Select Committee on Treasury Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by HSBC

Cash machine charges

  Thank you for your letter dated 9 November 2004 addressed to Mr Geoghegan, Chief Executive Officer, requesting that HSBC Bank plc make a written submission to assist you with your inquiry. I am responding on his behalf as he is away from the office. We aim to provide the Committee with information on HSBC's automated teller machine ("ATM") network and our views on the current state of the market.

HSBC's network

  HSBC is a member of LINK whose network has 53,507 ATMs, of which 20,895 charge a fee for withdrawals. Our customers have access to all LINK ATMs. HSBC alone has 2,957 ATMs, of which 508 are not located in branches. We do not charge for use of our ATMs, nor do we charge our customers when they withdraw from other providers' ATMs.

  These machines provide the following services to customers: cash withdrawals; account balances; Personal Identification Number ("PIN") changes; statement ordering; mini-statement prints; and account transfers between HSBC accounts at the same branch. We have also introduced multi-function machines which combine the features of paying-in machines and ATMs.

The principle of charging

  Providing ATM access to customers is a significant operational cost for banks. HSBC receives an interchange fee for every non-HSBC customer using our machines, but also pays an interchange fee every time one of our customers uses a competitor ATM. Overall, the running cost of HSBC's ATMs plus the cost of our customers using other bank machines mean that the net cost of providing cash through ATMs is very large.

  We provide our customers with free access to the majority of the ATM network. The members of LINK agree an interchange fee to cover average operating costs, as defined by an annual independent study carried out by KPMG. This process was endorsed by the OFT following its investigation into ATMs completed October 2001 which allowed cost recovery through application of an interchange fee. The OFT also permitted the use of surcharging as an alternative to the interchange fee.

  The interchange system is concerned with cost recovery, not profit. Since the interchange fee is based on the average cost of an ATM transaction, the only way an operator can make a profit is by:

    1.  Operating an ATM network more efficiently than the rest of the market so that the interchange fee exceeds the operator's actual cost. This might involve getting more people to use its machines, so achieving economies of scale.

    2.  Surcharging instead of receiving the interchange fee for transactions.

Factors affecting growth

  We consider the UK market for ATMs to be near saturation point with over 53,000 ATMs. There are very few new high volume sites available now and, therefore, new sites tend to be lower volume and more difficult for the provider to cover costs. In addition site owners now view ATMs as a source of income and are increasingly seeking to maximise returns.

  The significant costs of maintaining and renewing ATM networks, particularly in non-branch sites, have led to some financial institutions selling parts of their network. This is not an option that we have pursued.

Transparency

  We provide customers with clear guidance on our machines regarding charging. Our ATMs indicate on screen that they provide free withdrawals and if a credit card withdrawal is being made, the customer is warned that their card issuer may charge them.

  We believe that any ATM surcharges should be clearly indicated and give the customer the opportunity to end the transaction before committing to the withdrawal. With these measures in place, we consider our customers capable of deciding whether to withdraw funds from a charging ATM or use another method to access their funds.

  The LINK rules on notifying surcharging currently state that: "A sign saying `This machine may charge you for LINK cash withdrawals' must be clearly visible to cardholders before a card is inserted in a surcharging ATM (either by notice on the machine or an up-front on-screen message, at the discretion of the ATM deployer)". However, we consider that some surchargers do not make the fact that they charge sufficiently clear to customers as the stickers indicating that machines charge are not always prominent and a warning screen is not necessarily shown at the start of the transaction. We would therefore welcome any action by LINK to improve clarity.

Codes of conduct

  The revised Banking Code covers the issue of cash machine charges and HSBC already complies with its terms. Not all cash machines providers subscribe to the Banking Code. All LINK members have to comply with the LINK rules which are based on the Banking Code. We believe that compliance with the Banking Code and the LINK rules is sufficient regulation to ensure that transactions are conducted fairly and in a transparent way.

Problems of access in remote locations

  In the main, surcharging machines are situated in low volume locations where a provider cannot recover the running costs through the interchange fee. These sites tend to be convenience stores, pubs and stations and are not sites that are financially viable as there would be insufficient income from the interchange fee to cover costs.

  HSBC is committed to providing banking services to all sections of the community where it is viable to do so.

  I trust that you will find HSBC's views helpful.

6 December 2004





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 31 March 2005