Select Committee on Welsh Affairs Written Evidence


18. Written evidence from Nacro Cymru

  Nacro Cymru, the crime reduction charity in Wales, welcomes the opportunity to submit written evidence to the Welsh Affairs Committee in relation to the Police service, crime and anti-social behaviour in Wales Inquiry.

  Nacro Cymru's role and experience of working on crime reduction issues means we are able to respond to the following areas of the inquiry:

    —  Tackling anti-social behaviour and reducing volume crime

    —  The reassurance agenda

    —  Partnerships.

Tackling anti-social behaviour and reducing volume crime

  Nacro Cymru advocates that local areas should seek to tackle anti-social behaviour as part of a balanced strategy, which includes prevention, education, enforcement and rehabilitation. A focus on one type of intervention at the expense of others can only result in a quick fix at the expense of any long term solutions.

  Nacro Cymru believes that the three main elements to tackling anti-social behaviour should be:

    —  A mix of interventions, including prevention, education, enforcement and rehabilitation.

    —  Interventions should be targeted at three levels: universal; groups or localities particularly at risk; and individuals particularly at risk.

    —  Interventions should both target risk factors and seek to maximise protective factors.

  Nacro Cymru is also concerned about the geographical variations in tackling anti-social behaviour, both across England and Wales, and within Wales.

  In relation to the use of Anti-social Behaviour Orders (ASBOs) we believe there should be an integrated and graded approach, as used in police areas such as Devon and Cornwall, and community safety areas such as Rhondda Cynon Taff. In these areas ASBOs are used in a tiered format, with youth or police officers using diversion work to keep young people out of trouble.

  Nacro is concerned by the current arrangements for Breach of an ASBO and by the findings of a recent NAPO survey which highlights the number of young people being placed in custody as a result of breaching an ASBO. Nacro would like to see more use of division and education as part of breach.

  Nacro Cymru welcomes the recent changes to the Home Office Public Service Agreements (PSAs) in relation to volume crime. In the past, requiring all local areas to reduce volume crime by certain levels caused problems for those areas where burglary and vehicle crime were not such an issue. The new PSA targets allow local partnerships to identify and tackle local key issues, and this must be allowed to remain.

The reassurance agenda

  Nacro Cymru is concerned that one of the main issues within the public reassurance agenda is matching public expectations with the ability of criminal justice agencies to deliver. For example, while the public may demand a police officer on every corner, resources dictate that this could never be possible. Therefore, agencies need to work with communities to ensure that the public understand resource pressures and action is targeted at areas which meet local need within limited resources. As part of this process it is particularly important that young people and other "hard-to-reach" communities are fully involved in the community consultation process.

  Nacro Cymru is also concerned about the use of "fear of crime" surveys to record levels of fear amongst the public. There should be clearer guidelines in the use of such surveys and the way results are taken and analysed. If used inappropriately, fear of crime surveys can simply exacerbate the issue.

  Nacro Cymru is particularly concerned that all sections of the community, especially minority groups, are able to feel safe and do not fear crime. The Home Office PSA outlines the need to "reduce race inequality and build social inclusion". Nacro Cymru is aware that this must apply equally to all areas, regardless of the number of minority groups in a locality. In fact, in areas where there are fewer ethnic minority groups, individuals can feel more isolated and in fear of crime. We believe it is important to provide support for virtual and isolated groups, and would encourage agencies to think about methods of providing this support, including telephone and internet support.

Partnerships

  In Wales, Nacro Cymru would welcome a form of co-ordination and strategic development across all 22 Community Safety Partnerships. Nacro Cymru fully supports the work of the All Wales Community Safety Forum and believes that this group has a key role to play in consolidating community safety issues on an all-Wales basis and dealing with strategic matters of importance. Such a forum provides an excellent way of gathering new policy and practice ideas on community safety and could provide local agencies in Wales with a voice to report back to the Welsh Assembly Government and the Westminster Government.

  Nacro Cymru believes that there should be a clearer and more significant role for voluntary and community sector organisations on local community safety partnerships. Indeed, the Home Office PSA sets targets in relation to "increasing voluntary and community engagement". More resources should be put forward to allow voluntary and community groups to contribute to local community safety partnerships. Meanwhile, there should be a clear expectation that community safety partnerships should provide mechanisms so that voluntary and community groups are engaged at an operational and strategic level. In Manchester, Nacro has been funded to develop a voluntary sector community safety forum, and this provides an excellent example of how the sector can be engaged within community safety partnerships.

  Nacro Cymru would like to see a review of Section 17 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998, in order to build confidence in the viability and applicability of Section 17 as a driver for delivering tangible community safety gains for local communities. The purpose of this section of the Act was "to give the vital work of preventing crime a new focus across a very wide range of local services". Nacro believes that although Section 17 remains a powerful vehicle, its implementation has been variable, particularly because of a perceived "lack of teeth"—few sanctions appear to have been imposed on authorities who do not implement Section 17, and responsibility across local authorities has remained "ghettoised" within community safety teams.

Nacro Cymru

18 January 2005





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 23 March 2005