Select Committee on Welsh Affairs Written Evidence


13.  Written evidence from Dr A H Stamp

PUBLIC SERVICES OMBUDSMAN (WALES) BILL [HL]

  1.  Ombudsman.  Satisfactory.

  2. & 3.  Powers of Investigation.  Satisfactory.

  4.  Complainants.  Satisfactory.

  5. & 6.  Requirements to complain. Satisfactory, but suggest Ombudsman could extend one year duration if appropriate.

  7.  Matters to be investigated.  Satisfactory.

  8.-11.  exclusions.  Satisfactory.

  12.  Decision not to investigate. Sub-section 3, for "may" substitute

    (What provision is there for disagreement with Ombudsman's decision not to investigate? See "Later Comment").

  13.  Investigation procedure Sub-section 4b Any person can be represented by counsel if the person so wishes.

  14. & 15.  Information; Obstruction Very satisfactory in providing the Ombudsman with real power.

  16.  Reports of investigation 5 for "May" substitute "must".

  17.  Publishing reports. (1) (4) At least four weeks not three. Otherwise satisfactory.

  18.  Publishing, health care. Sub sections (2) (6) four weeks not three. Otherwise satisfactory.

  19.  Action after report. Very satisfactory.

  20.  Reports, alternative procedure. Sub section (6) substitute "must" for "may".

    (What is the procedure for objection to Ombudsman's decision ? See "Later Comment".)

  21.-22.  Special reports.  Satisfactory.

  23.  Special reports.  See "Later Comment".

  24.  Consultation and Co-operation  Satisfactory.

  25.  Disclosure of information.  Does this consider Freedom of Information Act 2005?

  26.  Disclosure prejudicial etc   Satisfactory.

  27.-29.  Listed authorities. Satisfactory.

  30.  Power to issue guidance. Satisfactory

  31.  Defamation.  Satisfactory.

  32.  Publicity for complaints.  Satisfactory.

  33.  Compensation  Satisfactory.

  34.-45.  Page 31 Section 14 lb Substitute "must prepare any other report . . .".

LATER COMMENT

  With regard to the establishment of the Ombudsman, there does not seem to be sufficient emphasis or clarity on the role of the Ombudsman in relation to the Assembly.

  1.  If the Ombudsman is to investigate complaints against the Assembly, then he must be fully independent of the Assembly, and his judgment accepted by the Assembly.

  2.  What occurs if the Assembly does not resolve to approve the Ombudsman's recommendations. Section 23. Does this involve further proceedings in a Court of Law ?

  3.  Again, if there is a complaint against the Ombudsman, who decides the procedure and verdict.

  4.  Also, is there any appeal by either party from the judgment of the Ombudsman? If so, to whom?

  Page 31 Section 14 16 is noted.

29 December 2004





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 21 February 2005