Select Committee on Treasury Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 460-479)

JOHN HEALEY MP AND MR PAUL GERRARD

2 FEBRUARY 2005

  Q460 Norman Lamb: Could you investigate and do a note for us?

  Mr Gerrard: I can ask Mr Hewitt for some further information on that and I am happy to see what we can provide on that.

  Q461 Mr Cousins: Just to follow that, how many scanners have you actually got?

  John Healey: For tobacco?

  Q462 Mr Cousins: Yes?

  John Healey: We have got scanners deployed generally. We have a certain amount of mobile equipment but generally we have scanners deployed in 14 of the most significant ports where we see the most regular route for tobacco smuggling.

  Q463 Mr Cousins: So you have got 14, as it were, permanent ones and how many mobile ones?

  Mr Gerrard: I do not know the precise number off the top of my head.

  Q464 Mr Cousins: Could you let us know?

  Mr Gerrard: Yes.[4]

  Q465 Mr Cousins: Do you still operate a car pool on which people draw to drive around the country to make brief appearances at airports and ports?

  Mr Gerrard: We have official vehicles that are obviously used—

  Q466 Mr Cousins: How many cars do you have in the car pool?

  Mr Gerrard: I do not know.

  Q467 Mr Cousins: Perhaps you would let us know.

  Mr Gerrard: I can do, yes.

  Q468 Mr Cousins: One of the suggestions has been that there should be a licensing system which would secure the whole tobacco network. Is that something that you are considering?

  Mr Gerrard: It is something that we have discussed with the tobacco manufacturer that has raised it. I think the point is that the nature of the illicit market and the criminal organisations that Customs and Excise deal with means that they operate outside that licensing regime. Those who want to be in the licensing regime would be in it. These individuals operate outside it. The whole illicit tobacco market is just that; it is illicit from start to finish.

  Q469 Mr Cousins: But the licensing regime would presumably be accompanied by very severe penalties for people operating outside the licensing regime?

  Mr Gerrard: I am not clear how the licensing regime would impact when counterfeit cigarettes are brought into the country if they are brought into the country illicitly and therefore they are outside legitimate controls.

  Q470 Mr Cousins: But the point is that the licensing regime provides a secure route which is the basis of detecting the people who are not operating through those secure routes?

  Mr Gerrard: As I said, the nature of the illicit tobacco market is such that they would operate outside those secure routes. I am not clear, having looked at it, how that would help when dealing with organised criminality who are not part of that licensing regime but would quite easily get product from this.

  Q471 Mr Cousins: Are you operating primarily a regulatory system or a forensic system and one that depends on investigation? Which is your primary approach?

  Mr Gerrard: When tackling the illicit market in cigarettes, which is illicit from start to finish, we engage in a law enforcement effort which involves both detection and intelligence and very sophisticated criminal investigations.

  Q472 Mr Cousins: How many bodies do you have committed to this?

  Mr Gerrard: Over 2,200.

  Q473 Mr Cousins: And how does that compare with 2000-01 when the number of prosecutions was twice as great as it was last year?

  Mr Gerrard: We have 2,200 at the moment with an illicit market at 15% and in 2000 we had 1,200 with an illicit market of 21%.

  John Healey: But as I think we have tried to stress, simply looking at prosecutions is only part of the picture. During the first three years of the tobacco strategy we also disrupted 190 tobacco smuggling gangs, not necessarily showing up in the prosecutions figures but playing a part in reducing the market share of the operations which are feeding the illicit tax-free market in this country.

  Q474 Mr Cousins: Yes but we have been given these figures about disrupting gangs. It is not entirely clear what each of these units of disruption of gangs actually means.

  Mr Gerrard: When we disrupt a gang we put that criminal organisation out of business for a period of time. The length of that period depends on what other action we take in terms of criminal prosecution or, more importantly, when tackling organised criminality getting after the money and seizing the criminal benefits. If you take away the money and get after the money that is what really hurts serious organised criminality.

  Q475 Mr Cousins: You mean outside the measure of prosecutions there is another process going on which is monetary in its approach and completely separate?

  Mr Gerrard: No, it is linked to criminal prosecutions but one criminal prosecution could result in assets being confiscated from a criminal of £2 million. The Proceeds of Crime Act is a vital tool in this because what it does is it allows law enforcement agencies to get after the criminals' benefits.

  Q476 Mr Cousins: Perhaps you would be able to give the Committee some information which would shed some light on this?

  Mr Gerrard: I can give an answer now.

  Q477 Norman Lamb: You do disrupt sometimes without prosecuting and there are concerns, are there not, amongst some people subjected to this who claim they are innocent that this circumvents the proper process of enabling them to defend themselves in court?

  John Healey: It is certainly true that some of our action will be civil action rather than criminal action but it is also the case that where any sort of action like that is taken, Customs have to be able to stand up the evidence in the case that the activity was breaking the tax law. People in those cases have the right to an independent review of the seizures within Customs and they also ultimately have the right to challenge those seizures through the magistrates' courts or through the adjudicator.

  Q478 Norman Lamb: But it is after the event?

  John Healey: Yes it is after the event but there are rights, safeguards and appeal processes in place.

  Q479 Angela Eagle: How much money have you seized under the Proceeds of Crime Act?

  Mr Gerrard: I do not have the figure to hand but I could certainly provide it to you with a note.[5]

  Angela Eagle: I think that would be helpful.


4   See Ev 138 Back

5   See Ev 138 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 15 March 2005