Select Committee on Transport Written Evidence


Memorandum by Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council (LR 75)

INTEGRATED TRANSPORT:  THE FUTURE OF LIGHT RAIL AND MODERN TRAMS IN BRITAIN

  I write on behalf of Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council in support of the submission made by the GMPTA and the GMPTE.

THE STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE OF METROLINK

  We welcome the opportunity to submit supportive comments to the Committee on the future of light rail and in particular to stress its strategic importance to Oldham.

  Once the home of "King Cotton", with more workers per square mile than anywhere else in the world, Oldham is emerging from decades of industrial decline to a brighter future. Together with the rest of the Greater Manchester conurbation, Oldham has been part of a resurgence in the sub-regional economy, which has seen it jump five places in the deprivation league table, from 38th in 2000 to 43rd in 2004. This resurgence has largely been the result of organic growth with strong performance from local companies such as Zetec, Ferranti Technologies, Innovative Solutions, Park Cakes and Dunlopillow Slumberland.

  We recognise that the future prospects of Oldham are inextricably linked with the development of the sub-regional economy and the future strength of Manchester as the regional centre. In order to make the recent upturn in economic performance sustainable the benefits which light rail, through Metrolink, has brought to other parts of the conurbation needs to be replicated In Oldham. That is why Metrolink is a key element in our forthcoming Community Strategy:

    "City: A short Metrolink ride away will be Manchester City Centre and beyond, the Airport, Salford Quays and the Trafford Centre. The Greater Manchester Metrolink network will make people feel part of the wider city region and allow them to access all of its opportunities and facilities. They will have the skills to compete for the wide range of jobs which the conurbation can offer."

  For us, Metrolink will not simply be a nice thing to have or another important transport project, it is fundamental to secure the renaissance of Oldham and the regeneration of the Town Centre and key parts of our community.

AN INTEGRATED TRANSPORT SYSTEM

  We would wholeheartedly support the comments made in the GMPTA/GMPTE submission regarding the importance of light rail being part of an integrated transport system. We would see Metrolink providing the key access route to Manchester City Centre and its main rail line stations, the Airport and key employment sites such as the East Manchester and Kingsway Business Parks. If Metrolink does not replace the Oldham Loop line then the existing Heavy Rail route would need a large and continuing capital investment to allow continued use. This expenditure would not bring any of the benefits that would attach to Metrolink, particularly the diversion of route through Oldham Town Centre.

  However, we must emphasise that we have not been sitting back waiting for the dream of Metrolink to happen. As a Highway Authority we have been actively pursuing the investment to make an integrated transport system a reality and taking a robust approach to the implementation of projects that will support and complement the Metrolink network.

  The GMPTA/GMPTE submission points to the fact that certain Quality Bus Corridors will provide high frequency, high quality services that will feed Metrolink. Reference is made to the Huddersfield Road corridor east of Oldham that will serve a bus/light rail interchange at Mumps, complemented by the parallel Lees Road route. However, that is only part of the story, we are proud to be at the forefront of the introduction of Quality Bus Corridors in Greater Manchester and the development of them along each of our major radial routes to Ashton, Royton and Chadderton will help to support the creation of an integrated network. The advent of Metrolink will help to complete the circle and ensure that a quality public transport alternative is available along all of the key transport corridors that access Oldham Town Centre.

AN INTEGRATED APPROACH TO REGENERATION

  We have already outlined the strategic importance of Metrolink. This is particularly so when viewed in the context of the main aim of the Council, as outlined in the Corporation Plan: Regeneration through Community Cohesion.

  Metrolink will offer significantly improved access for Oldham residents to a much wider range of jobs not only in the City Centre but also at Kingsway and Central Manchester Business Park (both served by the Oldham/Rochdale Metrolink).

  Metrolink has also been a central plank of our regeneration plans set out in "Oldham Beyond"—a strategy for the future regeneration of Oldham agreed by the Council, the Oldham Partnership and the Regional development Agency. Its potential impact will be felt all the way along the route. Key reasons why abandoning the scheme now creates problems for regeneration are:

Failsworth

  Major investment in town centre needed to restore confidence in the area.

  Town centre lies on the boundary between the (relatively) prosperous southern part of the town and the HMR area to the north. Metrolink would serve this area and provide a focus for renewal and investment that will help secure the commitment of the proposed new anchor supermarket to the new town centre.

Hollinwood

  Already the home of the Daily Mirror's northern operations and chosen as the new headquarters location for Northern Counties Housing Association, Hollinwood is currently the focus of a new joint study with EP and NWDA to secure the regeneration of what is potentially an extremely well located site on the M60, some 20 minutes from the Airport and, with Metrolink 10 minutes from the City Centre with a frequency of 10 trams an hour. Without Metrolink, access to the City Centre is restricted to a half hourly link to Victoria Station and a walk/transfer to tram taking, on average 18 minutes.

Werneth/Freehold

  One of the two first HMR areas, the area is currently not well served by the heavy rail network because of the difficulty in providing stops on what is in railway terms a steep incline. The improved performance of Metrolink means that it will be possible to provide two new stops that will significantly enhance the attractiveness of the area. One stop that is immediately adjacent to Hartford Mill is seen as being the one key factor that will encourage the conversion of this listed building to housing use. Without this conversion the only way forward is likely to involve the demolition of the building.

Town Centre

  The existing heavy rail serves the town centre very poorly. The topography of the area means that the train cannot get into the town centre and instead follows a peripheral route alongside the town centre ring road. Although served by two stations, both are 15 minutes walk uphill and both involve crossing the ring road.

  Metrolink, with its superior performance is able to climb further up the hill into the town centre and an alignment has been protected for it for some years. This alignment has been largely cleared so that work could start as quickly as possible once the scheme was approved, to be followed by a number of new developments which would capitalise on the improved accessibility offered by Metrolink to help secure the regeneration of the town centre. Cancelling Metrolink will create enormous uncertainty in respect of these developments.

Derker

  The second of the two HMR areas, the area around Derker station is seen as one of the key regeneration pump primers in the Derker area, capitalising on the improved accessibility that Metrolink will offer and encouraging the redevelopment of marginal industrial areas around the existing station for high density Metrolink related residential development.

Shaw

  Another local centre with considerable potential where the uncertainty caused by the cancellation of Metrolink will not help to encourage new investment.

  This list highlights the extent to which going back on the decision to convert the Oldham/Rochdale line to Metrolink will create uncertainty and make it even more difficult to stimulate Regeneration in Oldham. In the Oldham situation the position is compounded by the fact that Metrolink is essentially taking over an existing railway alignment. This route has been starved of investment and forward planning simply because its future was seen as an integral part of the Metrolink network. Cancelling Metrolink is therefore not a do nothing option in the case of Oldham which compounds the uncertainty.

  This demonstrates that the importance of Metrolink in the golden thread which links together various elements of the regeneration agenda is well understood locally in Oldham and in Greater Manchester. It is true to say that it is also understood by parts of central Government, such as ODPM, and national and regional agencies such as English Partnerships and the North West Development Agency.

  Central Government is often imploring Local Government to get its act together and operate in a more joined up way. We would assert that has been achieved in progressing the regeneration agenda for Oldham within the Greater Manchester context. It also links in quite strongly to the visions set out by the ODPM in "the Northern Way".

  The Department of Transport now has a real opportunity to take a significant step towards realising plans developed between agencies over the last decade. We believe that the integration of light rail investment with other spending plans, and the added value that provides to regeneration, needs to be a key element of the Committee's deliberations.

  I would commend the GMPTA/GMPTE submission to you and I hope that the information contained herein helps the Committee in understanding the fundamental importance of Metrolink to the continued renaissance of Oldham and other parts of the Greater Manchester conurbation. I realise that the Committee is working to a tight timescale but I would be more than willing to expand on the issues outlined above if the Committee decides to seek the submission of further evidence or testimony.

Andrew Kilburn

Chief Executive

February 2005



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 10 August 2005