Select Committee on Welsh Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 1 - 19)

TUESDAY 16 SEPTEMBER 2003

WELSH ECONOMY RESEARCH UNIT

  Q1  Chairman: Welcome, Mr Jones, to the Welsh Affairs Committee.

  Mr Jones: Thank you.

  Q2  Chairman: Sorry to hear that your partner is not able to be here.

  Mr Jones: No, she is stuck on the A48 behind a nasty accident. She has been passed by two police cars and an ambulance. She will come in if she is able to get here.

  Q3  Chairman: At least you are here. Thank you very much. If we can start off with a general question. What do you think is the state of health of the manufacturing industry in Wales and does that reflect just the situation in Wales or is it UK-wide?

  Mr Jones: One would not characterise the situation as good. There are probably two separate factors, if you like. Firstly, we have got long-term decline in manufacturing employment which we have seen over several decades evident in all OECD countries by and large starting from maybe the mid-1970s. Secondly, more recently we have seen specific shocks to the Welsh manufacturing economy from these foreign set of characters; some are sectoral, some are more general. For example, the sectoral would include things like Corus' de-investment in various parts of Wales, the Asian shock, which affected a number of sectors, obviously those more allied to inward investment where we saw some inward investment drop because of the Asian crisis and the ongoing high level of sterling for much of the last five years certainly did not help the exporting parts of Welsh manufacturing. Additional to the long-term decline we have seen several, if you like, one-off shocks which have nevertheless been quite significant in affecting prospects in manufacturing and employment in manufacturing.

  Q4  Mr Williams: Talking about the regional aspect of manufacturing in Wales, the Development Board for all Wales when it was in existence actually managed to stimulate manufacturing within an area where there was no tradition of manufacturing and for a period of time mid-Wales actually showed a growth in manufacturing, manufacturing jobs. What do you see as the prospects for manufacturing in the rural areas in the future?

  Mr Jones: I think there are two linked problems for, if you like, more remote areas as far as manufacturing is concerned. Where we have seen resistance to the trend of declining output and employment has tended to be, by and large, in areas which have good access to markets, good transport infrastructure and so on. Mid-Wales and rural Wales more generally will face difficulties because of the access problems that they face in comparison with other areas of Wales. For example, let us think of along the M4 corridor where land is scarce in very good locations, obviously places like heads of the Valleys and beyond tend to benefit from that, but when you get de-investment the reverse happens and as the better sites become available again very close to the very high quality infrastructure they tend to be the last to go and the first to come back. That will be the problem for rural areas, keeping hold of what they have got. I think we have seen KTM as one big example where there have been these problems. I do not think rural Wales has suffered worse than some of the Valleys which have similar access problems, I think they have that in common.

  Q5  Albert Owen: You mentioned the M4 and as a northern MP I would like to discuss the A55 as well. Do you think there has been an impact on manufacturing since the A55 has been completed?

  Mr Jones: Anecdotally and in recent conversation, certainly with Wrexham County Borough officers, they seem to think their experience of the last few years is far more closely allied to the UK experience in that they have managed to hold up in manufacturing far better than the rest of Wales. That is just anecdotal and I do not know how far the figures reflect that. Certainly along the A55 I would characterise that in exactly the same way as the M4 and the access to the North-West markets, but that is because north-east Wales is by and large part of the north-west England manufacturing cluster, if I can use such a word, and that has been a buffer against lower demand in Wales. Yes, certainly I would use exactly the same characterisation for the north-east part of Wales.

  Q6  Mr Caton: You very kindly produced a briefing paper for us which we were discussing just before you came in and I think we have all found it very useful. In that you set out that during the period 1982-92 inward investment to Wales was proportionally high in comparison to the rest of the United Kingdom. However, since 1997 there has been a sharp fall. Can you elaborate on the reasons why we were successful in that decade and also tell us a little bit more about the reasons for the decline since then?

  Mr Jones: Taking the first part first, there are many reasons that I can only skim the surface of. Wales' workforce is good at adapting to new realities. What we found was that despite the fact we had lots of heavy industry, traditional employment, the Welsh workforce, particularly new entrants, found it relatively easy to adjust to the new demands of inward investment in terms of flexible working practices and so on and so forth, single union agreements. Instances of industrial action were very rare in Wales in this period, certainly in the latter half of that period, compared to other parts of the UK. There was the workforce element of it. The other half related to the WDA, the fact that Wales had its own executive agency which was marketing Wales on a location competitiveness-type basis to Asia and other parts of the World, America, which meant that we had a head start in many ways over other parts, particularly England. Scotland had a similar level of success, not as much success, but Scotland and the SDA, Scottish Enterprise, had a similar benefit compared to English regions. There were those two factors, investment in workforce and the early acceptance by the WDA that inward investment was the way to go and a concentration on that by the agency. Also, of course, Wales has relatively good access to markets compared to some of the other peripheral English regions, such as the North-East perhaps which suffered in the same way but was much further from markets than even we were. I think those sorts of factors played a part in our success. In terms of the decline, I refer you back to my first answer in terms of the Asian crisis certainly and from 1997 onwards attracting new investment and following through on things like LG, LG Electronics and LG Semiconductor, which were problematic at that time because of the Asian crisis, but perhaps more importantly for the future the sharp decline in general activity in cross-border capital expenditures over that period. From 1997 onwards globally we have seen a sharp downturn in FDI flows and obviously, as part of that, flows into Wales and into the UK have declined. I would say that Wales probably has not been any worse than anywhere else, maybe a little better than other parts of the UK, as that investment has tailed off, largely perhaps because we have got major manufacturers here who are to some degree embedded and some reinvestment has occurred at some larger plants which has offset that decline in greenfield investment. What we have seen is many more mergers and acquisitions and reinvestment in existing plants which has taken the place of traditional greenfield FDI. In fact, Wales has a large stock that has offset slightly this fall in the flow of new investment.

  Q7  Albert Owen: Reading through the paper, and you have just elaborated on the period 1982-92 as being the good years and 1997 onwards, because of the Asian crisis, et cetera, but what about the intervening years, 1992-97? Was there steady growth during that period?

  Mr Jones: A levelling off. Without seeing the figures in front of me it would be difficult to say but probably best characterised as a levelling off rather than the same sort of growth that we saw throughout the 1980s.

  Q8  Albert Owen: It did not hit the buffers in 1997?

  Mr Jones: No. From 1992 onwards we probably saw FDI flows in general decline but, as I say, I can provide the Committee with information on that more rigorously afterwards.

  Q9  Julie Morgan: On page six of your report you note that the decline in manufacturing in Wales has been mitigated in part by the growth in private services and non-market sectors of the Welsh economy.

  Mr Jones: Yes.

  Q10  Julie Morgan: Could you expand on what types of employment you are referring to and could you explain the reasons for the shift?

  Mr Jones: The reasons for the shift, again I refer back to my first answer about the long-term shift away from manufacturing in most OECD countries, so we have this increasingly uncompetitive production facility in developed countries compared to where the new centres of production are. In East Asia and increasingly in South Asia you see manufacturing which is much more competitive. The FDI tends to go to those sorts of areas and, therefore, what you get is a kind of hollowing out of manufacturing in developed countries. That is happening in Wales the same as everywhere else, obviously, as services become both proportionally more important and the actuality of employment increases in service sectors. What we have seen in Wales, certainly in the late 1990s, is relatively fast growth in things like financial and business services and transport, communications-type infrastructure jobs. There are a couple of caveats to that, the first one being this is from a very low base and Wales still is not particularly specialised, certainly in financial and business services. One would also worry about the functional base in some of those services. We have seen increases in employment but they tend to be characterised certainly not by indigenous business growth so much as call centre-type employment for the most part certainly in parts of the service sectors, which is often difficult to characterise. If one thinks of SWALEC, for example, or a company like that which is nominally a utilities company, a lot of that employment should probably be in services because it is call centre-type employment. It is difficult to trace these changes sometimes through the official figures. We have seen, again through cost competitiveness and the Welsh workforce, through the delights of the Welsh accent, increases in things like call centre employment at the same time as manufacturing employment has decreased. In very recent years, following increased government expenditure on public services, we have seen a fairly significant increase in public sector employment in Wales. I think the figures from 2001-02 to the year following show something like 40,000 jobs increased in what we characterise as public sector employment. So, in addition to that private service employment, we have got very many more jobs in education, health and public administration driven by increased resources available and through Objective 1 type funding as well.

  Q11  Julie Morgan: With call centres, do you think there is a danger that they will now start moving out of the UK? I say that because in my constituency, Cardiff North, Tesco have said that they are moving their call centre UK-wide activities to Bangalore.

  Mr Jones: Yes.

  Q12  Julie Morgan: This has caused quite a lot of upset in the area. Do you think this is a pattern that we are going to see with call centres that are in Wales?

  Mr Jones: It is a pattern we are already seeing. The new 118 services are an ideal example of that where the majority of those are overseas. We did a very quick piece of work on this recently and you pay a call centre operator in India 10 times less than you do in Wales, the cost difference is of that order of magnitude. On the other side, there may be a customer backlash against this, it is a bit early to say. Certainly there is disgruntlement, not only amongst your constituents but more generally.

  Q13  Julie Morgan: I am trying to resist this move with Tesco's but I am told it is the global economy.

  Mr Jones: Yes, and those cost pressures are very pressing. Even if one were to successfully stave off competition from other geographic locations, looking ahead into the medium and longer term one would worry about the sustainability of these jobs anyway. Certainly with the developments in the Internet and with computerised customer interfacing technology, I think in 20 years these jobs by and large, certainly at the lower end of the functional scale, the very simple sort of jobs, simply may not exist in developed economies as computerised and Internet type customer interfacing takes over. Those two issues, the geographic competition and technology developments, mean that the call centre basket is probably not the best one to put all your eggs in.

  Q14  Julie Morgan: Then to go on to the next page in your report where you cite WDA's research study which lists eight manufacturing industries that scored strongly on the WDA's criteria for strong development prospects. Do you agree with the WDA's assessment and, if so, why?

  Mr Jones: We undertook the work for the WDA so we think that it was a good piece of research, obviously.

  Q15  Julie Morgan: You agree with it.

  Mr Jones: Yes. But there are a number of caveats to that piece of work. Firstly, it was a pilot study, the methodology was new, innovative and quite sophisticated and we would want to do it again with a far wider range of respondents to get a much better feel of the industries. Secondly, the growth sectors that we analysed were to some degree self-selected by the WDA and ourselves with reference to statistical information. So we looked at the high GVA sector, high gross value added sectors, but the WDA, with the best will in the world, wanted us to look at things like biotechnology, optronics and so on, which are designated growth areas into the long-term certainly. There was an element of self-selection there. That is not to say that Wales is moving in and of its own accord into these sorts of sectors, but rather the WDA, with advice, has identified these as potential growth areas for the future. In some of these sectors, even if they take off, even if biotechnology takes off in Wales—the Gene Park is a fantastic success—we are still not looking at employment in the tens of thousands, or even in the thousands, these are specialised jobs and they are not the answer for the vast majority of the Welsh workforce. They may be very high value added and they may add greatly to Wales' industrial mix, but we are not talking about big employing sectors by and large. There are those sorts of issues to think of. They are not good for business start-ups. Most of the sectors we looked at require very high levels of capital expenditure to be involved in things like optronics, electronics, automotive, which we looked at as well. These things are not part of an SME-type strategy, small business start-up, so we mention that caveat as well. Also, there are issues which are difficult to pick up using the data that we have. For example, if one looks at, say, Panasonic in Cardiff, which has lost employment considerably in the last two to three years, on the face of it that looks like a bad news story but when you look at the fact that they have shifted from making analogue TVs and videos to digital camcorders, which require less people but are a more appropriate futuristic product, if you like, it is maybe not such a bad news story. Some of these issues you have to be careful of. Even when you look at a very specific sector, something like TVs and radios, within it includes some growth elements and some declining elements. Finally, I would say that what we did find was even in these growth sectors, these nominal growth sectors, many of the characteristics of the old Welsh economy were still there, so they tended to be dependent on non-Welsh companies either for contracts or part of a supply chain, a logistics chain, which had its executive power outside the principality, there were problems with things like access to high level skills, which characterised the old traditional Welsh economy also. Even in the growth sectors we found several areas of weakness which were common to many of those sectors.

  Q16  Julie Morgan: So there is not a major shift in the type of manufacturing industry in Wales?

  Mr Jones: No, the large employers in manufacturing are still things like automotive, aerospace and steel, even though there are not too many left, supplying sectors, and down the value chains for those sorts of industries. We are not seeing a rebirth of sunrise industries in Wales, what we are seeing is the WDA attempting to identify potential sunrise industries in the hope of being able to help those develop and grow.

  Q17  Albert Owen: What do you consider most important in the current climate, attracting new inward investment or protecting the existing investment that is in Wales?

  Mr Jones: I am probably going to have to hedge this one and say both. I draw your attention to the fact that there is less FDI out there, certainly new FDI, and there is more and more mergers and acquisitions-type activity, so that will give us difficulties in attracting new investment. I would probably say that in terms of keeping what we have the difficulties are even worse. As we saw with Corus, to give you the obvious example, when a company faces serious cost pressures which it thinks are due in part to the geographical location of its business, it is next to impossible for a regional government to stop that company disinvesting in that region. At no point did Corus seriously entertain the notion that they would not close the rolling plant at Llanwern. When you look at the sort of money that these companies do lose week on week and the level of resources that regional governments have, or regional bodies, the two are of a completely different order and the economic reality is that keeping your existing investments will always depend on the economic bottom line. There are things you can do at the margin and I know that obviously we have been very successful at keeping Ford through many rounds of cost cutting in Ford Europe, and I think the attitude of the regional government has helped there, but really it is predicated on a bottom line which is sustainable. Not a good news story either.

  Q18  Albert Owen: You gave an example of shifting from analogue to camcorders, is that more important do you think?

  Mr Jones: Yes, moving up the value chain you could characterise that as. It is trying to make sure any opportunity there is for the relatively high skilled nature of the Welsh workforce to be utilised to make high value products, not having a graduate in a call centre but rather having the available skills employed fully. I think that is a problem in Wales. Because we have this narrow functional base, many companies only do one sort of thing here, and that is production. It can be difficult to get a full range of skills employed in Welsh business and that is a problem that can be addressed perhaps trying to help companies move up the value chain so that high value commodities mean that you can produce longer in relatively high cost locations.

  Q19  Albert Owen: Let me just finish on this. You mentioned the call centres and the drift to places like India. We were talking to the CBI yesterday and they said about our employment laws being slacker than, say, Germany whereas although the costs are more in places like Germany we are losing that base. Do you think we should be looking at stemming that drift away?

  Mr Jones: I am not sure of the CBI's point. Were they were saying that we were losing out to Germany?


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 24 February 2005