Select Committee on Transport Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 140-161)

MR JON GIFFORD AND MR MARK DANSON-HATCHER

9 FEBRUARY 2005

  Q140 Mr Stringer: How do you do that?

  Mr Gifford: Basically, if you want to join the National Coastwatch and become a watchkeeper, you join the charity and it costs you nothing; you come in free. You do approximately 12 hours classroom training in a village hall or a facility that we can use. That would include what we call the basics: chart work, tides, weather, all the things you should see when you are looking out to sea and local knowledge. Having done that, as a trainee you would start a series of supernumerary watches. There are normally two trained watchkeepers on watch, but when we have supernumerary trainees they can come in.

  Q141 Mr Stringer: I hope you do not think this is a silly question, it is not meant to be: when they are watching do they look through binoculars? What do they actually do?

  Mr Gifford: We have binoculars, in most stations we have very powerful telescopes, times 60 magnification telescopes. The basic thing is that you look around and you scan with a decent set of binoculars. Our binoculars normally have an inbuilt compass so that if we did spot something we would have an instant bearing on it and then it is up to us to measure the distance, or calculate or even guess the distance, and report it if it is something important. The equipment is quite simple. There is a little skill in using a very powerful telescope; you must not touch it with your body otherwise your heartbeats start to make it blur a bit. Generally speaking the scanning is done with binoculars and we are constantly looking. People are taught not just to look out of the window but to notice what is going on. We have areas in each watch station where they know there are vulnerable areas and there may be a tidal stream or a tidal flow, a race or something which is known to be a hazard. We would scan that all the time. Normally, when we are really very busy, remember we are logging everything which comes past, we log it by date, time, type of yacht, vessel, direction it is sailing, any other details which may be relevant, so that if at some stage a vessel were lost the coastguard could come to us and ask whether yacht X came past us at all.

  Q142 Mr Stringer: Do your volunteers help to educate users of the coastal seas and the coast in the dangers they may be facing?

  Mr Gifford: We do not lecture to them, but we would be glad to advise and we get a lot of inshore sailors who phone us up and ask us about the weather, particularly diving teams. They would ask for a weather report on an area and if we know where they are going to dive, they will be a focus of attention. We will see how many go down, how many come up and we have had accidents diving.

  Q143 Mr Stringer: Is there any potential for that? Do you think people who are using the coasts and coastal waters know enough about it?

  Mr Gifford: That is a very good question. You can go to a boat builder and buy a boat with 1,000 horsepower engine underneath it and not even know how to tie the thing up to the quay. There is no law to stop you doing it. We see some frightening sights. You see an open inflatable boat going over quite a choppy sea with six kids in the back and the only person with a life jacket on will be the man driving it. This sort of thing we have no jurisdiction over, but we see it: windsurfers; jetskis.

  Q144 Mr Stringer: Would you report that? If you saw somebody doing something you did not think was sensible, would you report it or would you just note it?

  Mr Gifford: We would note it, because frankly if it is busy and we report it to the coastguard, they would ask what else we had to tell them. They have no jurisdiction either. We have a very tricky thing with the traffic separation scheme round Land's End. Our stations at Cape Cornwall and Gwennap Head around Land's End track every vessel which does this. It is just like driving up the motorway the wrong way. A lot of them, to save time and trouble, take shortcuts and it is dangerous and we report that. We do report any breach we see, but in fairness to the coastguard there is not that much they can do about it because they have apparently no legal power to enforce.

  Q145 Chairman: I am not going to argue with you, but they do in fact have the right to go back to those vessels. They are not short of means of communication.

  Mr Gifford: Oh, no.

  Q146 Chairman: I should have thought even the present coastguard officers could have explained in simple Anglo-Saxon terms frequently used by their predecessors that it was not a good idea.

  Mr Gifford: Certainly they can remind them, but they cannot take any legal action, as I understand it. I am not a lawyer, so I do not know.

  Q147 Miss McIntosh: I have noticed in countries like Denmark, which is as big a maritime country as we are, that they are very, very clear, in television broadcasts as well as radio broadcasts, on the state of the sea, the wind and weather forecast. Do you think we do enough in this country to inform people of that before they commence a journey?

  Mr Gifford: The small boat sailor, the yachtsman has to take care of himself to a large degree. He should have taken all the steps to ensure that the weather situation, as far as possible, was clear to him before he set out in the same way as the RNLI would tell you they should ensure their boats are fit to go out. We give weather reports to anybody who asks; we would give them a weather report. The coastguards do regular weather forecasts and we give weather reports round certain counties, in Devon and Cornwall, over the radio.

  Q148 Mrs Ellman: Are there any changes you would like to see in the way search and rescue operates?

  Mr Gifford: Generally speaking I do not think we have any particular comment or complaint to make about our contacts and, if we report an incident, the way it is handled by the coastguard. I am not in a position to say that we should have more lifeboats or more aeroplanes or whatever. We have had helicopters come to pick cows off cliffs which we have reported. It is a good exercise for the Royal Navy.

  Q149 Mrs Ellman: Would you say your work is valued by the other agencies and by government?

  Mr Gifford: Yes. I could take you to coastguard stations where the operations manager would say he does not know quite what he would do without our presence. The lifeboats are all for us. They are constantly complaining that we cannot talk to them direct, but that is a technical matter. Generally speaking some of our stations, without naming names, work more closely with the customs and police than they do with the coastguard. That is for another reason. Generally speaking we are well thought of and people know us for what we are. We are trained volunteers and that is all.

  Q150 Chairman: The Dart has been a very busy river for about 500 or 600 years. What has suddenly made Kingsweir of interest to you?

  Mr Gifford: The fact that the National Trust, having developed a site at the eastern mouth of the River Dart as an SSSI, have, after a lot of persuading, allowed us to occupy an old gunnery observation post.

  Q151 Chairman: That brings me very neatly to my next question. Is it true the Marine Agency are not too happy for you to use their redundant buildings?

  Mr Gifford: We have asked for several and we have been refused.

  Q152 Chairman: Could you give us a list of those?

  Mr Gifford: I could tell you two straight off the top of my head now, one at Berry Head overlooking Torbay and another one at Hengistbury Head overlooking Poole Bay.

  Q153 Chairman: What reasons were given?

  Mr Gifford: Radio equipment within the station.

  Q154 Chairman: The suggestion being that you were going to have one or two wild parties and wreck the equipment? I am beginning to see why the admirals join.

  Mr Gifford: I have never understood this. I dispute it to this day and I will do. I do not think their radios breathe CS gas, I do not think they are unsafe for their own people, so why they should be unsafe for our people I am not quite sure. We are in the middle of a debate on this subject.

  Q155 Chairman: Is it really a debate or is it a dialogue of the deaf? If you are shouting at the Marine Agency and they are not listening, you are not getting very far. How long ago did you get a refusal on these two? In the last two years, the last four years? How long ago?

  Mr Gifford: On 7 March last year we were given the go-ahead.

  Q156 Chairman: For which one?

  Mr Gifford: For Berry Head. I think it was in July that we were told that it was a radio station and we could not go in there. We have had a lot of correspondence over Hengistbury Head. Some of the local members of parliament have been lobbying for it as well. We do not go there to expand ourselves: it is the yacht clubs and the users of the sea which come to us and suggest we go in there and get on with it. Quite a lot of that is said. We would very much like to do it. There are probably more, but most of the stations we are taking over now are from private estates, National Trust, organisations of that sort. I have to say that the buildings do sometimes accommodate radio when we move in. There is no problem about that, because quite a lot of our watch stations are now participating in the police 02 airwave scheme around the coast and we have radios installed.

  Q157 Chairman: Is there a particular reason therefore why you cannot talk directly to the RNLI?

  Mr Gifford: We can talk to them, but talking on the radio means using channel zero and only in an absolute emergency would we be using channel zero. We have an agreement with the coastguard that that is an emergency operation only. We have to be trained and qualified in order to use it.

  Q158 Chairman: Do you get the sense that perhaps the Marine Agency is not taking the leisure sailor very seriously and therefore they are quite happy that you should stand in for them?

  Mr Gifford: I hope they are grateful for our assistance. We are not a rival organisation.

  Q159 Chairman: They might be grateful, but they are not overly grateful, are they, if they think you are not suitable to use their buildings for what seems to me to be a fairly innocent pursuit or a rather important service?

  Mr Gifford: Yes. That is a good point. The other point is that where we work on the ground day to day with the coastguard people—

  Q160 Chairman: No, you have explained to us and I am not asking you to make pejorative remarks. You have made it clear that you have a good relationship, but it is on a one-to-one basis and it is locally because most coastguard stations are very happy to have extra pairs of eyes and the men and women at the front end know that you are doing a useful job. Over and above that what is the problem? Is it that the MCA does not regard leisure sailors as of sufficient importance and therefore does not think the provision of extra eyes is an essential service?

  Mr Gifford: That is a question which one would have to ask them, but my view is that they are extremely busy with leisure sailors in the summer. Some of the coastguard stations, for instance the Solent, are at times almost overwhelmed.

  Q161 Chairman: Then would it not seem quite sensible really to talk you fair and to encourage you to do more work rather than less?

  Mr Gifford: I would welcome it.

  Chairman: That is quite helpful. Are there any other questions? Thank you both for coming, it has been very helpful. I am sorry, Mr Danson-Hatcher if I have not been asking you awkward questions, but doubtless the minute you have gone I shall think of all sorts of interesting things. Thank you very much for coming.





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 7 June 2005