Select Committee on Work and Pensions Written Evidence


Supplementary memorandum by Lancashire County Council Welfare Rights Service (PC 08A)

  The Pension Service are saying "now that local partnerships are in place" which gives the impression that there are now other places where people can go for advice so that they do not need so many information points. What this means in Lancashire is that premises for surgeries have been drastically cut back without any replacements. For example, replacing five or six a week "local" surgeries by just one central surgery a week. This not only restricts the venues where pensioners can get face to face advice but also makes it more difficult for pensioners to comply with request for verification of documents such as bank books and birth certificates.

  We know that the "scans" are an inaccurate way of identifying potential PC claimants, not least because they cannot identify how much savings or private income a person has. But what is worse is that because of the targets set for "scanning work" the local service are cutting back on home visits to people identified by our service as being in the hardest to reach category with genuine claims.

  Additionally, the local service are no longer prepared to fill in Attendance Allowance and/or Carers Allowance forms on home visit which means that those customers they do visit will not end up with the full amount of PC or will be turned down when their PC claim relies on being awarded the other benefit.

  They may be doing "more" visits now, I can't comment on that, but certainly some visits will be to verify savings/income which people would in the past have taken into a "local" surgery but now can't get into the one central surgery which is left which might be miles away. Also many of the visits from the scan work will have no chance of a successful claim from the start. The Minister does not refer in the extract of the letter we have been copied how many of these scan prompted visits result on an award of PC but Pension service staff speaking off the record to us say that it is very frustrating work because so few scan visits lead to awards. We also understand that the targets given to Pension Service staff relate only to the number of contacts they are required to make not to the number of awards.

James Dickson

January 2005





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 9 March 2005