Select Committee on Welsh Affairs Second Report


3 Foreign Direct Investment

Wales' Performance in Foreign Direct Investment

28. A significant factor in the survival of manufacturing in Wales had been its ability to attract Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) from overseas.[58] The Welsh Assembly Government noted despite a tough global economic climate the UK remained Europe's top inward investment location, and that Wales' share of those FDI projects - together with the levels of jobs and investment - had increased.[59] In particular, the Welsh Assembly Government highlighted the part that Foreign Direct Investment had played in the diversification of the traditional manufacturing base in Wales.[60] When we visited the United States we held meetings with a number of US companies which had invested in Wales. Those meetings were highly informative on the reasons why those companies had chosen Wales, and what was necessary to both maintain that investment and to attract new investment.[61]

29. The Welsh Assembly Government explained that more than 14% of total jobs coming to the UK in 2002-2003 came to Wales compared with 12.6% in the previous financial year.[62] Wales attracted 7,779 new or safeguarded jobs compared with 7,317 jobs during the previous period - representing an increase of 6% against an overall decline of 6% in the comparable figure for the UK as a whole. In terms of safeguarded jobs —which represent re-investment by overseas companies—Wales captured 18.6% of the UK total and climbed to first place in the regional rankings.[63] The CBI stated that one of the most telling indicators of FDI was that in spite of the recent decline in the ability of the UK to attract foreign investment and that Wales continued to performing well against the UK average.[64]

30. The tables below set out recent levels of Foreign Direct Investment and the impact that it has had on employment:Foreign Direct Investment: 2001 - 2002
Type Projects
Capital Exp (£m)
New Jobs Safeguarded Jobs Total Jobs
Wales 93495.782 5,4694,248 9,717
UK 764N/a 34,03723,801 57,888

Source: WDA and Invest-UK.Foreign investors in Wales

Number of Companies Percentage
USA 17033.1%
Germany 6813.3%
Japan 5911.5%
France 5510.7%
Ireland 244.7%
Italy 152.9%
Sweden 122.3%
Netherlands 122.3%
Canada 112.1%
Switzerland 112.1%
Denmark 101.9%
Belgium 101.9%
Australia 81.6%
Norway 71.4%
Korea 61.2%
Taiwan 51.0%
Hong Kong 40.8%
South Africa 40.8%
Spain 40.8%
Singapore 30.6%
Finland 30.6%
Malaysia 20.4%
Austria 20.4%
China 10.2%
India 10.2%
Jamaica 10.2%
Liberia 10.2%
New Zealand 10.2%
Turkey 10.2%
Portugal 10.2%
Greece 10.2%
Total 513100.0%

(Source: WDA 2002)

The Reasons for Investing in Wales

31. The Welsh Development Agency is the principal agency in Wales tasked with attracting Foreign Direct Investment. It was established in 1977 with a remit is to assist firms and investors, assess their needs and to demonstrate "what Wales has to offer and how that can be made to work for them".[65] The WDA employs specialists from across all manufacturing sectors to work with investors before, during and after they establish their operations in Wales. The Welsh Assembly Government explained that the WDA was also part of "Team Wales" - which included the National Assembly, Local Government education bodies and the private sector - which worked to tailor packages of support which would include grant applications, land and property development training and supply chain sourcing.[66]

32. We asked our witnesses for the main factors that led to their decision to invest in Wales. Ford Motor Company told us that that Regional Selective Assistance Grants[67] their existing investment and the availability of a tried and tested workforce were significant factors in Ford's decision to reinvest in its Bridgend Plant.[68] Matsushita (Panasonic) explained that in economic terms its investment policy was determined by transport and infrastructure, the availability of a skilled workforce the support of the local community and the cost base of that region.[69] While many other regions may have had similar conditions both companies cited the work of the Welsh Development Agency as a significant factor in their decisions to locate and invest in Wales.[70] Anecdotal evidence from our discussions in Wales also highlighted the role of the Welsh Development Agency alongside the proximity to European Markets and cost effective land and labour, as the main drivers for their decisions to establish in Wales.[71]

33. Jacqui Smith MP, Minister of State at the DTI, explained that her Department monitored closely both the number of projects and the number of jobs created by Foreign Direct Investment, across the United Kingdom. She confirmed that in headline figures, Wales was successful and was "punching above its weight". In particular the Minister highlighted the fact that 13% of the jobs created by FDI were in Wales, and averred that it was the highest of any part of the United Kingdom.[72] However it was not apparent that any analysis had been carried out on the qualitative nature of those jobs across Wales.[73]

34. Andrew Davies AM, the Welsh Assembly Government Minister also argued that Wales was "punching above its weight in terms of attracting FDI at a UK level".[74] He stated that although Wales had only 5% of the UK population, it was consistently attracting 7% or 8% of overseas investment. However he acknowledged that FDI had to be balanced with a greater emphasis on indigenous business to encourage more people to set up their companies. Direct support was also necessary for Welsh companies and the Assembly Government Minister gave the example of the establishment of a National Assembly investment grant targeted at the SME sector as a good indication of progress in that area.[75] He explained that roughly 1,000 of these grants had been offered and "virtually all of those are to home-grown businesses".[76]

Quality of FDI

35. There was a consensus amongst our witnesses that Wales had fared well in attracting Foreign Direct Investment (FDI). However, despite that success, several concerns were raised about that FDI. Professor Gripaios argued that although Wales was successful in securing FDI from the United States and Japan-which had the effect of mitigating job losses in existing industries-the quality of those jobs did not necessarily exceed the quality of those that were lost.[77] Furthermore, he highlighted the fact that while the production side of the industry relocated to Wales, higher level functions such as R&D, marketing, auditing and banking "always seemed to be carried out elsewhere in the UK or in some other country".[78] He argued that "Wales tends to have got the call centre rather than, for example, the head or regional office".[79] In statistical terms, he stated that while Wales attracted 18% of the total FDI which came to the United Kingdom, it only attracted 3% of the services FDI which came into the country.[80]

36. The Swansea Institute agreed that FDI had been successful as a generator of employment but noted that the manufacturing processes that were located in Wales were at the mature end of their life cycles. Dr John Ball, of the Swansea Institute, argued that "all the technical development, marketing and financing is complete. Therefore, the skill level is basic and consequently pay is commensurate with limited skill".[81] He further asserted that while FDI remained important to Wales, if it was used solely as an employment generator then Wales would "never see self sustaining growth".[82] Instead, he argued that Wales needed to concentrate on FDI that attracted "businesses that have a future, that drive the economy, that are innovative and different and dynamic".[83]

Headquarters functions

37. The obvious success that Wales has had in attracting FDI has to be tempered by the knowledge that while the production function of foreign investors has been located in Wales, the R&D and Headquarters function have not followed. While CBI Wales welcomed the long running existence of large foreign employers in Wales it aired its concern that the great majority of those employers in Wales "are not headquartered here".[84]

38. TUC Wales also noted this fact. It argued that "it is relatively easy to persuade a company to set up a fairly simple operation; it is much more difficult to get them to set up an advance operation which is involving the research development higher managerial functions".[85] Furthermore, TUC Wales believed that the argument that if the manufacturing arm came that the other functions would follow had now been discredited. However, TUC Wales acknowledged that there was not a large pool of suitably qualified people within Wales to undertake those tasks.[86]

39. In spite of this general view we were made aware of some excellent examples of Wales attracting those higher level functions. When we took evidence from General Dynamics, a defence contractor, it explained that the decision to locate its headquarters in Wales was based on a desire to be close to the primary customer for the Bowman Programme - the Defence Procurement Agency in Bristol. General Dynamics considered all places within a one hour radius of Bristol and chose Oakdale in Wales based on the assistance from the WDA and the quality of life that Wales would offer its employees.[87] General Dynamics argued that having made the decision to locate to Wales it was determined to "ingrain ourselves into the community".[88] Under similar circumstances, Professor Wahab explained that DELTA Microelectronics Ltd also chose to locate headquarter functions in Wales because it considered that "positioning themselves in Wales would be an advantage rather than a disadvantage. They see it as a good entrance into the UK market".[89]

40. The attraction of Foreign Direct Investment to Wales remains an important part of Wales' economic policy, but the quality of that investment should not be overshadowed by the quantity of investment. We recommend that the Department of Trade and Industry, where appropriate, supports fully the Welsh Assembly Government's policies to attract high value added FDI and its accompanying higher level functions to Wales.


58   Ev2 Back

59   Ev301 Back

60   Ev289 Back

61   See Annex. Back

62   Ev300 Back

63   Ev300 Back

64   Ev99 Back

65   Ev300 Back

66   Ev300 Back

67   We discuss RAS grants in paras 78 to 86 Back

68   Qq86-90 Back

69   Ev33 Back

70   Qq91-96 Back

71   Visit to the United States of America, October 2003, see Annex . Back

72   Q909 Back

73   Q910 Back

74   Q850 Back

75   Q850 Back

76   Q850 Back

77   Ev76 Back

78   Ev76 Back

79   Ev76 Back

80   Q225 Back

81   Ev148 Back

82   Q446 Back

83   Q446 Back

84   Ev99 Back

85   Q506 Back

86   Q506 Back

87   Q551 Back

88   Q572 Back

89   Q715 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 24 February 2005