Select Committee on Treasury Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Rolls-Royce plc

REGIONAL PRODUCTIVITY: UK COMPETITIVENESS

1.  ROLLS-ROYCE IS A GLOBAL COMPANY

    (i)  Rolls-Royce is the UK's leading engineering company and sole aero-engine manufacturer. The Company also has strong positions in propulsion-related sectors. It is No 2 in the world aero-engine market competing against GE and UTC—a position that has strengthened substantially since privatisation in 1987.

    (ii)  The Company's contribution to the UK is significant. R&D intensity and new capital investment are high. We own and control critical intellectual property; have access to a range of global markets; and, provide a route to market for around 300 first tier suppliers in the UK. The competitiveness of the UK is important to maintaining our global position.

2.  ABILITY OF UK LOCATIONS TO COMPETE INTERNATIONALLY

    (i)  Some 60% of our employees and 45% of our suppliers are based in the UK—and 59% of Rolls-Royce's turnover is UK based. However, around 60% of our total turnover is in US$, with only 25% in £ sterling.

    (ii)  A number of factors determine the international competitiveness of our UK operations. These include the quality and productivity of the UK supply base; availability of a skilled and flexible workforce; the quality of industrial relations, a stable economic climate; a supportive tax regime, effective central and regional government support mechanisms; and, our ability to generate and retain IPR within the UK.

3.  INVESTMENT

    (i)  Our productivity has improved systematically over the last decade or more—with value added per employee growing at well beyond the UK manufacturing industry average. This is supported by a high level of new product investment, new capital facilities and modernised working practices.

    (ii)  Rolls-Royce has shown strong commitment to the UK—in the last two years we have announced £230 million of investment in our UK facilities and in the last five years we have invested over £3 billion in R&D, which includes investment in technology as well as new product development.

    (iii)  However, the Company's technology acquisition activities (R&T) have moved increasingly overseas. In 1987, at privatisation, 98% of the R&T investment was undertaken in the UK, compared with some 35% today.

4.  VALUE OF HIGH R&D INTENSITY INDUSTRIES

    (i)  We believe that high R&D intensity companies like Rolls-Royce give rise to substantial economic spill-over benefits within the wider economy. Social returns to R&D can far exceed the private returns to investing companies—an important market failure in the context of Government policy making.

    (ii)  There is evidence that high R&D (as a % GDP) economies are high productivity economies. Supply chain relationships in the development and manufacture of new products may be a key channel through which these large economic benefits are realised—with prime producers such as RR providing access to international markets and driving the adoption of new technologies and processes.

5.  THE ENVIRONMENT FOR INVESTMENT

    (i)  Government policy has recently highlighted the importance of science and innovation and its role in contributing to economic prosperity. Following the Lisbon Agenda, a UK target has been established to reverse the decline in UK R&D—the Government's objective is for R&D to reach 2.5% of GDP over the next ten years.

    (ii)  At the same time, HMG is increasingly devolving responsibilities to the regions. The ability of regional government to respond to the challenge of delivering national technology and other economic strategies is a major challenge. The essential role for central government must be to provide direction and co-ordination to enable these goals to be realised in practice. Industry requires a stable and predictable support environment as a backdrop for long run investment decisions.

November 2004





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 11 April 2005