Select Committee on Trade and Industry Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 312 - 319)

TUESDAY 20 JULY 2004

ENTERPRISE INNS PLC

  Q312  Chairman: Good morning, gentlemen. Perhaps you could introduce your colleagues, Mr Tuppen, and then we will begin.

  Mr Tuppen: Certainly. Can I introduce Gordon Harrison on my right—he is my Operations Director—and Simon Townsend, my Customer Service Director on my left. Can I start off by thanking you for inviting us along today and give you a tiny background on Enterprise? We formed Enterprise in 1991, buying 368 pretty dreadful pubs from one of the major brewers. By the time we floated on the Stock Exchange in 1995 we had tidied those up a bit and bought a few more, so we had an estate of 500. Since then we have grown, through acquisition, and we have an estate of 8,500 pubs now. We are now a FTSE 100 company and our market cap is nearly £2 billion. We have several thousand shareholders, individuals, major pension funds, and we are committed as a company to being the leading specialist operator of leased and tenanted pubs in the UK. Without the leased and tenanted sector the industry would be dominated by the large branded managed house chains and individuals who could afford to pay half a million or more for a pub. We are proud to have continued a tradition where the 33,000 leased and tenanted pubs in the UK offer a well-established low entry cost opportunity for entrepreneurial licensees to create individual pub businesses generating real profit and real value. Without doubt, we believe this vibrant sector has made a huge contribution to the massive improvement in pub quality and consumer choice in both pubs and products that we have seen over the past 10 years.

  Q313  Chairman: I suppose the only thing about that is that you are not selling as much beer and fewer people are going to the pubs?

  Mr Tuppen: I think that fashions change all the time, and I think one of the nice things about having such a diverse pub chain is that you can watch these changes over time. Some pubs will shift from being predominantly beer-led to offering more food; some will continue to concentrate on beers and lagers. Certainly the days have gone when after a day working in the steel works, for example, the average worker would drink 10 pints of beer then go home for a shower and then come out for a drink in the evening. So fashions have changed, but people are drinking probably more expensive products than they used to, higher quality, but perhaps not the volume that they used to.

  Q314  Chairman: They are not drinking them in pubs either in quite the same way. The licence trade, the off-licence, seems to have increased, has it not? Is there any relationship between the fact that you own pubs and the amount of beer that is being drunk? The importance of drinking at home has increased.

  Mr Tuppen: I think this is a trend that has been going on from way before Enterprise Inns was formed. I think that as social patterns change, as being at home with videos and Sky television and the many other things that people can have in the home, I think that makes it perhaps more comfortable for some people to stay at home. Certainly beer in supermarkets some might regard as unreasonably cheap. Just moving into a slightly different area, we are certainly facing a situation where the Government, I know, are very concerned about alcohol strategy, Alcohol Harm Reduction Strategy, and 50p a pint for some pretty strong lager, or whatever, in supermarkets needs to be taken into consideration when we are looking at that particular area.

  Q315  Chairman: We are going to come back to that in a wee while; it was just a point I thought should be raised. Some of the concerns that we have had to address so far have been the views of tenants that, while they may well be given an opportunity to flex their entrepreneurial muscles, as it were, it has been suggested to us—and the difficulty here is that we are asking you about allegations that are made by people who may not be your tenants and, therefore, it may not be relevant, but on the other hand it will give you the opportunity to tell us how you handle your tenants. We get the impression that, in some instances at least, the tenants are little better than innocents abroad, insofar as they are not really given the kind of information that they should have before they enter into the agreements with pubcos. What kind of financial information on a particular tenancy do you offer to prospective tenants? What proportion of this is factual, that is to say based on previous accounts, and what are estimates, adjustments, and projections? Can we start with that?

  Mr Tuppen: Yes, I am very happy to answer that. I think I have to answer that in two parts. There are the new tenants who join us, and they are either becoming a member of the industry for the first time or they are just joining us. There are new tenants who join us by taking an assignment from an existing tenant. I think, as far as the new tenant joining us actually taking a lease from us is concerned, it is relatively clear-cut. We provide full historic barrelage information, full price-lists and, of course, the lease itself, which details the rent payable, the review process and all the other relevant details. Your point about lambs to the slaughter—I do not think those were quite your words but I think that was your inference—some two-thirds of our tenants actually come with an average of five years' trade experience. That does mean, of course, that one-third of them are indeed new to the industry. When they are going to join us there then follow a series of meetings, including a full screening interview which consists of an audit of the applicant's key skills.

  Q316  Linda Perham: When you say "five years' trading experience", do you mean actually running a pub or working in a pub?

  Mr Tuppen: By that I mean running a pub.

  Q317  Linda Perham: Running a pub?

  Mr Tuppen: Yes. These meetings include pub viewings, a review of the licensee's business plan—that sort of thing—and I would like to point out that we want successful licensees, so we are prepared to share everything we have to make sure this new licensee has the best chance of being successful. It might interest you to know as well that so far this year we have rejected 167 applicants for reasons of funding, suitability or ability to hold a licence. So we do not just take on anyone; we do work very hard to make sure that these people are suitable.

  Q318  Chairman: How many have you accepted?

  Mr Tuppen: During that time, Gordon, how many new leases have we offered?

  Mr Harrison: If I can give a statistic from the year ending September 2003, we had 416 new entrants into the business during that year.

  Q319  Chairman: So that if the numbers are roughly about the same, you are saying that you reject one in three?

  Mr Tuppen: There would be many more rejected prior to interview, because some people, even on the basis of their submissions—

  Chairman: Do you think you could give us some figures on that? I am not trying to trick you today, but I think that when you give us one bit of a statistic it is tantalising; it is a bit like the tip of an iceberg: we do not know how big or small it is underneath.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 14 March 2005