Select Committee on Work and Pensions Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Mr and Mrs Hunter (CS 07)

  We thank you for your letter of 21 April regarding the CSA.

  Prior to receiving your letter, we received another from of the Department for Work and Pensions. We are enclosing a copy of our subsequent reply to this letter.

  We wish to use the contents of this attached letter as our official complaint regarding the grave stress caused to families such as ours, due to the misgivings of the so-called Child Support Agency.

  Because our son is already under much stress, we wish the complaint to be made, not on a personal level, but a complaint on behalf of all dads suffering the same or similar injustices. They cannot be expected to continue paying 30% it is ludicrous.

  All we ask is that you read the attached letter, and act on this at a meeting of inquiry, and letting us know the outcome.

LETTER TO THE DEPARTMENT FOR WORK AND PENSIONS

  We feel it very necessary to write a reply to your letter of 16 April. Your letter fails to address any issue whatsoever mentioned by us. All you have done is reiterate the Child Support Agency rules and regulations, which we are all so fully aware of. We question these so-called rules and regulations as downright criminal and words fail us as to how you can possibly try to justify such a badly run organisation. With all due respect you are truly a million miles away from reality.

  You raise the point "All children have the right to a decent start in life". Our son (like most decent fathers) does not need to be given patronising comments such as this. If he were still at home with his wife and child they would never have contemplated allocating the ridiculous monthly amount the CSA demand from him alone. This is on top of family allowance received and the money the mother earns. Women are discovering they are having a far better life than ever before, thanks to the CSA. You state that you can understand people on the old system wishing to transfer to the new system, yet this could take up to five years, with no rebate! It is also stated that people on the old system will not transfer to the new system until it is seen to be working. We think this is the most infuriating statement under the sun. The old system is obviously not working and yet it is not sure if the new system is functional either! What a disgusting state of affairs this is.

  Could we ask, how YOU would feel IF you were doing exactly the same job as a colleague, and you were paying TWICE as much Tax as he/she. Would you not expect the Inland Revenue to get their act in order so that everyone was equal? Would you also think it fair that YOU would be paying twice as much for nearly five years and there was no intention of a rebate to you?

  Our son is unfortunate enough already to have had to separate from an abusive wife, now he is treated like a criminal with a HUGE FlNE to pay for 18 years. This is NOT RIGHT, the outlining principle of the CSA may have been ok, BUT in reality this is proving to be so very wrong, unrealistic figures such as 30% is unbelievable. The CSA also shows total disregard to the sex-discrimination act, and in our view the Human Rights Act also.

  We ask these final questions, with great sincerity.

    —  "Could you work every week of your life for nothing?".

    —  Could you imagine your parents approaching 60 (as we are) having to sell their home to stop you reaching a great state of depression?

    —  This is all fact, this is what depths the CSA has led us to as a Family.

  These are the questions that need to be addressed and answered, THEN, someone, somewhere needs to stand up and do something to change this whole criminal matter. We truly fail to see how anyone with any morals could work for or represent such an organisation as the CSA. We hold the Government totally responsible for condoning the CSA, forcing us into selling our home and the fact our son feels his life is hardly worth living.

9 June 2004





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 26 January 2005