Select Committee on Treasury Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 320-339)

MR BENNY HIGGINS AND MR JAMES CROSBY

1 FEBRUARY 2005

  Q320 Chairman: The ordinary person in the street would think if you sold people something you would get the money back and your submission says to us that you got that money and you invested it, but in fact you lent it. How does it square up?

  Mr Crosby: First of all, the proceeds are free and unencumbered and are generally used for investing in the future of that business. As it happens, the major thing we did in that business last year was the largest recruitment exercise in retail financial services in 2004, it was 2,000 people which we felt we  needed to strengthen our customer service. Secondly, we have lent an increased facility to the company, not uniquely related to this transaction, against all its operations and ultimately on terms that have been agreed on an arm's length basis, so that money will be repaid to us, that is a commercial loan.

  Q321 Chairman: It would be useful if you could write to us on that to explain it.

  Mr Crosby: I am very happy to do so.[1]


  Q322 Chairman: At the time of the Cruickshank report in 2000 a branch based withdrawal at the counter cost over three times as much as an ATM withdrawal. Are these figures still accurate for both your banks?

  Mr Higgins: We do not allocate costs in that manner. Clearly that order of magnitude would be about right.

  Mr Crosby: It is about right.

  Q323 Chairman: Mr Higgins, how separate is the management of governing policy for RBS's own free ATM network from that of the Hanco network?

  Mr Higgins: It is quite independent, but it does report to me as it falls within my area of responsibility. I should stress that our reason for buying Hanco was that it was an emerging channel, as this inquiry has set out very clearly, and as such it was important for us to be represented. More importantly, in terms of increasing customer choice, it is the retailers who are typically our small business customers and who are providing that service, so it was very important to us.

  Q324 Chairman: In terms of the governing policy, it is integrated with RBS, is it?

  Mr Higgins: Yes. We are growing our free estate and we intend to continue to do so. The only places where we have taken machines out have been where we have failed to reach an agreement, which are the 14 machines referred to earlier. Hanco is growing a quite different estate. A typical ATM which is free to use has 7,000 withdrawals a month and it can go up  as high as 30,000. The typical number of withdrawals in a Hanco machine is less than 300. These are quite separate markets.

  Q325 Chairman: In terms of the strategy of RBS, there will be empathy between Hanco and the RBS approach for ATMs, will there not?

  Mr Higgins: The same values in terms of running a business, but they are quite separate in terms of the strategy.

  Q326 Chairman: Could you give us a note on that?

  Mr Higgins: Absolutely.[2]


  Q327 Mr Cousins: Do you have any special arrangements, either Halifax with Cardpoint or RBS with Hanco, about the revenue derived from charging?

  Mr Crosby: No, I do not think so, not in terms of my understanding of your question.

  Q328 Mr Cousins: I thought my question was perfectly clear.

  Mr Crosby: We have sold the machines and we do not get any revenue from them.

  Q329 Mr Cousins: And you have no special arrangements with Cardpoint about sharing a revenue?

  Mr Crosby: No.

  Q330 Mr Cousins: So it is a straightforward case, you have lent them the money, and they pay the money back?

  Mr Crosby: Yes.

  Q331 Mr Cousins: What about your relations with Hanco, do you have any special internal arrangements about the charging income?

  Mr Higgins: It is very clear in our case, Hanco is wholly owned by The Royal Bank. The pricing that is set for a particular machine in a particular location is set by the retailer independent of the amount that Hanco receives. Hanco receives roughly a third of the typical fee of £1.50, but in a case where the charge was higher what Hanco would receive would still be the same, and Hanco is wholly owned by The Royal Bank, so that is the income less the costs in delivering that service.

  Q332 Mr Cousins: The arrangements that exist between people providing customers with cards and the cash machine operators are fairly clearly set down. For remote machines there might be a financial incentive to having a charged for system because you would save the fees that you would otherwise have to pay the cash machine operator for a free machine.

  Mr Higgins: That is true. However, let us put our credentials on the table. The Royal Bank of Scotland has never charged customers or non-customers for the use of ATMs. When we acquired NatWest in March 2000 we very quickly abolished a decision to charge customers. We have never done so and we have no plans to do so notwithstanding that the economic dynamics of ATMs would be more favourable if there were charges.

  Q333 Mr Cousins: You would agree that there is a general financial cost saving for you in the expansion of the charged for network.

  Mr Higgins: It has no impact on the situation as far as we are concerned. We have a situation at the moment where running our 6,000 free to use ATMs comes at some considerable cost. The machines which Hanco are putting in place are quite separate and in quite different locations, locations that would not be served under any reasonable circumstances by a machine that was free. The cost of these machines is of quite a different order.

  Q334 Mr Cousins: The point I am making to you is that if one of your customers uses a charged for machine you do not pay a fee to the cash machine operator.

  Mr Higgins: That is right. It is equally true that if a customer of another bank was to use one of them instead of using one of ours we would forego the interchange that we would have received. Interchanges flow in both directions if you are an issuer and an acquirer. [3]


  Q335 Mr Cousins: What is your attitude to this?

  Mr Crosby: I think I see the point you are making. The fact of the matter is, however, that the fee free ATMs in the UK have also grown. Over the last four or five years they have grown from 27,000 to 33,000 and with a much higher volume, so there is continued growth in that area and the predominant transactions continue to be there. I do not think one can argue against that background that the addition of fee charging is necessarily a saving for the banks, it is an addition of choice if you view it from the perspective of saying there is no interchange fee.

  Q336 Mr Cousins: And the fee system is different in the case of machines that are owned by the banks from machines that are free standing in remote locations. The fee you save as the charged for network grows is at its greatest for remotely placed machines. That is correct, is it not? So you have a financial incentive to see the growth of machines in remote locations that are charged for.

  Mr Crosby: I think it is a marginal difference and it is small in relation to the fees that are being charged to make these remote locations sustainable in the eyes of either the retailer or the provider who owns them.

  Q337 Mr Cousins: When the competition authorities were looking at these arrangements that were being made between banks and cash machine operators they allowed a higher fee to be paid for freestanding machines because of the extra costs involved and there was a clear steer that that was intended to encourage cash machine operators to reduce those costs gradually, but in fact what you both have chosen to do in slightly different ways is to see the expansion of the charged for network saving you the fees. Is that not quite what the competition authorities intended when they allowed this system to be created?

  Mr Higgins: Can I just state some facts about what has happened? In 2004, throughout our 6,000 free to use ATMs, both branch and non branch, we had 576 million transactions compared with 538 million transactions in 2003. There was also an increase in the number of ATMs we had available. So the free to use ATM estate of The Royal Bank of Scotland Group is growing both in terms of number and in usage.

  Q338 Mr Cousins: What about the growth of the Bank of Scotland's free machine network off bank sites, is that growing?

  Mr Higgins: The Royal Bank of Scotland's network?

  Q339 Mr Cousins: Yes.

  Mr Higgins: Both our branch and non branch networks are growing at a fairly healthy rate.


1   Ev 175 Back

2   Ev 173 Back

3   Note from the Witness: Even where there is a surcharge the card issuer still has to pay interchange to the ATM owner for balance enquiries and rejected transactions. This is substantial (the current rate in LiNK for balance enquiries is 18.2p or nearly two-thirds the rate fir cash withdrawals). There is no real incentive for banks to encourage conversion of sites to charging. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 31 March 2005