Select Committee on Trade and Industry Minutes of Evidence


APPENDIX 5

Supplementary memorandum submitted by Rolls-Royce

1.   How does Rolls-Royce regard South East Asia? Do you rate it highly as a growth area? Can it be treated as a single entity or does each country have different problems and potential?

  Rolls-Royce regards the ASEAN area as an important market with considerable growth potential. We have been present in the area for many years and in recent years have had notable successes details of which are described in full in our memorandum. We are currently active on some large opportunities.

  Whilst the current absolute size of the ASEAN markets lags behind the USA and Europe its predicted growth rates in GDP in percentage terms exceed both. Since most of our markets are GDP driven this represents a very significant opportunity. Although business in the region slowed during the financial crisis our interest in the area was not adversely affected and we have continued to strengthen our competitive position in the period since.

  In our view, South East Asia cannot be treated as a single entity, despite the obvious linkages between its economies. As suppliers of capital goods we have to approach each country individually, bearing in mind the different economics, political and other characteristics of each country and then each customer individually, noting their particular needs, culture and distinctive decision making processes.

INCENTIVES FOR FOREIGN INVESTMENT

2.   What sort of incentives are available to attract foreign direct investment in the countries in which Rolls-Royce is based? For example, are there tax incentives, favourable policies on foreign equity holdings, or assistance with establishment and training costs? How do these vary from country to country in the region?

  The type and level of incentives vary significantly between countries in the region. The increase in Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) to China is recognised by countries and is seen as a result of the sizeable domestic market. As such some ASEAN countries are beginning to understand the need to look at FDI as being a gateway to the Asia markets.

Singapore

  In Singapore there are many incentives for foreign direct investment. These include Pioneer Status for start-up enterprises for up to 10 years (zero tax), equipment grants and training grants. There are also several launch programmes for companies expanding into sectors of core interest to Singapore. These include covering development costs of Singaporeans in the company's home country for up to 18 months with the intent of placing those people in the company's now expanded operations in Singapore. The company, if they decide to take the staff on, then covers 30% of the 18 months cost. There is no obligation to take up the staff after the 18 month period.

Malaysia

  Malaysia offers fairly significant grants and incentives and other fiscal means to attract investment. More recently in certain key industries (mainly high tech) it has permitted 100% foreign ownership. Malaysia also desires to move into high technologies and move up the value chain and create niche centres of excellence.

Thailand

  There are tax breaks and incentives available which vary from region to region.

  Inward investment may be affected by doubts cast over investor protection in cases such as Thai Petrochemical Industries where, post bankruptcy, the government came down on the side of the local company rather than the foreign investors.

Indonesia

  Very little is publicised about the country's incentivisation programme.

3.   Were such incentives instrumental in persuading you to establish yourselves in Singapore and Malaysia, or were your investment decisions driven more by competitive labour costs and other factors? What persuaded Rolls-Royce to establish bases in Singapore and Malaysia?

Singapore

  Rolls-Royce's presence in Singapore dates back to the mid 1950s and our relationship with Singapore Airlines was launched when the airline chose the Trent 800 engine for the Boeing 777 aircraft in 1995.

  The establishment of our Joint Ventures in Singapore was based on a direct business case assessment and the technical capability of our partners. The location of these JVs allow Rolls-Royce to provide world-class repair and overhaul services to Rolls-Royce engine operators in the Asia Pacific region.

  The incentives Rolls-Royce received, such as Pioneer Status, were achieved after the establishment of the JVs and did not tip the balance in the fundamental decision to proceed. Rolls-Royce continues to pursue incentivised expansion of the JVs in Singapore.

Malaysia

  At this stage Rolls-Royce has made no investment in Malaysia choosing to work with local companies to support the product in country.

4.   When the Committee undertook an inquiry into trade with China and Taiwan two years ago, it was told that many UK companies still found it easier to do business in Hong Kong than in Mainland China because of the common tradition of commercial law, the legal certainty provided by the court system and the congenial business culture in Hong Kong. Are these factors relevant to British companies considering establishing themselves in South East Asia?

  Countries where the legal framework was built on the British system facilitate location decisions for UK companies because of familiarity with legal rights. English being widely spoken is also a significant advantage. Additionally, the banking system, basic infrastructure, living conditions and incentives offered make it easier to establish an enterprise in ASEAN.

  In countries, such as Indonesia, more progress on legal reform would be a greater encouragement to enhance investment. Rolls-Royce does not have any investment in Indonesia or significant exposure. This is likely to remain the case for the immediate future.

BUREAUCRACY

5.   What sorts of bureaucratic problems has Rolls-Royce encountered in establishing and maintaining businesses in South East Asia? How do the South East Asian countries compare with each other in the bureaucratic barriers to business that they impose?

Singapore

  The Singapore government has created an extremely unbureaucratic structure as part of their strategy to attract companies to set up business headquarters. This also applies to Employment Pass applications for foreign workers, which is part of a strategy to access the international workforce given the restricted availability of domestic skills.

Malaysia

  The inherent government bureaucracy and slowness in responding does provide barriers to business. Once set up, however, MIDA is helpful and is implementing an improvement process.

Thailand

  Rolls-Royce (Thailand) Ltd was formed in 2001 under Board of Investment approval. This proved to be a very straightforward process and allows Rolls-Royce to provide services and trade in-country.

Indonesia

  Conducting business is complex requiring an in-country presence, in-depth understanding and established relationships. Whilst there are issues compared with other SE Asian countries, Indonesia presents good opportunities and manageable risk.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

6.   Have you experienced any problem in protecting your Intellectual Property Rights in the region?

  Rolls-Royce has experienced no problems to date but protection of IPR and confidentiality of contracts is a major issue for many companies, including Rolls-Royce.

CORRUPTION

7.   Earlier this year, the Economist published an article highlighting problems with corruption in South East Asia, and implying that, despite government efforts to reduce it, this is still a major difficulty for those wishing to do business in these countries. Has Rolls-Royce encountered any problems? If so, are they more acute in some countries than others?

  Rolls-Royce is committed to best practice in its ethical conduct, complies with all relevant legislation and observes fully codes of conduct such as those issued by OECD. As such we are at pains to ensure that appropriate due diligence is carried out when, for example, involving advisors or other third parties in particular sales campaigns or other business transactions.

EXPORT MARKET POTENTIAL

8.   Is South East Asia a mature market for UK goods and services? Are there parts of the region with significant market potential still to be tapped—and, if so, are UK businesses alive to the possibilities?

  Because of their significant economic growth rates even the more developed countries in the region offer attractive business prospects. Customers in these countries demand the most modern technologies, the most demanding value propositions and the most sophisticated after sales services. They also offer opportunities for partnering as their own capabilities and funding abilities continue to develop. In the less developed economies there is equal, though different potential as its populations come to demand more energy, travel and infrastructure. However, they often wish to go beyond simple acquisition and look for technology transfer, offset or other inward investment as part of the packages for successfully winning business. It is important for potential suppliers to these markets to understand and react to these dynamics.

  Specific examples of growth areas include the intra Asian travel with good opportunities for our Airlines business and the growth of deepwater oil finds in Malaysia giving opportunities for our Energy and Commercial Marine business.

  Thailand is well understood and we are well positioned. Myanmar, and to some extent, Cambodia may offer future prospects, depending on political developments.

  Indonesia is a growth market. The UK is the second largest investor after Japan.

9.   Large companies experienced in foreign trade, such as Rolls-Royce, probably do not have to make much use of the services provided by UK Trade and Investment; but as a company with a great deal of knowledge of foreign trade and of this region, how good is the support given to UK businesses by UKTI? What are its strengths and its weaknesses? How does it compare with the sort of support available from other countries' trade promotion bodies to their companies?

  As a large company, with regional representatives, we have a very limited need to call upon UKTI. Where we do, this is usually to provide additional focus to particular events or help facilitate inter-Government contracts. We have, however, found local UKTI representatives extremely responsive and keen to offer support. Their services are probably of much higher value and impact to smaller companies, with little expertise of the region and practices.

  Other departments across Whitehall are also very supportive of UK businesses. A recent example of this is the creation of a small taskforce set up to help support our current campaign in Malaysia. The taskforce was initiated by DTI and the members consist of representatives from DTI, UKTI, ECO and Rolls-Royce. Another source of support is from Embassies and High Commissions whose advice is invaluable.

TRADE AGREEMENTS

10.   Singapore and perhaps other countries in the region would like an EU-ASEAN trade agreement. However, at the moment ASEAN is too loose an association to make this practicable. In the meantime, Singapore and Malaysia are actively pursuing bilateral Free Trade Agreements as an alternative or addition to the WTO negotiations. Would there by any advantages—whether economic or political—to your business from either an inter-regional or bilateral agreement?

Singapore

  A bilateral ETA between Singapore and the EU would be beneficial to our business in that it would level the playing field with our US competition. Singapore already has an ETA with the USA. There may be certain withholding tax advantages to our customers when selecting EU-based equipment, which the US FTA already allows. This is almost certainly the case in the financial, insurance and legal sectors. Being seen to be positively active in this regard (Singapore-EU ETA) is in itself helpful.

Malaysia

  Almost certainly where Rolls-Royce has business across the EU any framework which eases trade has to be welcomed.

Thailand

  EU-ASEAN would help to establish the EU as more of a trading block to off-set the power of the US.

Indonesia

  Yes.

13 October 2004







 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 4 April 2005