Select Committee on Trade and Industry Written Evidence


APPENDIX 19

Memorandum by INEOS Chlor Ltd, INEOS Fluor Ltd and European Vinyls Corporation

CONTENTS

  1. Executive summary

  2. Rising prices of wholesale gas in the UK

  3. The effects of high gas prices on INEOS and EVC

  4. The effects of high gas prices on the UK economy

  5. The OFGEM investigation: Probe Into Gas Prices

  6. What is wrong with the UK gas market?

  7. Short term recommendations to correct the UK gas market

  8. Recommendations for a competitive European market

  Annex 1—Comparison of UK and European Wholesale Gas Prices

  Annex 2—Price Trends: Delivered Gas in Continental Europe

  Annex 3—Gas Export Data (Source DTI)

  Annex 4—Comparison of UK and German Electricity Prices

  Annex 5—Background to INEOS and EVC

  Annex 6—The Wholesale Gas Market

1.  EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  1.1 INEOS Chlor Limited, INEOS Fluor Limited and European Vinyls Corporation (EVC) are major chemical companies operating throughout Europe. We are able to provide evidence on behalf of all three companies based on extensive and comprehensive knowledge of the gas and electricity markets in which the companies operate. Our evidence is based on first hand experience and demonstrates that the UK gas market is failing to deliver competitively priced energy to UK industrial consumers.

  1.2 INEOS Chlor is based in Runcorn, Cheshire where we produce 80% of the UK's chlorine and caustic soda. The manufacture of chlorine is energy intensive. We purchase approximately 250 million therms of natural gas per year, which is used to produce electricity.

  1.3 INEOS Fluor and European Vinyls Corporation Ltd (EVC) are part of the INEOS group of companies and also operate from the site in Runcorn. These businesses are not as energy intensive but are dependent on the chemicals produced by INEOS Chlor.

  1.4 Our main concerns are:

    —  Industrial consumers, such as us and other energy intensive users, are particularly impacted by wholesale gas prices.

    —  Gas prices in the UK wholesale forward market have rapidly become extremely uncompetitive in comparison to Continental Europe. Cost increases cannot be passed on to our customers or our products will be procured elsewhere.

    —  It is essential for businesses to be able to purchase competitive energy for future delivery in order to manage risk. This is currently impossible in the UK. We sell a significant proportion of our product at prices agreed ahead of time; we therefore require the ability to purchase gas in a similar way.

  1.5 As industrial consumers, we require a "level playing field". We believe wholeheartedly in the principle of a free market but also believe that the UK gas market has become uncompetitive. The actual price of wholesale gas is less of an issue; it is the growing differential with Continental Europe that will make our businesses uncompetitive.

  1.6 It is our view that the forward wholesale market is currently "broken". Very urgent action is required to correct this very serious threat to UK competitiveness.

  1.7 We believe that this situation is being primarily driven by a distortion in the supply/demand balance in the forward market. This is being caused by a trend by gas producers to withdraw from "supplying" gas in to that market for a number of reasons.

  1.8 Our evidence sets out some of these reasons. We have also given our views on the actions required both in the short and medium term to ensure that a properly functioning and competitive market is restored in the UK, to meet the long term interests of UK manufacturing.

  1.9 In particular we would recommend the following short term actions:

    —  Suppliers should be required to make available the same pricing structure in the UK as in Continental Europe.

    —  The reasons for producers abandoning the forward market should be examined and changes made to encourage participation.

    —  Short-term controls should be placed on the use of the Interconnector.

2.  RISING PRICES OF WHOLESALE GAS IN THE UK

  2.1 The UK forward gas price has more than doubled in the past two years. In the same period, the wholesale gas price in Continental Europe has not risen to the same extent with the result that the UK forward gas price is now much more expensive than the equivalent Continental European price. In October 2004, UK forward wholesale gas prices were more than 40% higher than Continental Europe (Annex 1).

  2.2 Our experience of purchasing gas in several European countries enables us to make direct comparisons of gas prices across Europe. In Annex 2 we have shown the changes in the price of delivered gas from 2003 to 2005. We have shown these alongside the prices we would have paid in the UK for equivalent contract arrangements at similar size sites.

  2.3 The simple explanation given for rising gas prices is a combination of dwindling UK reserves, a move towards the UK becoming a net importer of gas and rising crude oil prices. This position has been officially put forward by the DTI in written responses to INEOS Chlor, in response to Parliamentary Questions and has often been reported in these most basic terms in the general media. However, these are not the key reasons and we would point out:

    —  The UK remains a net exporter of gas. DTI data shows the UK has been a net exporter of gas since the Interconnector to Zeebrugge opened in 1998 with record exports in 2003. (Annex 3).

    —  Even when the UK is a net importer of gas, the UK will source all of its gas from geographically local sources in contrast to the rest of Europe. At worst UK prices should only be as high as prices in Continental Europe.

    —  Continental European gas prices are linked to oil and this has caused only moderate increases in continental prices over the past two years. During the same period UK forward gas prices have almost doubled.

  2.4 Given our knowledge of European Gas prices and our significant consumption, we have tried to purchase non-UK gas for delivery to our UK Sites. It has proved extremely difficult, and in most cases impossible, for us as a consumer to overcome a large number of logistical and commercial obstacles in order to bring non-UK gas into the UK system for our consumption. Where we have managed to solve the logistical issues, we have discovered that the commercial offers end up with a price delivered to our site in the UK, which is no better than the general UK market price, even though the price for the same gas on the Continent is considerably lower.

  2.5 OFGEM and the UK Offshore Operators Association (UKOOA) have stated that there is a need for high gas prices in order to encourage investment in new sources of supply and infrastructure. Major gas producers have told us that a gas price of 20 ppt is all that is required to justify such investment and yet the prices currently quoted for supply in 2005 is almost double this figure. This is supported by economic studies by Wood Mackenzie.

  2.6 From our experience of the European energy markets it is clear to us that the UK gas market is now failing to deliver competitively priced energy versus Continental Europe.


3.  THE EFFECTS OF HIGH GAS PRICES ON INEOS AND EVC

  3.1  INEOS Chlor requires competitively priced energy. Our concern is less about the fact that prices have risen and more that the UK forward gas market has become much less competitive than Continental Europe. We need a level playing field in comparison to Continental Europe.

  3.2  We operate in a highly competitive commodity European chemical market.

  3.3  We are unable to manage fundamental business risk. As commodity chemical producers, we typically sell a significant proportion of our production at prices agreed ahead of time. As such, we require the ability to purchase the materials required to make these products in order that we can manage the business risk. Given the high price differentials between the UK and Continental Europe we are prevented from doing this—the price differentials we have seen would have broadly wiped out our profits. Instead we are faced with the only alternative, to "take a bet" that the "spot" price on the day will be lower and competitive with prices in Continental Europe.

  3.4  In the event that prices on the prompt or "spot" market are also uncompetitive then we would be faced with difficult choices in order to minimise the impact. These include:

    —  Passing price increases through to customers. However, it is generally not possible to pass on price increases or our products (and our customers' products) will be sourced elsewhere in Europe.

    —  Seeking to reduce our production volumes such that we only produce products which generate margin.

    —  In the case of EVC, because we operate plants making the same products in different countries, transferring production from the UK to Germany or Italy.

    —  Reducing other costs, in particular through lowering fixed costs and/or reducing business investment.

4.  THE EFFECTS OF HIGH GAS PRICES ON THE UK ECONOMY

  4.1  The Chemical Industry is of central importance to UK manufacturing industry, accounting for about 11% of manufacturing gross output, and about 230,000 jobs. The chlor-alkali sector in turn is of central importance to the Chemical Industry.

  4.2  If the INEOS Chlor business were to close there would be immediate impact on 10,000 jobs in UK chemicals (4% of the sector) with longer-term loss of 19% of chemical manufacturing jobs in the UK. Industry revenue losses are estimated to reach about £8 billion per year over that period.

(Source—LECG evaluation of options for Runcorn (Sept 2001).

  4.3  The rising gas price also has a direct impact on the cost of electricity in the UK. A marked price differential has opened up between the UK and Continental European wholesale electricity prices (Annex 4). This has an impact on our businesses and on our customers in the UK.

  4.4  The increase in gas prices will make power generation by other fuels more attractive. As a result a degree of fuel switching will take place (to coal and oils), which will result in higher levels of CO2 emissions. This is in direct conflict with the Government's four guiding principles set out in the Energy White Paper.

5.  THE OFGEM INVESTIGATION: PROBE INTO GAS PRICES

  5.1  INEOS Chlor was disappointed with the OFGEM report into rising wholesale gas prices that was published on 5 October 2004. Whilst we endorse some of the major findings in the body of the report, we believe that the summary of the report was misleading as it put the wrong emphasis on the causes of price increases, most of which remain unexplained.

  5.2  The interim report issued in May 2004, focused on increases in the prompt (spot price) market during Q4 2003. While the final report in October 2004 did consider the futures market it is our view that this was not treated as central to the investigation. Further, we note there are a number of areas of investigation, which have not been fully concluded.

  5.3  OFGEM states that in their opinion rising oil prices only account for around 30% of the increase in gas price for Q1 2005. Around 50% of the increase seen at the time the report could only be explained as "market sentiment".

  5.4  We do not accept, and the report does not conclude, that the most significant reason for the increasing UK gas prices is as a result of increasing oil prices. It is unfortunate therefore that graphs used in the report have been used to illustrate a simplistic, linear correlation between rising crude oil prices and those in the forward gas market.

  5.5  We welcome that the report highlighted concerns at the lack of competition in the Continental European market and the possibility that contractually available gas may not have been released to the UK market. We share these concerns and believe that there are specific issues created when two markets operate side by side with different levels of liberalisation.

6.  WHAT IS WRONG WITH THE UK GAS MARKET?

  6.1  It is our view that the UK's forward gas market is "broken". The structure and operation of the market is failing the UK's intensive industrial users. The UK remains a net exporter of gas to Continental Europe. It is therefore, in our view, inexplicable for wholesale prices to be higher in the UK than are available to industrial consumers within the EU. A properly functioning forward market is essential for a "UK type" gas market to work.

  6.2  Major gas producers have told us that they are increasingly reluctant to sell their gas in the forward market. This creates a supply shortfall in the forward market, which drives up prices. The reasons given by producers for this change of behaviour are:

    —  They are less willing to sell forward in case they have production problems. They see any forward selling as a potential risk. They do not see a need to sell forward as they are confident they can sell their production output in the very short-term markets if required.

    —  Major gas producers now measure themselves at Stock Market level against their global peers who do not sell forward.

    —  The current tax regime on gas production is based on prompt prices and this encourages producers to sell into this market rather than sell forward.

  6.3  Producers and consumers do not have equal access to market sensitive information within the wholesale gas market. This view has recently been made by amongst others British Gas and undermines the view that the UK gas market is truly competitive as the current structure operates to the detriment of consumers.

  6.4  We have also heard comments in Continental Europe that would suggest the problems with the UK forward market are a good reason for resisting change to the continental markets. It is hard to imagine how the current situation acts as an incentive for European governments to accept the type of market reforms that the UK administration is pushing within the EU.

  6.5  We believe there are issues with the regulation of the UK market. There seem to be a number of agencies (DTI, OFGEM, FSA) leading to a fragmented regulatory structure, which is far from clear to gas consumers.

7.  SHORT TERM RECOMMENDATIONS TO CORRECT THE UK GAS MARKET

  7.1  As previously noted, our main concern is that the UK forward market is failing to deliver competitive pricing. We are seeking action to correct this so that we can compete on a level playing field within the chemicals market.

  7.2  While Europe moves towards an open and competitive market we believe short-term action is required to correct the immediate issues with operation of the UK market.

  7.3  Suppliers should be required to make available the same contracts to UK consumers as those available to customers in Continental Europe.

  7.4  Action should be taken to encourage participation in the forward markets. The reasons that producers give for abandoning the forward market should be examined and if necessary changes made to encourage their participation.

  7.5  There should be immediate controls on use of the Interconnector. These might include:

    —  Restricting exports through the Interconnector such that in any year exports should not be allowed to exceed imports.

    —  Making a part of the Interconnector available to consumers at a reasonable price so that we would be able to source European gas and deliver it to the UK.

8.  RECOMMENDATIONS FOR A COMPETITIVE EUROPEAN MARKET

  8.1  We fundamentally believe in free markets but there are a number of improvements that need to be addressed in order to make the gas market function properly.

  8.2  Further action is required to ensure there are equal levels of liberalisation in Continental Europe and the UK.

  8.3  For the market to function competitively, equal information must be made available to all participants. The new information recently made available does not go far enough and we note the ongoing efforts of Energywatch in this regard. Information asymmetry is a well-known cause of market failure in traded markets.

  8.4  There needs to be unitary regulation of the gas market from wellhead to supply point.

  8.5  Efforts should be made to encourage new supplies of gas to the UK.

  8.6  Investment in additional storage capacity should be encouraged so as to make the costs of storage competitive. It would appear that storage operators have been able to substantially increase revenues from sale of storage due to the relative scarcity of storage capacity in the UK.

Annex 1

COMPARISON OF UK AND EUROPEAN WHOLESALE GAS PRICES


Annex 2

PRICE TRENDS: DELIVERED GAS FROM CONTINENTAL EUROPE

  A comparison of the future prices of wholesale delivered gas from Italy and Germany and equivalent contract arrangement in the UK. This data excludes taxes:



Annex 3

GAS EXPORT DATA (SOURCE DTI)


Annex 4

COMPARISON OF UK AND GERMAN ELECTRICITY PRICES


Annex 5

BACKGROUND TO INEOS AND EVC

  INEOS Chlor is based in Runcorn, Cheshire where we produce 80% of the UK's chlorine and caustic soda. These products are vital building blocks in the production of most chemicals made in the UK. Chlorine is used to purify 98% of our national water consumption, to produce 96% of crop protection products and 85% of pharmaceuticals. It is also a major raw material for the manufacture of plastics. Caustic is used in every major chemical production process and is essential to a wide range of everyday products including soap, cosmetics, clothes, antiseptics and cleaning products. INEOS Chlor has around 1,400 direct employees based in Cheshire.

  The manufacture of chlorine is energy intensive. INEOS Chlor purchases energy in the form of natural gas, which is used to produce electricity for use in the chlorine production process (electrolysis of brine).

  INEOS Chlor purchases around 250 million therms per year of natural gas for use in the Runcorn manufacturing activities. As such we understand we are probably in the top three of industrial consumers (by volume) in the UK, outside the power generation sector. Natural gas represents some 60% of the total business variable production costs. Every penny added to the wholesale cost of gas increases our production costs by some £2.5 million.

  INEOS Fluor and European Vinyls Corporation Ltd (EVC), which are both part of the INEOS group of companies, also have operations within the same site at Runcorn. While these businesses are not as energy intensive as INEOS Chlor, energy is a significant cost. More importantly, these businesses are extremely dependent on the chemicals produced by INEOS Chlor. Runcorn site is the home of a number of other companies including APL, BOC and High Chemicals that again are dependent on the chemicals produced by INEOS Chlor.

  INEOS Chlor and EVC also have manufacturing assets located in France, Germany and Italy as well as several smaller UK sites. The various sites consume significant amounts of energy in the form of both natural gas and electricity.

Annex 6

THE WHOLESALE GAS MARKET

  The delivered price of gas to consumers is a combination of the wholesale price and the cost of delivering the gas. As industrial consumers our price depends very largely on the wholesale price of the gas (the commodity price).

  Wholesale gas can be bought in the UK market through "Forward" contracts or in the "spot" market where the price is determined every day. Typically industrial customers will buy gas with a mixture of contracts, using forward contracts to manage price risk and "spot" contracts to reduce costs, as these are traditionally around one penny per therm (ppt) cheaper.

  Our particular concern is with the operation of the UK "forward" gas market. It is essential that we make like for like comparisons between markets and comparing wholesale gas prices across European markets best does this. For example delivered prices are very easily distorted by delivery costs, which vary with the size and location of the consuming site. In particular, domestic prices in the UK may still look quite competitive relative to prices in Continental Europe, but this is because higher wholesale prices are hidden by lower transportation costs in the UK.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 1 June 2005