Select Committee on Treasury Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 540-551)

MR JOHN VARLEY, SIR FRED GOODWIN, MR SHANE FLYNN AND MR MICHAEL GEOGHEGAN

26 OCTOBER 2004

  Q540 Norman Lamb: Do the others of you have a similar principle about not trying to increase the limits of people who are in full time education?

  Mr Varley: Our approach would be that we want to see a pattern of card usage before we increase the limit. If somebody is running the card, borrowing on it, operating that borrowing and repayment successfully, we would consider maybe once or twice a year whether there should be a limit increase. If there is a pattern of minimum payments, for example, if it is clear that the card holder is struggling with the borrowing, we certainly would not increase the limit.

  Sir Fred Goodwin: We would have a maximum of two increases a year, but it is based on an assessment of the person's creditworthiness.

  Q541 Norman Lamb: There is quite a lot of concern about lending to young people, the huge pressures that they are under and the tragic cases that have come out and so forth. Do you feel as a group that there is some way to go, that you could do more to try and improve the standards of responsible lending, particularly to that rather vulnerable group where the pressures are so great to spend and spend?

  Sir Fred Goodwin: The bulk of credit that goes to students does not come from us. It comes from the government.

  Q542 Norman Lamb: You want a bit more sharing of information?

  Mr Varley: The information would be helpful.

  Q543 Norman Lamb: The debt that is building up on the student loan?

  Mr Varley: Yes.

  Q544 Chairman: We asked this question last week as well. In the US consumers are allowed to request a copy of their credit report once a year free of charge. Do any of you see any merit in introducing a similar measure in the United Kingdom, allowing customers to check their credit report for errors and provide them with details of their total debts?

  Mr Flynn: It is my understanding that in the US it is for those people who have been declined, the free one, but I would support that.

  Q545 Chairman: It is the Federal Trade Commission which has issued its final rule regarding free annual credit reports under the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act.

  Mr Flynn: I would support it in general.

  Sir Fred Goodwin: As you know, customers can have access to their record but it is not from us. It is from the reference agencies.

  Q546 Chairman: Do you think it is a good practice to introduce here?

  Sir Fred Goodwin: The practice is here.

  Q547 Chairman: It is not free. It is £2. That is the difference.

  Mr Varley: I have nothing to add to what Sir Fred said.

  Q548 Chairman: What did Sir Fred say?

  Mr Varley: What he said—I have perfect recall of it—was that customers can get access to the history held by the credit reference agencies.

  Q549 Chairman: For £2. It is not free. Do you think we should have it free here?

  Mr Varley: If I was going to answer the question accurately, I would want to know—and I do not know, I am afraid—how many customers apply for it. If there is a huge volume of demand for it, I can see there may be an advantage in having it free. If it is rather a specialist subject for a small number of customers, the cost of provision will be quite high.

  Mr Geoghegan: I share the same view as Mr Varley.

  Q550 Chairman: I spent quite a part of my life in Northern Ireland and some colleagues are still over there. They mentioned to me about the situation in Northern Ireland about the big banks, the four main players, yours, Ulster Bank, which you own, the Bank of Ireland, First Trust Northern Bank. I believe yours is the largest in terms of current account business in Ulster Bank. Ulster Bank charges an account maintenance fee of £8 a quarter, as does Bank of Ireland and First Trust Northern Bank is £7.50. It was pointed out to me this is rather strange concerning Ulster Bank because no other member of the Royal Bank of Scotland Group charges a quarterly overdraft fee and, even though the vast majority of banks will charge interest when you become overdrawn, almost all banks of England, Scotland and Wales have long abandoned fees and charges on authorised overdrafts. Are my friends in Northern Ireland getting a pretty bad deal and can they get a better deal?

  Sir Fred Goodwin: You have perhaps half answered your own question in the sense that these fees are obviously visible to people in that market place. That is the most important point. I am not here today equipped to answer detailed questions about Ulster Bank but Ulster Bank is thriving in Northern Ireland and in the Republic of Ireland. In my experience, businesses only thrive when they offer opportunities to customers that are attractive and competitive. You have highlighted that it is a highly competitive market place. There are other parts of the Royal Bank of Scotland Group where fees are charged that are not charged here—for example, in the United States and in Europe. All it serves to highlight is that in different markets there are different charging structures. The most important principle and the one that has lain at the heart of the discussions we have here, one that we fully subscribe to, is around transparency. In a free market, the important point is that customers are given transparency of information which enables them to make choices. I would start from a position of believing that to be the case in Northern Ireland. I am happy to look at it and come back to you.

  Q551 Chairman: There is a difference between the United States and Northern Ireland. I do not want to offend my different friends in the many different political spectrums in Northern Ireland. Also, on transaction charges, there are charges when you write a cheque, for a direct debit payment or draw money from an ATM. If you bank with Ulster Bank, the breakdown of these charges is as follows: manual debit, 58p; automatic debit, 43p; switch debit, 44p; cheques and standing orders, 58p. Again, neither Nat West nor RBS charge their customers for making the above sorts of transactions. It seems a bit of a raw deal.

  Sir Fred Goodwin: I am not armed with the information. I will get the chief executive of Ulster Bank to draw up a response to that. [3]

  Chairman: Thank you. Can I thank all of you for your attendance this morning? It has been extremely helpful for us because we have a common agenda here and we wish to see that pursued to its satisfactory conclusion. We hope as a Committee to issue a short report on this and to continue this discussion with yourselves but on the issues this morning we have agreed that we are all moving forward on a summary box and monthly statements. All of you are thinking of possibly looking further at using the style used by Barclaycard for minimum repayment scenarios. On interest calculation methods, we all agree that the present system is far from ideal. There is still quite a lot of work to do on that. I believe all of you are looking to supplying written information to the Committee on the types of cost which fall on banks giving rise to penalty charges. On data sharing, progress has been made with the APACS agreement but again there is much more to be done there. I believe that you will look at issuing credit card cheques on an opt in basis only (but with no expectation of movement). However, we will leave you to look at that. I think it has been very constructive for all of us on the Committee and hopefully for yourselves. You know that we are going to be conducting a financial inclusion inquiry and we just have a few tail end questions on that. I would like you to take back our thanks to APACS, in particular, to Sandra Quinn and others, because we have become constant friends over the past 18 months or so and they have progressed things a lot for us on that. Mr Flynn, you can give my regards to Charles Krulak. He came and entertained us with his hearts and minds scenarios. He sent us a nice letter as he departed for the United States. Mr Varley, you can give your thanks as well to your predecessor. We have a fond and deep appreciation of him. We look forward to continuing our relationship with you. Thank you very much for your attendance this morning.





3   Ev 81 Back


 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 4 February 2005