Select Committee on Welsh Affairs Second Report


5 UK Government Economic Policy for Manufacturing

Introduction

51. Since devolution, responsibility for economic policy has been shared between the UK Government and the Welsh Assembly Government. In evidence to us Jacqui Smith MP, Minister of State at the Department of Trade and Industry, explained that the UK Government's primary responsibility for Wales was to ensure the macro-economic stability that would provide a thriving environment for manufacturing.[106] In addition to that role the UK Government also had responsibility for fiscal measures including corporation tax and the research and development tax credits. [107]

52. The Minister explained that the UK Government also provides business support products including the Knowledge Transfer Partnerships (KTPs), the collaborative R&D programme and the small firms' loan guarantee scheme. "Some of the best practice elements I think are also UK wide. We obviously have responsibility as well for the technology strategy for science policy".[108]

Welsh Assembly Government's Economic Policy

53. The Welsh Assembly Government's responsibilities and policies for economic development and manufacturing were set out in its publication "A Winning Wales".[109] That policy document stressed the importance of raising the skill base within Wales to ensure that the needs of employers are met;[110] expanding opportunities for Research and Development[111], and Innovation in Wales, improving access to markets by enhancing the infrastructure in Wales;[112] and promoting information and communications technologies.[113] In the foreword to Winning Wales, Rhodri Morgan AM, First Minister of the National Assembly stated that the key objectives were to:

increase the knowledge, research and development, and innovation capacity in all parts of the Welsh economy;

build on our considerable strengths in manufacturing;

increase the number of jobs in financial and business services; and

help more people into jobs to bring down our levels of economic inactivity.[114]

54. The majority of economic policy in the United Kingdom is determined at a macro-economic level by the UK Government. However, in its memorandum to us the Welsh Assembly Government set out what it saw as the key role that the UK Government had to play in complementing its economic policies. They were to:

invest in improved communication links between Wales and its markets in the UK and in Europe;

boost financial incentives for companies to invest in training and R&D. In particular, higher tax credits for companies operating in the Assisted Areas could play a key part in the promotion of the knowledge economy outside of the South East of England;

relocate Government-sponsored R&D facilities in Wales to draw on the expertise of Welsh universities and to help create the critical mass necessary for more R&D-driven manufacturing; and

make a determined effort to help universities to become centres of excellence and even stronger engines for growth in their regions.[115]

55. Andrew Davies, stressed the importance of developing a high skill economy as Wales faced stiff competition not only from East and Central Europe, North Africa but increasingly from China for the lower functions of manufacturing.[116] In order to meet that challenge the Welsh Assembly Government convened a manufacturing task and finish group working with the industry. That group reported in May 2004 and stated that the challenge that faced Wales was "to transform its manufacturing from high volume, low value added production to low volume, high value added production".[117] Andrew Davies explained that "all our policies in manufacturing are related to that challenge".[118]

56. Jacqui Smith MP, the DTI Minister, agreed with that aim. She recognised that the UK should not or could not attempt to compete on the basis of low costs and particularly low labour costs,[119] and declared that the UK's focus needed to be on skills innovation, best practice, investment, all underpinned by the continuing macro-economic stability that would be crucial for ensuring that that is successful.[120] Jacqui Smith further argued that the core principles of the Government's manufacturing strategy were based around how to raise investment, how to get businesses to invest more, how science and innovation can be applied to successful manufacturing.[121]

The United Kingdom's Position outside the Euro Zone

57. During our evidence sessions we canvassed the views of our witnesses on the United Kingdom's position outside of the Euro zone. Dr Smith of Swansea Business School explained that he had conducted a survey of the largest businesses in Wales, alongside a stratified sample of small businesses across Wales, and business groups and organisations. He told us that he found that businesses in Wales "were in favour of joining the euro as soon as possible, and believed that other countries and regions in Europe that were already in the euro, had substantial commercial advantages".[122]

58. Our witnesses from the manufacturing sector confirmed that, in general, their preference was for the United Kingdom to join the Euro zone. Joachim Reinhart, Chief Operating Officer of Matsushita, told us that he saw the UK's position outside of the Euro zone as a disadvantage for Matsushita because it had a significant amount of trade with countries within the Euro zone.[123] Furthermore, John Gardner, stated that Ford had been consistent in "trying to encourage the UK to join the Euro at the earliest opportunity".[124]

59. However, the underlying reason for that view was a desire for even greater stability in the currency markets. Joachim Reinhart welcomed the greater stability between Sterling and the Euro[125] and argued that "stability is important, but I think by being in the Euro zone that obviously increases your stability".[126] John Barbagallo, Managing Director of Angelesy Aluminium, stated that while he did not have a "positive or negative view" on the UK's position, currency stability was an important factor in profitablility. [127] Similarly, David Aykroyd of Aykroyd & Sons believed that the relative strengths of Sterling, the Euro and the Dollar were more important factors than the UK's position within or outside of the Euro zone.[128]

60. Brian Fleet, Senior Vice President of AirBus also saw the strength or weakness of the Dollar as a major concern, not least because large commercial aircraft were sold using Dollars.[129] However, he believed that the UK's position outside of the Euro zone represented a hindrance to Airbus.[130] Julian Scopes, from BAE Systems did not consider the UK's position as having a significant impact on BAe's business; but he stated BAE's desire that the UK to be inside the Eurozone as it would "provide a greater degree of overall stability on currencies".[131] Both witnesses put a higher value on stability in the currency markets than on any policy decision to change the currency of the United Kingdom.

61. The debate surrounding the United Kingdom's entry into the Euro zone has often been conducted in a highly political environment. Therefore, it was enlightening to find a general level of agreement from our witnesses on the economic benefits of the United Kingdom joining the Euro zone. In the absence of such a move, a stable exchange rate between Sterling, the Euro and the Dollar was considered vital. We conclude that the Government should place a greater emphasis on the economic benefits and disbenefits to manufacturing of the United Kingdom joining the Euro zone.

Access to Government

62. The success of those policies depend not only on the relationship between the Welsh Assembly Government and the UK Government but also on clear lines of communication and responsibility that can be accessed easily by business. It is important that clear advice is given on which institution is responsible for which aspect of economic policy and assistance. CBI Wales argued that in the aftermath of devolution there had been a different approach taken by the DTI on non-devolved matters; "there is either a reluctance or a nervousness to cross the border. […] It is no more than a sense but I see no sign of the UK government actively involved in economic development in Wales.[132] TUC Wales argued that the immediate aftermath of devolution had led to some confusion and complications with regard to political responsibility over economic matters. It stated that "many business people came to the view that somehow it was the [National] Assembly they needed to look to rather than the DTI".[133] However it acknowledged that although the DTI's activity in Wales went on to the back foot in the aftermath of devolution, that approach was now being remedied.[134] The Federation of Small Businesses also saw a different approach taken to contact with Governmental institutions: "manufacturers in Wales tend now to deal to a greater extent with the Assembly rather than the DTI".[135] The Federation of Small Businesses was of the view that the DTI was not "any less proactive in Wales than it was".[136]

63. Professor Wahab from Delta Microelectronics, explained that while he had little contact with the UK Government, the opposite was true of the National Assembly and the Welsh Assembly Government. He believed that devolution had been a significant benefit to manufacturing in Wales "you can access Ministers very easily at all levels, and your Assembly Members. You can access different parts of the [Welsh] Assembly Government machine which is very important".[137] As a result, more attention was paid to Wales.[138] He further argued that this situation would be improved if the Welsh Assembly Government had a greater control over regional development policy.[139]

64. Often the size of the enterprise appeared to dictate their involvement with each tier of Government. Anglesey Aluminium told us that they had good direct contacts with the DTI and also had an input into the Department through its membership of the Aluminium Federation in the UK.[140] At the other end of the scale, Akroyd and Son, explained that it had "absolutely no contact with the DTI" but had " a great deal of contact with the WDA"[141]

65. It is clear that the UK Government and the Welsh Assembly Government are making strides to ensure that their economic policies complement each other to the benefit of the Welsh economy. Equally important is the need to demonstrate clearly to business which institution is responsible for each part of that policy. In general we conclude that business is aware of the distinction and, in particular is able to access the Welsh Assembly Government with ease.


106   Q889 Back

107   Q889 Back

108   Q889 Back

109   www.wales.gov.uk Back

110   Ev290 Back

111   Ev290 Back

112   Ev291 Back

113   Ev291 Back

114   www.wales.gov.uk/themesbudgetandstrategic/content/neds/awinningwales-0302-e.pdf Back

115   Ev289 Back

116   Q847 Back

117   www.wales.gov.uk Back

118   Q843 Back

119   Q895 Back

120   Q895 Back

121   Q895 Back

122   Q452 Back

123   Q96 Back

124   Q97 Back

125   Q97 Back

126   Q98 Back

127   Q291 Back

128   Q292 Back

129   Q164 Back

130   Q176 Back

131   Q176 Back

132   Q344 Back

133   Q523 Back

134   Q523 Back

135   Q623 Back

136   Q623 Back

137   Q729 Back

138   Q732 Back

139   Q731 Back

140   Q271 Back

141   Q294 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 24 February 2005