Select Committee on Treasury Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 740-746)

SIR MIKE HODGKINSON, MR DAVE MILLER AND MR GRAHAM HALLIDAY CBE

10 FEBRUARY 2005

  Q740 Chairman: The research indicates that, in terms of cash withdrawals, it is people with lower incomes largely who make the cash withdrawals. These cash withdrawals at Post Offices in my area indicate that there is a clear pattern that shows the more deprived an area is, the greater the number of cash withdrawals. There is a big financial exclusion agenda for you to tackle there, not just in my area but overall. Would you agree with that?

  Mr Halliday: We acknowledge that and we think the best way we can tackle it is to ensure that all customers can actually access the cash that they want over our counters, and that is our aim.

  Angela Eagle: There is one thing that ties in with what the Chairman has said about the Post Offices in his own area where very large numbers of people using ATMs in Post Offices are charged when they could actually get their cash free by going to the counter. This pattern is reproduced in other places, including Speke. Spending £6 million on telling them that they can get their cash free is perhaps not the biggest advertising campaign we have ever seen. There must be some lack of information here. You can assume that some people are in a rush and so they pay the fee, but that does not account for the very high percentage of people who are actually subjecting themselves to a fee in Post Offices to get cash when they can get it free. You cannot be communicating with them properly.

  Q741 Chairman: When that happens to four out of ten, there is a problem.

  Mr Halliday: First of all, can we check the four out of 10 figures just to understand that?

  Q742 Angela Eagle: I have some other figures here from Speke that say the same thing is happening there.

  Sir Mike Hodgkinson: It is in our core interest to try to get as many people to use free cash over the counter because we are trying to encourage that use through the network.

  Q743 Chairman: As my colleague says, you need to man the tills and not have queues of 15 or 20 minutes. That is the issue. There is just one last point about the figure of £10 million. We are really interested to know where that is going because you are not making money and the sub-postmasters are not making money. Goodness knows who is making the money. I think an answer is required on that mystery £10 million. As a large network, you have a unique opportunity to provide free cash machines and improve financial inclusion. In fact, that is the reason why you were invited here this morning. You invited yourselves because you sent us your submissions, which we were happy to receive. We support the efforts of the Post Office to improve over-the-counter services. We will write to the banks and others to see what the barriers are to further progress to try and assist in that.

  Sir Mike Hodgkinson: That would be extremely helpful.

  Q744 Chairman: It appeared to us this morning, Sir Mike, that you are not meeting your responsibilities at the moment and that increasing charging is contrary to the objectives of financial inclusion. There does not seem to be any measurement of financial exclusion when deciding whether to install free or charging machines. I think we need some more information from you on that. Restricting competition to three suppliers is resulting in more charging machines, not less. The sub-postmasters indicate to us that they need more freedom about whether to install a free or charging machine in their branch. It was very clear from the letter to the sub-postmaster in Garmouth that there was no choice there; a charging cash machine was installed, and there was no choice. That seems contrary to the principles of the market that you are espousing. Given that all the banks are installing free machines in their branches, and they are doing that because it is quicker and more efficient for the consumer, the Post Offices seems to be the only financial institution going in the other direction, and that causes us concern. We will be focusing on these issues in our report and, hopefully, the submissions you make to us will help answer some of these questions.

  Sir Mike Hodgkinson: May I say one thing in conclusion? We would be delighted to take up the potential offer this morning from Nationwide to put in a significant number of more free machines in our network. We are already in discussions.

  Q745 Chairman: Do not let us kid the public, Sir Mike. You will have agreements with Alliance & Leicester and whoever else and they will be coming to you afterwards and saying, "Wait a minute".

  Sir Mike Hodgkinson: But these things always take time.

  Q746 Chairman: It is more complicated than you are indicating at the moment, although your intention is good. We wish you well with that intention.

  Sir Mike Hodgkinson: That is what we are pursuing.

  Chairman: Thank you very much.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 31 March 2005