Select Committee on Trade and Industry Written Evidence


APPENDIX 3

Supplementary memorandum by British Gas

1.  INTRODUCTION

  1.1  Following our initial submission dated 18 June 2004 and our oral evidence on 22 June, British Gas would like to submit supplementary evidence for the Committee's consideration.

  1.2  We were invited by the Committee to provide further information on three areas, namely on:

    —  the level of bad debt write off, and

    —  the cost of processing debt split by gas and electricity,

    —  a breakdown of warrant outcomes.

  1.3  The supplementary evidence also addresses a number of other key points that were raised during the hearing and which we hope will provide further background and clarification.

2.  BRITISH GAS' RESPONSE TO SPECIFIC QUESTIONS RAISED DURING THE HEARING

  2.1  The level of gross bad debt write off for British Gas in 2003 was £62 million, covering both gas and electricity and representing just over 1% of turnover.

  2.2  The cost of processing gas and electricity debt is estimated at *, of which approx. * relates solely to the application and execution of warrants of entry.

  2.3  The apportionment of processing costs between gas and electricity equates approximately to * and * respectively. Charges not directly related to the management of live debt have not been included, eg bad debt charges, fraud.

  2.4  The total number of warrants executed for gas was 48,115 and for electricity was 12,462 (total 60,577). Annex A provides a breakdown of warrant outcomes where properties were occupied, vacant or where disconnection was not undertaken.

  * indicates deletions of material that is commercial in confidence

3.  OTHER KEY POINTS

  3.1  During the evidence session, there was debate on a number of other issues around: the fitting of gas pre-payment meters, impacts on customers of debt, disconnections in error, judicial responsibilities, average gas and electricity debts, support for vulnerable customers and Fuel Direct, where we thought it might be helpful to provide further data.

3.2  Fitting of gas pre-payment meters

  3.2.1  In 2003, British Gas was able to install a gas prepayment meter on 4.7% of visits where it was necessary to execute a warrant, and install an electricity prepayment meter on 93.8% of visits.

  3.2.2  As evidenced above in the case of electricity, British Gas is very willing to install prepayment meters where it is safe and practical to do so. However, in the case of gas, there are genuine industry wide issues that hamper the fitting of gas prepayment meters where the customer is not present. British Gas is committed to resolving these issues and is working with Transco and Ofgem to find solutions. These issues include:

    —  It is important to carry out a "purge and relight" throughout the property—this is vital on the grounds of customer safety—this activity will take at least 45 minutes to one hour to complete (three times the time it takes to disconnect). Where a gas supply has been interrupted or a meter reconnected, it is necessary to ensure that the air or gas/air mixture is purged out of the pipes and the appliance relit and is burning correctly, for safety reasons.

    —  In order to carry out a "purge and relight" it is critical that the engineer has access to all rooms within the property to check for all gas appliances in order that the necessary safety procedures have been completed.

    —  Where meters are outside of the property, access will be required, forcibly if necessary, to carry out the "purge and relight"

    —  In carrying out the "purge and relight", an unfortunate, yet necessary consequence may lead to the condemning of some or all appliances where safety for the customer is an issue.

    —  It is regrettable that in some instances, the engineer may find themselves in a hostile environment where personal attack is a real risk. Engineer safety remains paramount at all times. The length of time it takes to install a PPM and effectively complete a "purge and relight" within a property increases the opportunity for personal attack.

3.3  Impacts on customers of debt

  3.3.1  British Gas gross debt write-off for 2003 was £62 million, representing just over 1% of turnover. Compared to an average of 2.5% for the water industry.

  3.3.2   Whilst removal of disconnection rights in the case of gas is estimated to reduce costs of the order of * for British Gas, there will be additional costs due to elongated debt paths, increased use of the courts and alternative debt recovery methods, which will largely offset any potential cost reductions.

  3.3.3  The threat of disconnection in our debt correspondence, where all other attempts have failed, is an important factor in securing payment from those customers that otherwise might not have paid or agreed to a payment arrangement.

  3.3.4  Determining the level of debt "at risk" in the event of disconnection procedures being removed, is very difficult to assess; This is due to factors such as the extent to which gas and electricity bills would receive a lesser priority by customers. British Gas is firmly of the opinion that the threat of disconnection encourages many customers to take paying their gas and electricity bills seriously and is genuinely concerned that this will lead to an increased bad debt provision.

  3.3.5  Relevant data is therefore limited on which to base an accurate assessment. However, based on that of our gross bad debt write-off and the experiences of the water industry, British Gas' bad debt provisioning could be in the order of £150-160 million per annum. This approximates an increase on each of our customers bill, of £7-9 per annum.

  3.3.6  Disconnection procedures help to minimise cross subsidisation of costs, which ultimately are borne by all customers including those vulnerable customers who do pay.

3.4  Disconnections "in error"

  3.4.1  British Gas was concerned to hear that energywatch seemed to be suggesting at the hearing that 6% of all customers disconnected were in error with the inference that these customers had already paid their bill. This is not the case and it is our belief that energywatch should have made clearer that the 6% figure quoted in fact related to 6% of the 239 "complaint" cases received by energywatch within the 12 months up to March 2004. In reality, the 6% referred to by energywatch equates to 14 consumers across the whole industry and not 6% of the 12,774 disconnections undertaken for debt during the same period.

  3.4.2  Whilst there are instances of genuine mistakes being made, the majority of disconnections in error tend to be related where it subsequently transpires that there is a mix-up with which meters serves which property, for example, where there is a block of flats with communal meters. This aside, British Gas has introduced additional procedures which are designed to ensure that supplies are traced prior to disconnection. Furthermore, in the unlikely event that a customer is seemingly disconnected in error, British Gas has emergency procedures in place to effect an urgent reconnection, thus limiting any further inconvenience for the customer.

3.5  Judicial Responsibilities

  3.5.1  British Gas noted at the hearing, comments to the effect that the quality of information provided by suppliers on application to the courts of a warrant of entry was potentially lacking. British Gas takes its judicial responsibilities extremely seriously when applying for warrants. In addition to its legal responsibilities to its customers eg notice of court application under Human Rights legislation, under oath it is standard practice to provide the courts with confirmation that:

    —  a valid statutory notice of our intention to disconnect has been sent to the customer;

    —  a valid notification has been sent to the customer of our intention to apply for a warrant;

    —  confirmation of the date of the visit made to the premises and the result of that visit;

    —  confirmation that a PPM will be offered if contact is made, subject to being safe and practical; and

    —  additional information is provided as requested of the courts from time to time. Never is information withheld from the courts or a representation made that is untruthful.

3.6  Average gas and electricity debt

  3.6.1  As per our quarterly returns submitted to Ofgem (Social Obligations Reporting) for 2003, for gas, the average gas debt is £139.19 and for electricity £188.92. These figures include those customers who have entered into arrangements to pay, eg to pay by instalments or via a prepayment meter.

  3.6.2  The average debt value at disconnection for a gas and electricity customers is estimated at between £300 to £400. These figures are greater than the figures identified in 3.6.1 as it includes those customers that have been progressed though our comprehensive debt management process, including the offer of a prepayment meter.

3.7  Support for vulnerable customers

  3.7.1  British Gas would like to emphasise that we treat disconnection as a last resort and offer a wide range of ways for customers to pay off their debt and at least 14 attempts to contact the customer over a 150 day period.

  3.7.2  We have carried out a significant amount of work internally to address issues surrounding the identification and subsequent treatment of vulnerable customers. Working with our charity partners, Help the Aged, Scope, RNIB, Save the Children and others, British Gas has developed a simple definition of vulnerability which will include pensioners, people who are disabled or who have a long-term illness and some families with several young children.

3.8  Fuel Direct

  3.8.1  We believe that Fuel Direct could be better used to help vulnerable customers manage their debt more effectively. This would include widening the range of benefits covered by fuel direct (currently only income support and income based job seekers allowance are covered) to include disability living allowance, attendance allowance, long term incapacity benefit, retirement pension and income support with disability premium.

Annex A

Warrant Outcomes—2003
GasNumber
Warrants, executed and meter disconnected for occupied premises 12,275
Warrants executed and meter disconnected for vacant premises 16,151
Warrants executed, but disconnection did not follow eg customer agreed prepayment meter 19,689
Total48,115
ElectricityNumber
Warrants, executed and meter disconnected for occupied premises 169
Warrants executed and meter disconnected for vacant premises 3,539
Warrants executed, but disconnection did not follow eg prepayment meter fitted 8,754
Total12,462




 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 21 March 2005