Select Committee on Treasury Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Mr Roger Bootle, Capital Economics

  1.  While the November Inflation Report was unsurprisingly pretty dovish in tone, it stopped just short of confirming that interest rates have now reached their peak.

2.  As the Chart (on the next page) shows, on the basis of current market expectations of a flat profile for interest rates, CPI inflation is expected to rise to meet its 2% target over the next two years. But it is then expected to rise a bit above its target in the third year of the forecast, suggesting that, while the Committee sees no urgency to hike again, it perhaps feels that another increase might eventually be necessary to keep inflation on target in the medium-term.

3.  With regard to the inflation outlook, I broadly concur with the Bank's profile, although I think, not for the first time, it is overdoing the inflation dangers. I suspect too that the intense competitive pressures in the high street will mean that CPI inflation does not rise quite as high as the MPC predicts over the next two years, despite the recent build-up of costs pressures further down the pipeline.

4.  With regard to interest rates, I am not sure whether they have peaked but if they have not then the peak is very close. Moreover, it seems to me that the forces for lower rates next year are gathering strength. In particular, if house prices continue to slide, while inflation remains low, then the Bank will surely switch to be concerned to prevent a period of serious weakness in the housing market, possibly accompanied by weak consumer spending as well. I expect rates to fall to 4.5% by end 2005 and to 4% in 2006.

5.  But if this view becomes widely established it makes it more likely that the housing market could rebound, thereby complicating the Bank's task still further. Accordingly, it should not be surprising that the Bank does not want to encourage this message.

6.  It was very striking that the Bank stated that it now expected house prices to fall modestly next year. While this appears relatively anodyne it was a marked departure from previous statements and was potentiality highly significant. I suspect that the Bank wants to do what it can to make sure that the market does not rebound—particularly if rates are not going to rise again, and may even fall before too long. If you like, it is trying to use talk as an alternative to action. And so far, the signs are that this tactic is working.

7.  The Bank made a strong call in arguing that the relationship between the housing market and household spending has broken down and accordingly, that a period of falling house prices would not lead to pronounced weakness in consumer spending. As it happens, I think that the Bank is right about this. However, I have argued that house prices will fall by 20%, and perhaps by much more. This is clearly more than the Bank's "modest falls". Accordingly, the effect on consumer spending and on the economy would be larger. Moreover, there is a risk that the relationship between the housing market and consumer spending which appears to have broken down in the years of surging house prices reasserts itself in the years of falling house prices. In that event, the Bank's forecasts for GDP growth and inflation would prove to be too high and the forces pushing for lower interest interest rates would be correspondingly stronger.


17 November 2004





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 14 January 2005