Select Committee on Treasury Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 60-79)

MR JOHN HARDY AND MR HOWARD AIKEN

21 DECEMBER 2004

  Q60 Chairman: What if somebody came to you and said "In Speke the operators are charging £10 for each withdrawal"?

  Mr Hardy: I do not think they are charging £10.

  Q61 Chairman: No, but what if they said that to you? What would go through your mind?

  Mr Hardy: There is no evidence that I can see that—

  Q62 Chairman: I am just asking you that question. At £10, what would go through your mind?

  Mr Hardy: I think that is obviously a very high amount.

  Q63 Chairman: That is it?

  Mr Hardy: Yes.

  Mr Aiken: The point is that under competition law, we are not allowed to determine the amount of the surcharge. We are forbidden by law.

  Q64 Mr Beard: What amount do the charging companies pay to you when they use your facility?

  Mr Hardy: To facilitate the transaction?

  Q65 Mr Beard: Yes.

  Mr Hardy: We have a thing called the switching fee, which is paid to us, and on average it is less than a penny.

  Mr Aiken: But the point is, that is paid by the bank that issues the card. That is not paid by the independent deployer.

  Q66 Mr Beard: So the people who charge pay you less than a penny?

  Mr Hardy: No, they do not pay us anything. The card issuer pays us less than a penny.

  Q67 Mr Beard: But the banks, the free machines, pay you 31p?

  Mr Hardy: No, it is the same fee. There are two fees to look at, in a sense. There is the interchange fee, which is paid by the card issuer to the ATM owner, and that is the 19p or 31p. The card issuer pays LINK something less than a penny on average to facilitate that transaction.

  Q68 Chairman: What is the relationship between LINK and the banks and building societies and charging companies, and how independent of your members are you?

  Mr Hardy: There are essentially two parts to LINK. There is the commercial company, if you like, which sits in the middle and which facilitates the technology and the finances, and then there is the bit which Howard runs, which is the card scheme, which is essentially a member-owned organisation. It is an association, if you like, governed by a vast body called the Network Members' Council, which I think at the moment has 53 members on it, and which debates the terms of trade, if you like, the rules applying between them.

  Q69 Chairman: Your website notes that you have "vast experience and detailed understanding with regard to the establishment and growth of shared ATM networks by balancing the needs of consumers, acquirer banks and card issuers."

  Mr Hardy: Yes.

  Q70 Chairman: How do you take account of the needs of consumers in your policy development?

  Mr Hardy: We seek to encourage openness and transparency from all of the members, and we have strict rules about transparency and about notification.

  Q71 Chairman: Do you have any consumer representatives on your board?

  Mr Hardy: No, we do not. We do talk to them.

  Q72 Chairman: Do you invite consumer groups to your members' meetings when you are discussing relevant issues such as providing clear warning of charges?

  Mr Hardy: We have never done that, but we have spoken to the consumer groups on numerous occasions.

  Q73 Chairman: It would not be a bad idea, would it, if you further engaged with consumers?

  Mr Hardy: I have no objection at all to it.

  Q74 Chairman: No objection indicates that you have no objection, but you are not going to do anything about it.

  Mr Hardy: It does not mean that at all.

  Q75 Chairman: So what do you mean?

  Mr Hardy: I mean I am quite happy for them to come along if they want to come along. Essentially the Network Members' Council is a member-owned organisation and if the members are happy to have consumer affairs people coming along, that is fine by me.

  Q76 Chairman: So if a consumer phoned up and asked when the next members' meeting was and invited himself along, you would have no problem with that?

  Mr Hardy: I think inviting themselves along is different.

  Q77 Mr Plaskitt: Who writes the rules of the LINK organisation?

  Mr Aiken: Essentially it is the members, the members write the rules, but our rules have been, and were, submitted to the Office of Fair Trading back in 2000. They spent 14 months looking at those and gave us an individual exemption in respect of interchange fees, but what we do in terms of interchange fees and all our other rules is very closely regulated by the Office of Fair Trading under competition law.

  Q78 Mr Plaskitt: So it is the members of LINK who write the rules of the organisation?

  Mr Aiken: Yes.

  Q79 Mr Plaskitt: When decisions are made within the organisation about those rules or any changes to those rules, how does that actually happen?

  Mr Aiken: That happens by means of a vote and, depending what the issue is, there are various majorities that have to be achieved.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 31 March 2005