Select Committee on Treasury Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 320-339)

MR JOHN VARLEY, SIR FRED GOODWIN, MR SHANE FLYNN AND MR MICHAEL GEOGHEGAN

26 OCTOBER 2004

  Q320 Angela Eagle: It is your sales methods for them that worry me rather than the fact that they are Affinity cards.

  Mr Flynn: I do not know about the particular case that you are referring to but it is certainly one of the ways that we market our Affinity cards.

  Q321 Angela Eagle: Do you think this is reasonable when somebody is out and they have a pile of shopping and one of your sales people stops them on the way out of the supermarket, asks them to look at a credit card or debit card to prove their identity and wishes them to sign up for one of your cards straight away before they leave, does not give them leaflets to take away with them but has the hard sell on the way out of the door?

  Mr Flynn: Again, without knowing exactly what happened but from the description you give me, I hope that sales person was professional in the way they handled themselves. If they are being very blunt to a prospective customer and if they are anything other than professional, I would not support that, nor would anyone at MBNA support it.

  Q322 Angela Eagle: Do you outsource your sales?

  Mr Flynn: We do in some cases, not in every case but in some cases, yes.

  Q323 Angela Eagle: Some of it is direct employees?

  Mr Flynn: Some of it is done by MBNA people and some of it is done by agents that work for us.

  Q324 Angela Eagle: Do you not think that if somebody asks to take away a leaflet they ought to be given a leaflet to take away rather than pressured to sign up. In this particular case they were told they could not take a leaflet and that the sales person was the "walking, talking leaflet" and they should sign up immediately.

  Mr Flynn: Depending on what we mean by "leaflet", they absolutely should supply the prospective customer with terms and conditions, if that is what the customer has asked for. We may not have leaflets available so depending on what it is that is being sold to them, there may not be a leaflet, that is not to say there may not be what is described in our industry as a "take one" so they could look at a picture.

  Q325 Angela Eagle: This is an Affinity credit card with people asking you to sign up to it on the spot after they have checked your debit card?

  Mr Flynn: Checked your debit card?

  Q326 Angela Eagle: Yes, for your identity, literally on the way out of the shop.

  Mr Flynn: If one of our agents engages from MBNA, they need to respond to the customer, be professional and, if the customer requests information, asks for terms and conditions, they need to supply it. We have had at least one situation where that did not happen with one of the members of the Committee.

  Q327 Angela Eagle: I suggest it is rather more widespread than you are admitting?

  Mr Flynn: I do not know of others.

  Q328 Chairman: You did have a fundamental reappraisal after a seller refused to give me an application form when I was outside Old Trafford?

  Mr Flynn: Yes we did.

  Q329 Angela Eagle: It does not seem to have made much difference?

  Mr Flynn: If we could talk about the particular incident, where it happened, when it happened, I could follow up on it, but I do not know where this incident took place. I do know about the one at Old Trafford.

  Q330 Chairman: Mr Varley, I think it is time you spoke up for yourself. On the illustrative scenarios aspect, you and Lloyds TSB have put these on your literature and your marketing material sent to me yesterday. As a Committee we have been saying it is important that people know the minimum repayment type. It seems to me this is a good standard for the whole industry to adopt, what you have here because on a purchase of £1,000—you have given this illustrative example in your marketing material—it says here for a minimum repayment each month it would take 20 years and four months, but for a payment of £50 each month, it would take two years and one month and for £100 each month, it would take 12 months. I think those are the things that consumers are looking for. Why did you do that? Did consumer research show you that was the right thing to do? Is this a lead for the rest of the industry?

  Mr Varley: Chairman, it is good you like what we are doing here. I said earlier in answer to Ms Eagle's point that our research with customers suggests that if you put simple scenarios in summary boxes in the way that we have done, and you express them in the way they think about managing their money affairs, then that resonates with them and they find it is helpful. For me, the illustration brings the health warning alive. It is one thing to say, "beware of making minimum repayments" which is a rather arid comment. It is quite another to say now, look at the arithmetic and the duration consequences of operating on minimum payment as opposed to £50 a month or as opposed to £100 a month. The response we have had from those customers who we have talked to about this has been very positive.

  Q331 Chairman: I think I would like to get to the bottom of it because on the one hand we have been told by some people "the industry confuses me". Sir Fred's letter to us said that you have drawn the conclusion that they are more likely to confuse rather than help, and I know the DTI have expressed doubts also but as a Committee, we have been kicking and pushing the DTI and they have still got to the view of the Consumer Credit Act from the mid 1970s. I would not hold the DTI up as a benchmark here for movement in the industry, you need a lot of improvement in that. As well as that MBNA, Mr Flynn, you said in your statement that it would not be helpful to have these scenarios. If people are told that it is going to take 20 years to pay off, I think that is the best way for them to say, "Oh, I had better get my finances in order" rather than just a statement about minimum repayment, and I looked at your statement, Sir Fred, and it seems the absolute minimum there. I think the average consumer would just glance over that but, as portrayed in the Barclaycard, HBOS and Lloyds, examples it tells people exactly what the situation is. It would be good if we could get industry movement on this.

  Sir Fred Goodwin: I think the flip side of that is it could quite easily create the impression with the consumer that they have got 20 years to repay the balance. I would not suggest that anyone has got 20 years to repay. They should think about repaying the minimum balance as it says here.

  Q332 Chairman: Minimum payment, if you pay £50 it comes down, if you pay £100. I think the ordinary rational consumer would understand if I put a few bob extra in here every month, then the debt would not be around my neck for so long.

  Sir Fred Goodwin: I think all of our customers would pretty readily understand that. I do not think there is anyone making a minimum repayment that does not understand that. The warning notice that goes on the accounts, I think, is crystal clear. Only making minimum repayments is not something you should think of doing. I think the notice is clear. Nobody is arguing about highlighting this feature to customers at all. It is important that they understand it. We have something on the face of every statement which I guess is when most people come to think about what repayment they are going to make, and it is explained further on the reverse of the statement. Nobody is arguing about the basic principle. I think to many people a scenario is a lesson because the minute they see tables of figures and explanations it becomes less attractive to them to read.

  Q333 Chairman: If I look at your statement here, I have got it in front of me, it is in relatively small print—I will put my glasses on for it—"only ever making the minimum repayment will significantly increase the time taken to clear your balance and cost you more", and "if you are unable to pay the minimum payment, please contact us as soon as possible". I think there is a world of difference between that and what Barclaycard and the rest of them have.

  Sir Fred Goodwin: They certainly look different. The objective here is to draw customers' attention to the facts, and customers' attention has been drawn to the facts. I think showing someone a model that says "If you repay this, it will take you 20 years" it somehow creates the impression of 18 years or 20 years, you have got that and you can seriously say . . .

  Q334 Chairman: I do not accept that Sir Fred, I think that is a bit of slick salesmanship to be honest with you. You have got it here, alongside your money transfer service. What I would ask you to do is go back and look at these issues for the sake of the customer and the sake of the consumer because it is a hallmark what Lloyds TSB and HBOS have put on and I would like to let the rest of the industry to be as upfront and honest with consumers on this issue. Mr Flynn, you do not like it either, can you give us some movement on it?

  Mr Flynn: I take the point you are making but in the last year under the auspices of APACS we did meet and spent some time looking at scenarios. While I accept the point you make about DTI, when we looked at this, we could not see it would work. My personal feeling is that if you give the statement on the minimum payment for the following month and the estimate on interest, those two combined give people a good feel for what they would pay.

  Q335 Chairman: When you say it would not work, it is obvious from Barclaycard it does work and for others. Would you commit yourself to discuss within the industry with Barclaycard and others to see if we can get this on the face of every monthly statement?

  Mr Flynn: Well, I will take it away and examine it.

  Q336 Chairman: Would you take it away Sir Fred?

  Sir Fred Goodwin: Absolutely. I would not want you to think we have not discussed it already.

  Q337 Chairman: Mr Geoghegan?

  Mr Geoghegan: Yes we are prepared to look at it.

  Q338 Mr Beard: On the annual percentage rate, the Committee found there were two methods of calculating it, when we looked at this last year. Since then, one of the points of progress has been an agreement in the industry to a basic way of commonly calculating this. Can we take it you are all happy with the guidance you have had from the OFT and the DTI and you are all ready to produce this agreed calculation APR by the end of next week?

  Mr Flynn: Yes.

  Mr Varley: Yes.

  Sir Fred Goodwin: Yes.

  Mr Geoghegan: Yes.

  Q339 Mr Beard: What do you believe is the implication of the APR to the average consumer? Is the implication that if you have got a higher APR, you are going to be paying more for the services you give, if you have got a lower APR, you are going to be paying less, is that a fair assumption if you are an average consumer?

  Sir Fred Goodwin: I think it is a reasonable assumption but there is an element of the calculation which it does not cover.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 4 February 2005