Select Committee on Welsh Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 140-151)

27 OCTOBER 2004

Chief Constable Barbara Wilding, and Mr Paul Wade

  Q140 Mr Caton: If we asked your partners what do they feel they are not getting from the police in the partnership at the moment, what answer do you think we would get?

  Chief Constable Wilding: One Chief Executive told me very bluntly that he wanted police officers or police staff to sit in the CCTV suite. That is what he thought he wanted. That is not a role for my staff frankly. I think it is those expectations which are unreal in the main because in my first two weeks of being in the post I went round and saw every Chief Executive. I wanted to see what their view of partnership was and I also wanted them to know that I would have high expectations of their involvement in partnership as well. I did ask the question as you may ask: what could I do to make it work better? That was the only one that came forward to me. Whether it is because they did not know me very well then and did not quite know how I would react, whether I would take it seriously. It is interesting that I have seen them in normal business now and I do not get that feeling that they feel that we are being tardy in any respect because, of course, a lot of my BCU commanders use their BCU fund to pump crime, various activities in the partnership.

  Q141 Mr Caton: Are there any changes in structure or procedures in the partnerships that could improve working relationships?

  Chief Constable Wilding: If I could replicate what they have in Rhondda Cynon Taff, which is a purpose-built building where they have a member of every partner there in the building, and this is where we start to have the intelligence staff as well, the joint intelligence staff for every partner. That is where we are starting that there. They are there in the building. They have meetings regularly in the building. They identify the same issues. It is wonderful, but it has not been evaluated yet. I only opened it a few months ago, but I look forward to the evaluation because there will be so many positives that will come out of it and the intelligence sharing will only be better. They have replicated it in a number of my partnerships but been very much constrained around accommodation in the main. It is not that people do not want to get on board and be there and second staff. It is just that they do not have the accommodation. I went into one office at Rhondda Cynon Taff and they had the licensing officer, the fire officer as well and someone from the environment agency as well all working in the same office. It just works very, very well. Across the road were children services as well, across the corridor, not across the road, but you have the Chief Executive there who really understands the value of partnership working. He was the Chief Executive I was hoping to bring before you today to show that this is what a good partnership looks like and what we are all striving to work for. He is unfortunately going off to Hull, he is leaving us and going off to Hull but his model will live on. I would like to replicate that across my Force area because I believe it is best practice.

  Q142 Mr Caton: I was very impressed in Swansea recently where the prison is one of the partners in the partnership and they had actually got prisoners to write a booklet telling people how to avoid suffering from the crimes that they had committed. It is very readable and quite an effective method. You have at least three prisons in your patch anyway. Are the prison always partners?

  Chief Constable Wilding: We have spread the partnership as widely as possible. We even have the Chief Executive of Dara from down in Barry who is also on the partnership as well who talks about the fact he has thousands in his workforce, between 2,000 and 3,000 in the workforce and needs the educational people to get on to really make sure he has a workforce to recruit from for the future as well, and what they can do with young people who are going slightly off the rails, how they can help the community as well. The partnership can be as wide as you want. The only problem with the partnerships that David has very neatly reminded me of is the fact that they have a 3-year strategy and their funding is only for 12 months. That is really difficult, very difficult and makes things therefore short term. How can you embark on long term solution fixing when the funding is only for 12 months? May I say it goes beyond that because we are as policing as Paul would go wax lyrically about the difficulties we have with not knowing even now how much money we are going to have for next year.

  Q143 Dr Francis: When you come to evaluate these community safety partnership do you publish them as examples of good practice because it seems to me that there are several examples of good practice. Whilst we have been hearing quite a lot about Swansea could I say that in recent meetings that I   have had in the Afan Valley the communities there,   particularly Glyncorrwg have been very complimentary about community policing. We should remember that I think it was Glyncorrwg that had the very first ASBO and it took a lot of courage for those communities to do that. Given those kinds of examples of excellent partnerships, would it be a good idea to be publishing this work and celebrating it?

  Chief Constable Wilding: Just before I hand on to David. Crime Concern have come in and done evaluations of a number of our partnerships to be able to see where we are, and they are doing the one in Merthyr Tydfil at the moment as well, so we do evaluate but I will hand over to David.

  Assistant Chief Constable Francis: It is such an important point that we do need to spread the best practice. If I were to say that the partnerships are on a journey and as they mature so we are learning so much from them, but they are at different stages of maturity. One of the things the overarching leadership group would want to do and is capable of doing is saying: let us do some benchmarking against each other, no threats there. There is a self assessment tool published by the Home Office I think we could improve on, and use that as the method of sharing our best practice. It is happening, but it has been happening without the structure that we think should be there. A good example would be dealing with anti-social behaviour in the different partnerships was progressing well. By bringing the framework in we have been able to try and spread that good practice across South Wales. That is what really should be done with the partnerships as well.

  Q144 Dr Francis: Would you say that what I mentioned about the Afan Valley is the case. Are their communities quite far down that journey?

  Chief Constable Wilding: I visited the Valley actually and David and I were with the local authority on Monday, and of course the Mayor comes from there as well, so I was able to hear firsthand how he feels about it. Certainly from our perspective it is good practice, it is working well, and it is very effective.

  Assistant Chief Constable Francis: Can I say that the South Wales anti-social behaviour framework is based on what we call the Rees boys started in Neath Port Talbot, Tim Rees and Steve Rees, started that and from that embryo became the framework.

  Q145 Hywel Williams: What is the difference between being a Chief Constable in England and a Chief Constable in Wales, and I am thinking in particular of the impact on the National Assembly and the Welsh Assembly Government, how does that impact on policing and the Force itself?

  Chief Constable Wilding: Like my English colleagues, I am of course am the head of my profession and direction comes from the Home Office in the main. However, the Welsh Assembly have particularly looked at the reassurance and regeneration aspects and that ties into one part of our work very clearly. We have an open access to the minister. Indeed, I have seen the first minister on many occasions and discussed local issues. The first minister has been out to look at areas with us and discuss things with us. It is that firsthand experience and they are able, in some ways, to contribute to funding for us in particular areas. Indeed, as you are probably aware, they contributed towards funding the 30 extra police officers working within the educational side of Tarian on drugs. They were able to access some pockets of funding from them, very much working in the reassurance area. They extended the dependency abuse scheme to alcohol as well, which is very welcome, so they are certainly funding part of Tarian. They are also going to fund the extra support for health for the treatment for drugs, which is very welcome. I just would like it to roll out a bit quicker than perhaps it is. I would say to you: we have the benefit of a region where we are able to discuss at a local, regional level real issues, policing issues, and that perhaps over my colleagues in England the governance, to a degree, of Wales is helped to be formed by our professional experience and judgment because we are able to give it. It is a fact, of course, in the Home Office the policies and plans are done by civil servants and the contact is through the ACPO hierarchy, whereas we 4 Chief Constables regularly meet with the social justice minister and we are listened to and there is a lot of interaction between us. I believe that our professional judgment is valued and I would like to see that replicated in England.

  Q146 Hywel Williams: I was really impressed reading the report about the commitment that you have made to Communities First and I think 72 police officers working very interestingly. Just to go   back to the relationship with the National Assembly. You have mentioned that you speak with the minister and with the first minister. What is the focus of that relationship? Are they the people with the hands on the levers of power? Do you feel that actually works? What is the focus of your relationship? Is it at that level?

  Chief Constable Wilding: I meet with a number of ministers including transport and economy as well because policing is very central to the economy of Wales. If we do not provide, as I said before, that security and stability then nobody is going to come and invest in there, so economic growth only comes when you have security and stability. The focus is around policies and us being able to influence and being asked for our views and being able to influence our policies. We an all-Wales emergency services group where we meet with all the other emergency services including the military as well as chief officers. We have a group that also has the chairs of the Police Authorities and the Chief Constables meet and the Programme Board for the collaboration as well. We inform the minister of what we are doing. It is very much focus about what makes the social environment and the regeneration of Wales better and where the policing fits into that.

  Q147 Hywel Williams: In paragraph 3.3 you discuss concerns about the impact on short term and centralised funding, which is to deal with the Force's local and long term problem solving requirements; this is something we discussed with the Chief in Dyfed-Powys as well. How do you think that this should be addressed?

  Chief Constable Wilding: I will hand over to Paul here who is our expert in these areas.

  Paul Wade: Any short term funding makes it very difficult for us to decide how we should tackle a problem over the long term. What we find is we have to issue many fixed term contracts which can only extend for the life of the funding that is available us to. It means our strategies can only be as long as the funding is available. With all the changes going on in employment law fixed term contracts are becoming as difficult and possibly cost expensive at the end as a full-time employment is, so obviously, offering advice to the Chief and the Police Authority. What we cannot do is put ourselves in a position where we have incurred expenditure without knowing where the funding stream is coming from. I would like to see some more commitment to longer term funding than 12 months. three years is difficult to manage, but it is far easier to manipulate three year funding than it is 12 month funding. 12 month is very, very difficult.

  Q148 Hywel Williams: I am sure it is no comfort but this committee sometime ago looked at social exclusion and community projects. They all said the same basically: you cannot work on a 12 month basis. You did, in fact, refer to that in an answer to Mr Caton. The implications of dealing with that particular issue are short-termism, difficulty in planning?

  Paul Wade: By the time the people we have employed from that stream of funding have really become contributors to our plan the funding runs out and then we have to make decisions: do we dog ear funding from elsewhere to keep that resource which has an impact somewhere else in the Force or do we have to end that particular initiative and accept it will decrease our service in a certain area.

  Chief Constable Wilding: The PCSOs will be a very good example of that. It is a very complex issue now about the first, second and third tranche. The people we brought in on the second and third tranche, the funding reduces, I think if you explain, Paul, because it is so complex.

  Paul Wade: With the current phase there are 4 phases of PCSOs. In phase 1, the Force was not successful with its bid. In phase 2 and 3 we were successful, but in phase 2 we funded some of our 63 from our own resource, some from the BCU fund, which unfortunately has now been withdrawn as an available source of funding to us, 50% from the Home Office funding, the partnership the Chief mentioned earlier working in RCT, they also funded 50% of five. We have also had agreement with the City and County of Cardiff that they will fund some as well. What we are now finding is because these streams of funding are altering constantly it has become extremely difficult for us to maintain the level of service in those areas. Without expanding too much, phases one, two and three have now been extended to 31 March 2008. Phase 4, the one we are not aware of what our bid will be successful for, it is 100% funded during 2005-06 and then becomes 75% funded during 2006-07, so again we have to be careful because our resources have been directed by certain objectives and the funding may not always be targeted at the areas we would most like to tackle, but we have to do it to obtain this additional funding from central or regional government.

  Chief Constable Wilding: We have to manage, juggle this all the time which is what we were doing last week in two days of planning. I have made the commitment and I did when I first came in: that first tranche of PCSOs, the 63 that we have now, we will build into base budgets somehow; we are looking at ways of doing that. I will not go below that. I will build that into base, but any expansion on that I have to look for other resources which, again, is my role to look for other resources to be able to support that because they are so valuable to the community.

  Q149 Julie Morgan: I have some questions about the structure now. Is the current structure of the oversight and the accountability of police services effective? Do you feel it enables Forces to deliver local and national priorities?

  Chief Constable Wilding: The oversight: it is multi-tiered really. At one time, the number of inspections going on in a Force and was subject to ran into hundreds, never mind if not thousands. You can imagine the number of recommendations that come out of that and your opportunity to complete on those recommendations in a year frankly becomes a bit farcical. At the moment as a service we are subject to obviously the Police Authority because we have to be an efficient and effective service. That is our first port of call. Secondly, we then have Her Majesty's Inspector Constabulary who look at how we deliver things. Then we have the Police Standards Unit which looks at what we deliver and our performance. We have all the audit areas of our performance being looked at. Auditing clearly is necessary when you are dealing with the sort of money that we are dealing with and public expectation, et cetera, et cetera. It is very important, if it could be graded in a slightly better way that we were not constantly putting resources into supplying data for a whole myriad of people. I have the statistics here of how much it costs us to supply data to a whole range of people. The overall cost is £328,000 in just the people we employ to receive the data and marshal it. That does not cover the opportunity costs of those who actually then gather the data first before it goes to the receivers. It is an awful lot of the public's money that is being gathered to fulfil this complete plethora of different ways that people want the same data gathered. If you had one structure that managed everybody's concerns we would probably be able to release more of the public's money to put into operational policing.

  Q150 Julie Morgan: What about the other part of the structure? Would you believe in directly elected police boards, for example, that is something that has been put forward as a possibility?

  Chief Constable Wilding: Yes, I do understand. It has been my experience that depending on—and

  I work with a number of police authorities as you will understand as a chief

  officer—depending on the make up of the Police Authority then it either has all the business acumen, the public acumen, the people acumen, et cetera, or in some cases it needs to be supplemented with independent people then, et cetera, but providing the independent elected people have all the right skills and resources to be able to do their job I do not see any problem with it, frankly. I do not see any problem at all.

  Q151 Julie Morgan: In evidence to this Committee last week the Chief Constable of Dyfed-Powys police suggested the Gwent Force be abolished and as a logical alternative would be the amalgamation of Gwent and South Wales. Do you have any comments on this? You have heard this before?

  Chairman: You must have heard it before.

  Chief Constable Wilding: Yes. The logic for this— may I answer the most exciting question. The logic for this seems to come from the fact that the fire brigade went down from eight to three, that we should be coterminous, that two of my BCUs are with the fire brigade that covers Dyfed-Powys and the other fire brigade covers Gwent and the other five areas of mine. I do not see why we have to be coterminous with the fire brigade: is it good for policing. That is what I would say. What is good for policing may not necessarily be good for the other emergency services. The ambulance is one. I would never suggest there ought to be one police service for Wales because of the northern dimension and its influences from the north-west. I would never say that. If I were to look at a structure for Wales I would be saying it is the local structure we must get right. I think that each of the three Forces has probably got that right. It is the next level, the level 2 that we are working on collaborating on at the moment which, as I have said, Dyfed-Powys do not get the exposure to certain crimes to keep their staff levels and their competency levels right. We are looking at that. Then when you have that right, the governance becomes a different issue. This is exactly what I said to the Police Authorities of Wales two weeks ago when I did a presentation on collaboration. For me, it is about the local part. It is irrelevant where the governance comes from in a way. If you have the local contact talking to local people, got the channels in, we are delivering good local service, we have a good structure then for specialist areas, you have a good structure, the capability and capacity to deliver across the three, then the governance becomes a different issue. I think that is where the debate ought to be in some time, when we have these other parts in place.

  Chairman: Thank you. You will be delighted to know there are no further questions so you do not have to come back after the division.





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 23 March 2005