Select Committee on Treasury Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 540-559)

MR PETER MCNAMARA, MR ASHLEY DEAN, MR RON DELNEVO AND MR MARK MILLS

1 FEBRUARY 2005

  Q540 Chairman: No, I have never seen "may". Quite frankly, I have not. Therefore, will you go for a maximum or a minimum so that it tells people what they are going to be charged? As I mentioned earlier, having to go to 4 corners of a room if we had these machines there to find out exactly what is the cheapest, that is not really transparent. Mr McNamara, you have the reasonable voice and face here, tell us?

  Mr McNamara: You are broadly right. I would agree with you that you can put a range in place, but, it is quite true, there are some cards that operate free even on surcharging machines.

  Mr Delnevo: Mr McFall, you keep making the point about people going round four ATMs. You have never acknowledged the point that Mark Mills has made that the vast majority of people using these machines use them week in week out. The signage is a minor issue because they are aware they are going to pay for it and they go back knowing it is convenient to them. That is the beginning and the end of it.

  Q541 Chairman: We are interested in the public policy viewpoint, and if people approach your machines and come away with big smiles, then I am delighted. The happier the world is the better.

  Mr Delnevo: But they are working, so they do smile.

  Q542 Chairman: Mr Dean, your submission noted that having the amount of the surcharge on the screen and displayed on marketing materials, such as window stickers, would be problematic. As you say in your submission, "Any changes to price would require expensive site visits and signage upgrades"?

  Mr Dean: Yes.

  Q543 Chairman: Could you tell us how much a large sticker costs?

  Mr Dean: The large sticker probably does not cost very much, but the visit of a skilled trained engineer to go and attach it does. They go when the machine breaks down. The serious point behind this unenthusiasm for putting prices all round everything, is that the effect that that will have will sort of fix the price, and whatever it is, it will tend to stay that way. We talked about some of the competition between independent companies. What if I want to put one near one of Mark's HBOS arrangements at £1.00, let us say? Surely that would be a good thing for competition, and that is absolutely the way this company thinks.

  Q544 Chairman: Let me try and go on and ask that. How much would a site visit cost? Since you may either visit the site on a regular basis to replenish the cash.

  Mr Dean: I do not do that.

  Q545 Chairman: Or if a replacement is provided by the retailer you could send them the sticker or sign in the post, so it does not seem to add up to much, Mr Dean?

  Mr Dean: No, but then remember we are looking at  this in the context of LINK carrying out enforcements, so it is not good enough, I do not think, to send it in the post, is it? What if they do not attach it? Retailers get piles of post saying "Attach this that and the other".

  Q546 Chairman: Yes, but I think an important message would be, here is the sticker, here is the sign. They do it with petrol stations. If they have price changes they are able to do that, and you get regular visits. It actually comes over as disingenuous.

  Mr Dean: It is absolutely not meant to be that at all. In fact, I am a little disappointed you see it that way, because I think we have been very enthusiastic about supporting the charging. All I am trying to maintain is a position where we can alter prices quite quickly. I just thought as a basic principle in any market being able to alter prices quickly is a good thing.

  Q547 Chairman: Then again, the idea of expensive visits and signage, I do not think that is an impediment to letting people know exactly what they should be paying or roughly what they should be paying?

  Mr Delnevo: This is a low margin business, Mr McFall. It is not a high margin business. That is what you are missing here. Every time you put the cost up, you put the cost up to the consumer as well because that has to be passed on.

  Q548 Chairman: You are going out to visit these machines to replenish them. Mr McNamara, can you try and explain for me what your colleagues are on about here?

  Mr McNamara: The concern, of course, and it is a genuine concern, is something that the labelling requirements are consistently carried out by the retailer or the site owner. To that extent we make sure the engineers check that signage is in place for advice. There is no way of avoiding that requirement. The ability to suddenly put in place new signs clearly does incur a cost, because hopefully our machines do not need—

  Q549 Chairman: You see, it could be perceived that the answer that is given here is that the less information the better for yourselves, the less information to the consumer.

  Mr McNamara: I would stress, and I think it is worth stressing because people can get too far carried away with this, this is one of the most transparent charges that there is, and clearly it will be, with the increased signage, a very visible charge in terms of what you incur in banking. Other charges associated with a card transaction are completely non-transparent.

  Chairman: There you are.

  Angela Eagle: We have been talking to them about that.

  Chairman: I think posting a sticker is not too expensive a measure, Mr Dean.

  Q550 Angela Eagle: Do you expect that if you put these signs on and transparency will increase by July that your usage will go down?

  Mr McNamara: No.

  Q551 Chairman: Could I move on to the suggestion we had from Which?, which asked if there could be some of sort of standardised labelling such as a large triangle for a charging machine and a large circle containing the word "free" for the free machines. Would you consider implementing this suggestion in order to make it easier for informed choice?

  Mr McNamara: I think it is not necessarily the best answer. I think very clearly everybody understands that broadly speaking building society and bank machines so branded are nearly always free. Any machine that is not so branded, clearly there is a warning on it of some type of charge that may be levied. Where it could be limiting, and I would stress it could be limiting, is that certain cards that do operate are free, even on charging machines, as has been alluded to, and there is every potential that in future deals and transactions that enable cards to operate free at our machines will come about. There is no reason, for example, that the banks or other card issuers have to pass on the surcharge. That surcharge travels in a quite separate field technically speaking, and the amount of that surcharge that is passed on to the customer is entirely discretionary to the card issuer.

  Q552 Chairman: The concept of labelling machines free of charging; is that not a reasonable idea?

  Mr McNamara: Yes.

  Q553 Chairman: It is something we could work on?

  Mr McNamara: Yes.

  Mr Mills: We made our machines bright orange from the beginning to differentiate ourselves from the bank and then have asked every single customer to accept the charges. To put a red cross or a green tick on, I do not know whether it would add anything, but we are happy with the principle, but by the same token you have to look at the—

  Q554 Chairman: Are you happy with the principle, Mr Dean?

  Mr Dean: Yes, of course, and voted for it.

  Q555 Chairman: Mr Delnevo, are you happy with the principle?

  Mr Delnevo: The principle of having improved signage we are always happy to look at. The fact is that no ATM is truly free in this country, so it is very dangerous to suggest you could put "free" on any ATM.

  Q556 Chairman: So you are against putting "free" or "non-charging" on?

  Mr Delnevo: I am against putting free on any ATM because you get charged for credit card transactions at ATMs and there are a host of other things that you get charged for. It is not as simple as free or not free, unfortunately.

  Q557 Chairman: That is fine. That is a very clear answer. Voluntary regulation is only effective if  there are effective monitoring enforcement procedures in place. Can you guarantee that all your cash machines are complying with the existing Code of Practice?

  Mr McNamara: We checked them regularly with our engineers to make sure that they do comply, and it is our intention to carry on doing that.

  Q558 Chairman: They do comply?

  Mr McNamara: As far as we are aware, they all comply.

  Mr Mills: We check them regularly, but, unfortunately, if someone were to peel one of the stickers off then you are left in a fairly invidious position; so to mitigate that we are putting it on the screen. They all comply, as our engineers leave the premises, and they will all comply when it is on the screens.

  Mr Dean: Yes, subject to them being checked whenever we arrive.

  Mr Delnevo: The same answer.

  Q559 Chairman: If the rules were changed to enable convenience cash machine operators to join, would your companies be willing formally to sign up to the relevant provisions of the Banking Code and be subject to the procedures of monitoring and enforcement?

  Mr Mills: Given that that would give us less stringent regulation—


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 31 March 2005