Supplementary memorandum by the National
Coastwatch Institution (SAR 14B)
SEARCH AND RESCUE
National Coastwatch is concerned by some comments
and answers given by MCA to questions 331-337 in the uncorrected
transcript.
Q331/2/3. MCA answers are contradictory.
No need for lookouts but NCI is not wasting
its time?
The coastline cannot be properly surveyed from
MCA call centres. A visual watch is needed where possible.
We assume that NCI staff are included in the
many reports from "members of the public" referred to.
Over 150 were from NCI.
MCA is but one of several organisations to which
NCI responds.
Q334 MCA ceased its visual watch on the coast
amidst much protest. NCI fills this function and will expand at
no cost to the public purse. Our presence is appreciated by local
Coastguards, Customs, Police, fishermen, local and harbour authorities
and Lifeboat crews. Additionally, the public, whose increasing
leisure use of the coast is significant.
Q335 Training is not given to NCI by MCA. The
NCI training synopsis is appraised and agreed with MCA. (Another
contradiction).
Q336 Contradictions and inaccuracies are the
cause of cooler relationships at management level.
Q337 The dispute over Stations will continue.
A reply to questions formally placed with MCA is awaited. The
issue is wider than two Stations. No consultation was ever made
with NCI over feasibility studies. What are these?
We challenge the MCA comments and answers. Over
1000 trained NCI staff will be, justifiably, upset by the attitude
reflected in MCA replies to these questions from the Committee.
May we thank you for your attention and care
in these important matters. The Committee would be most welcome
at NCI Watchstations. Let us know when and where.
March 2005
| 
