APPENDIX 3
EAST OF ENGLAND PAGER ISSUES 28 MARCH 2005
— North Kent, Medway—team
members using personal mobile phones, originally requested four
x Ch O pagers, then not sure coverage would be sufficient, suggested
trial PageOne but wants to trial whole team, not just one pager.
Olan to provide PageOne trial pagers, have to request from Customer
service, extremely difficult to contact PageOne.
— Hull, Cleethorpes—Vodafone
Premier Pagers, poor coverage, using mobiles to back up pagers.
SO has trialed a Vodafone Flex pager—better. Plan to clarify
numbers with problems, check if any unused Vodafone pagers are
Flex to run proper trial with Flex. Could consider Vodafone MDS
option to mix half Premier half Flex. Also CH O used to be OK
on seafront.
— Clacton, all teams—short
of several pagers as not on original inventory return, plus are
in addition to current declared team levels. Aim to provide them
from the unused Vodafone pagers already within MCA—require
Equipment Proposal form.
— South Downs, Birling Gap/Seaford—3
team members with coverage problems. Offered mobile phones, SM
said may not be necessary. Due to get update on current status.
— Ipswich, SM—needs all
3 group nos. on his pager, have to require update from Vodafone.
— Wight, Bembridge/Ryde—few
coverage issues for 3 team members. Due to get update on current
status.
— East Sussex, Bexhill—coverage
issues reported for 2 team members. No further discussion had
yet.
— Whitby, Redcar—team requires
one more spare pager to be ordered.
— Bradwell and Southend, West
Mersea—screen crazed and blackened, not aware of any physical
damage, suggested it may be due to pressure when seated because
of size of pager.
— North Norfolk, Mundesley—possible
issue with displayed message in intrinsically safe pager. SM is
happy to deal with this when time.
— Lincolnshire, Mabelthorpe—request
to move Ch O repeater from Lowestoft to Mablethorpe. Do not know
if this has happened.
|
|
