Select Committee on Transport Written Evidence


Supplementary memorandum by Tramtrack Croydon Ltd (LR 16A)

INTEGRATED TRANSPORT: THE FUTURE OF LIGHT RAIL AND MODERN TRAMS

  Tramtrack Croydon Ltd (TCL) provided oral evidence at the above Transport Select Committee inquiry on Wednesday 9 March 2005. The following are key points that Tramtrack Croydon would like to clarify to the committee.

    —  Tramtrack Croydon Ltd is making an operating profit and is the only method of public transport in London not subject to an operating subsidy.[33]

    —  Despite small build over-runs, transferring the risk to the private sector means no additional cost will be borne by the public or taxpayer—PFI worked.

    —  TCL business case relied on diversion from buses, car and train. Estimates of passenger numbers varied between 25 and 28 million based on differing assumptions. TCL find it astonishing that more bus miles are being run in the Tramlink area since the contract was let. Many of the increases are on services, which compete for passengers with Tramlink. Not only are there plentiful buses on parallel routes but for the first four years after opening the cash and day pass bus fare rates were between 20% and 30% cheaper than the tram. These had a direct effect on achieving our passenger figures forecasts. TfL eventually harmonised fares in early 2004 causing an immediate increase in patronage in excess of 2 million (12%) giving total passenger journeys of more than 22 million per annum. Tramlink's view is that restructuring the buses as intended would feed in excess of 3 million additional passengers onto Tramlink giving a total volume in excess of 25 million. Suggesting that patronage forecasts could be met.

    —  TCL welcomes the success of Nottingham's restructured bus routes. After just one-year patronage on trams have exceeded expectations.

    —  Consumers/constituents want integrated transport not competing transport that is wasteful and expensive. This should be easily achievable in London's regulated market. TCL does not understand why TfL subsidises buses to compete with Tramlink and pays TCL compensation for the abstraction of passengers.

    —  Trams are the cheapest way to get high volumes of passengers from A to B for journey numbers in excess of 3,000 per peak hour.

    —  Further schemes/extensions will be efficient and attractive to customers if the right conditions are met. These are:

      —  Integrated transport system—integrated fares, good interchanges, feeder not competing buses, park and ride, cycle and walkways.

      —  Predictable and consistent policy making—no unpredictable risks.

      —  Transparent and consistent regulation of transport based on partnership (this has not been the case for Tramlink Croydon).

    —  A successful integrated and regulated transport environment in London/Croydon can be replicated across the UK

    —  TCL do not understand why it has not been consulted at all on Tramlink extensions where the Concessionaire has extensive experience to share. Extensions can only be achieved with TCL co-operation.

March 2005




33   to the best knowledge of TCL. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 10 August 2005