Select Committee on Transport Written Evidence


Memorandum by the Corporation of London (LU 06)

PERFORMANCE OF LONDON UNDERGROUND

  1.  It is understood that the committee is examining four areas of performance under the PPP: whether it has delivered an acceptable level of performance for customers; whether safe operation has been maintained; whether it has provided value for money; and, whether operation has been effectively coordinated between Transport for London (TfL), London Underground Ltd (LUL) and the Infracos. The Corporation of London is not in a position to judge safety and value for money elements of the PPP so the comments below are limited to performance and coordination from the Corporation's perspective.

PERFORMANCE

  2.  The Corporation has not noticed any deterioration in performance due to the PPP system, but an apparent higher level of line closures, particularly the District Line within the City of London, has been an inconvenience to passengers. It is accepted, however, that these closures are predominantly due to improvements that are being made to the track. As long as these closures are well coordinated and managed they need not be seen as a negative factor.

  3.  There are other examples of improvements to passengers' experiences on the network, particularly the reduced number of trains in service with graffiti and reduced litter on trains. The Corporation has no evidence of any problems with the passenger/staff interface under the new system.

COORDINATION

  4.  Corporation officers have noticed a marked improvement in this area since this introduction of the PPP. Whilst the precise reason for this is not clear, it has been suggested that this may be due to the London Underground staff now being more focused on one aspect of the business.

  5.  On day-to-day issues London Underground has been much more open and allowed Corporation officers to have direct contact with line managers where necessary to discuss particular issues. In particular, LUL responded promptly to address a specific issue regarding a problem with drainage at Waterloo. When severe disruption occurs LUL has introduced a system under which Corporation officers are telephoned. Whilst this arrangement is still experiencing teething difficulties, it is a welcome step. In addition, the Corporation continues to have regular meetings with a liaison officer from LUL. This is a longstanding arrangement with which the Corporation is very satisfied. The introduction of the PPP did not appear to have any negative effect on this officer's ability to deal with concerns effectively.

  6.  LUL staff have been proactive about informing the Corporation of arrangements during closures, and officers were given the opportunity to comment on the information given to customers about alternative routes for each of the stations during the District Line closure. The Corporation has found it useful to be able to give comment and for officers to be informed of arrangements.

  7.  Corporation officers were initially frustrated by late notice of closures or service alterations at a stage when it was often too late for substantial input. This was particularly found to be a problem with the early termination of the Great Northern trains into Moorgate to allow escalators at this station to be replaced. To the credit of the LUL staff, once it was acknowledged that the Corporation had a valid interest in this issue, they were happy to attend meetings with the Corporation and provide officers with their modelling of passenger movements around the station until the Corporation was satisfied that the best compromise was being taken forward. Since that time, LUL have been more amenable and officers have been pleased to have been notified at an early stage on matters such as the closures on the Waterloo and City Line planned for next year. Corporation officers are hopeful that this positive attitude to partnership working will continue into the future.

  8.  On longer term issues, Corporation officers have found LUL staff very willing to work in partnership to evaluate possible future scenarios. There has already been some work to develop a masterplan for Bank station and a joint a horizon study looking at possible longer term improvements on the Waterloo and City Line is planned for next year.

City Remembrancer's Office

December 2004





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 18 March 2005