civil maritime and civil aeronautical traffic, and require some of these to be organised in certain ways.[3]

5. Although the international obligations impose a common framework for each State Party's Search and Rescue organisation, for example by requiring Maritime Rescue Co­ordination Centres (MRCCs), there are many models worldwide for the organisation of the services which are an essential part of the SAR effort. For example, many lifeboat and lifesaving services are non-governmental organisations (NGOs) like our own RNLI, but some also provide other services, and others are government bodies, like the Canadian Coast Guard.[4] Some choices about the provision of the UK's civil maritime and aeronautical SAR services therefore remain matters for the UK, but our international obligations require that the services themselves must be provided and placed within a defined organisational framework. Inland Search and Rescue—such as mountain rescue and lowland search—is not governed by international obligations in the same way. We nevertheless consider inland SAR to be an essential service.

The UK Search and Rescue Organisation

6. The UK Search and Rescue Organisation is "an amalgam of civil, military, maritime, aeronautical and land-based assets involving separate Government Departments, the emergency services and other organisations. These include a number of charities and voluntary organisations which play a significant role in providing a national SAR capability."[5] Although, as previously noted, the Department for Transport has responsibility for civil aeronautical and maritime SAR policy, the police service is responsible for the co­ordination of land-based and inland waters SAR. By inter-departmental agreement, the Ministry of Defence, which provides SAR facilities for military purposes, also exercises the Department for Transport's responsibility for civil aeronautical SAR.

7. The UK SAR Organisation exists primarily through its committee structure. The current structures were established in 2000 and replaced the previous "UK Search and Rescue Committee", which many of our witnesses agreed had been unwieldy, and which did not bring together air, land and sea interests in the same way.[6] Mr Michael Vlasto, Operations Director of the RNLI and a member of the current UK SAR Operators Group, described the current arrangement as "not perfect but it is a lot better than it was."[7]

8. The UK SAR Strategic Committee is the inter­agency policy forum which brings together organisations with aeronautical, maritime and land­based SAR responsibilities. It advises Ministers on the structure, scope and framework of the organisation of SAR for the UK SAR region.[8] The Department for Transport representative chairs the Strategic Committee, and the Department also provides its secretariat. The Ministry of Defence provides the vice chair. The other members of the Strategic Committee are the Home Office, the Maritime & Coastguard Agency, the Association of Chief Police Officers of England, Wales and Northern Ireland (ACPO), the Association of Chief Police Officers in Scotland (ACPO(S)), the Chief Fire Officers' Association (CFOA), the Ambulance Service Association (ASA) and the Royal National Lifeboat Institution (RNLI).

9. Mr David Jamieson MP, Parliamentary Under­Secretary of State at the Department for Transport, told us that the Strategic Committee met only once last year.[9] This is at odds with the requirements of the UK SAR Framework, which was only published in 2002 and states that it should meet at least twice per year.[10] Mr Andrew Freemantle MBE, Chief Executive of the RNLI, told us that he did not think the Strategic Committee met often enough,[11] and Captain Stephen Bligh, Chief Executive of the Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA), suggested that "possibly it [the committee] has not been as active as it should have been".[12] We do not advocate meetings of the Strategic Committee for the sake of having them, but last year the committee did not even meet the undemanding terms of the SAR Organisation's "constitution". There also seems to be an appetite from the both the MCA and the RNLI—the only non­governmental member of the committee—to meet more often.

10. As Chairman of the UK SAR Strategic Committee, the Department for Transport should review the frequency of meetings of that committee. We agree that there is no point to unnecessary meetings, but the RNLI and MCA suggest the committee could meet more often. We hope that the issues raised in this report will provide some suitable subject matter for discussion at those meetings.

11. The UK SAR Operators Group brings together the national organisations whose members and employees provide search and rescue services. It is part of the same overall structure as the Strategic Committee, but we were told it meets every two to three months.[13] It advises and makes recommendations to the Strategic Committee. The Operators Group is chaired by the Maritime and Coastguard Agency. The Ministry of Defence (RAF) provides the vice-chair. Other Members of the Group are the Association of Chief Police Officers of England, Wales and Northern Ireland (ACPO), the Association of Chief Police Officers in Scotland (ACPO(S)), the Chief Fire Officers' Association (CFOA), the Ambulance Service Association (ASA), the Royal National Lifeboat Institution (RNLI), the Royal Life Saving Society, Mountain Rescue—England and Wales, the Mountain Rescue Committee of Scotland, the British Cave Rescue Council and the Association of Lowland Search and Rescue (ALSAR).

12. In 2001, the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) became the Government Department responsible for the fire and rescue service, which had previously been the responsibility of the Home Office. We were initially surprised that ODPM was not represented on the Strategic Committee or the Operators Group. However, Mr Jamieson told us that:

    "I think it is an omission that the ODPM is not represented on the Strategic Group, and that is something I think we are going to put right."[14]

13. We are grateful for the Minister's indication that the ODPM will be represented on the UK SAR Strategic Committee in the future, and suggest that it should also be represented on the Operators Group.

Demand for SAR services

14. We were keen to establish whether demand for SAR services is likely to rise, fall or remain constant in the future. Estimates are essential to determine whether SAR capacity will be sufficient in years to come, especially if that capacity might vary unless action is taken. The MCA has traditionally assessed demand for maritime SAR by examining the number of reports to the Coastguard.[15] The official statistics in Table 1 show that the number of reports to the Coastguard increased by an average of 3.58% each year between 1998 and 2004, and by 23% overall over the same period.

Table 1: HM Coastguard incident reports since 1996

Year1998 19992000 20012002 20032004
Total Reports11,553 12,22012,016 12,51413,395 13,84914,240

Source: SAR 12B

15. The assessment method used previously by the MCA suggests that the trend for maritime SAR demand is certainly one of increase. The RNLI told us that demand was increasing for its services, year on year,[16] that there had been a growth in recreational boating, and that the increase in the number of people participating in hazardous water sports led to an increase in the number of people requiring assistance.[17] Mr Freemantle reported growth in the "Birmingham navy" of occasional sea-farers:

    "As people have more money they buy boats and they drive them to the coast at the weekend and perhaps do not know how to drive them on the sea as well as they should, and of course quite a number of our rescues are caused because of that and that is a trend."[18]

16. The Government admitted that anecdotal evidence suggested a rise in demand, but noted there was not a great deal of data. The MCA has commissioned research which should help calculate demand around the coast:

    "Although there is much anecdotal evidence that the number of people involved in leisure pursuits around the UK coast (including high-risk activities) is increasing (for example, the tourist boards provide some material which is a helpful indication of trends in this area), there are no reliable, comprehensive official statistics available. In 2004 the Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA) commissioned a research project to establish accident 'rates' by comparing the number of accidents against the numbers of people participating in leisure activities in a variety of areas around the coast. This work will be completed in April 2005 and will provide a more robust measure of risk and monitoring trends within this non-regulated sector."[19]

17. The MCA's research only covers the coast. On land, Dr Anthony S G Jones MBE, Vice Chairman of Mountain Rescue—England and Wales, told us that the number of people going out onto the hills and fells had increased, so the absolute number of people involved in incidents had increased.[20] He also suggested that new sports such as parapenting[21] and mountain biking on hard ground had increased the risk.[22] Mr Alan Riddet of the Chief Fire Officers Association suggested not only that more people were engaging in high-risk leisure activities, but that "there is great expectation from the public that when things go wrong, somebody will be there to deal with it."[23] He also acknowledged that data had to be gathered to prove the rising trend and that "we cannot just deal with that anecdotally".[24] Although Mr Robert Bradley of the UK Lowland Search Institute was understandably wary of the costs to voluntary organisations of collecting and managing statistics,[25] Mountain Rescue—England and Wales were able to tell us that the number of call-outs has increased by over 125 per year since 1999.[26] We believe the type of research which the MCA has commissioned for maritime SAR should be commissioned for inland SAR in order to help forecast demand.

18. The Government and the SAR Strategic Committee need to be able to forecast future demand for SAR services in order to assess the ability of SAR services to meet it. The MCA has commissioned useful research about accident levels around the coast, but more work is required inland. Data collection does not need to be particularly onerous, but the Strategic Committee must determine whether research should be commissioned or further information be collected by inland operators to better forecast demand for inland SAR.

Beach lifeguards

19. While the RNLI is most famous for its lifeboats, it also now provides beach lifeguards on 57 beaches under service level agreements with local authorities.[27] Local authorities make a contribution to the RNLI where the Institution provides this service, but it costs the RNLI £3m per year to run a service which employs 300 lifeguards.[28] Mr Freemantle told us that some local authorities were reluctant to continue to make a contribution to the RNLI when the time came to renew their service level agreements:

    "[T]hey try to back away and leave us holding the can, which is something that we are not very happy with and is stopping us doing it elsewhere."[29]

20. Mr Freemantle suggested that, even if the RNLI provided the lifesaving service, the local authority should retain overall responsibility for lifesaving on a beach because they made money out of car parking and other franchises there.[30] We have sympathy with his view, but we also understand that local authorities may not want to bind themselves to service level agreements which supply a service they are not legally obliged to provide. Mr Phil Hope MP, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State at the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM), agreed to look into the matter further, but explained that while local authorities might take into account the need for lifesaving services, there was no statutory requirement for local authorities to supply lifeguards.[31] The Government subsequently outlined to the Committee the arrangements for reporting local authorities which act outside their powers when managing contracts, which is not really the issue.[32]

21. We are grateful for Mr Hope's indication that the ODPM will consider further the problems caused when local authorities leave the RNLI in the lurch after it has been providing beach life guarding services. It would be useful for an ODPM Minister to meet representatives of local authorities and the RNLI to get to the bottom of the issue. Longer service level agreements between coastal local authorities and the RNLI might provide greater stability for the RNLI.


3   see map of UK Search and Rescue Region attached to SAR 13 Back

4   See Evans, C. (2003) Rescue at Sea: An International History of Lifesaving, Coastal Rescue Craft and Organisations, London, Conway Maritime Press Back

5   SAR 13, paragraph 2 Back

6   eg Q 175 Back

7   Q 178 Back

8   SAR 13, paragraph 1 Back

9   Q 356 Back

10   Queen's Printer and Controller, Search and Rescue Framework for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, June 2002, paragraph 7.2.2 Back

11   Q 166 Back

12   Q 294 Back

13   Q 357 Back

14   Q 388 Back

15   SAR 12B Back

16   Q 199 Back

17   Q 200 Back

18   Q 224 Back

19   SAR 12B Back

20   Q 86 Back

21   Parapenting is a sport in which the participant jumps from a high place wearing a modified type of parachute which is then used as a hang-glider. Back

22   Q 86 Back

23   Q 31 Back

24   Q 33 Back

25   SAR 01 Back

26   SAR 11 Back

27   SAR 09 Back

28   Q 213 Back

29   Q 218 Back

30   Q 217 Back

31   Qq 392-3 Back

32   SAR 12B Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 3 April 2005