House of Commons portcullis
House of Commons
Session 2005 - 06
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament


 
 

S.C.B.  Standing Committee Proceedings: 28th June 2005            

26

 

Finance Bill, continued

 
 

‘(1A)    

But Condition 1 is not satisfied if the whole or substantially the whole by fair

 

value of the assets of the issuing company are income producing.’.

 

Dawn Primarolo

 

Agreed to  80

 

Schedule  7,  page  97,  line  43,  at end insert—

 

‘(aa)    

any share as respects which Condition 1 above is satisfied or would, apart

 

from subsection (1A) above, be satisfied;’.

 

Dawn Primarolo

 

Agreed to  81

 

Schedule  7,  page  97,  line  45,  at end insert ‘or would, apart from subsection (1)(c)

 

of that section (excepted shares), be satisfied’.

 

Dawn Primarolo

 

Agreed to  82

 

Schedule  7,  page  98,  line  4,  at end insert—

 

‘(e)    

rights under a repo in relation to which section 730A of the Taxes Act

 

1988 applies;

 

(f)    

any share in a company the whole or substantially the whole by fair value

 

of whose assets are assets within paragraphs (a) to (e) above.’.

 

Dawn Primarolo

 

Agreed to  83

 

Schedule  7,  page  98,  line  30,  leave out ‘subsection (4)’ and insert ‘subsections (4)

 

and (4A)’.

 

Dawn Primarolo

 

Agreed to  84

 

Schedule  7,  page  98,  line  40,  at end insert—

 

‘(4A)    

But a share is not a qualifying publicly issued share for those purposes if the

 

investing company’s purpose in acquiring the share is an unallowable purpose by

 

virtue of subsection (8)(a) below.’.

 

Dawn Primarolo

 

Agreed to  85

 

Schedule  7,  page  99,  line  5,  leave out ‘of the investing company’.

 

Dawn Primarolo

 

Agreed to  86

 

Schedule  7,  page  99,  line  17,  leave out ‘of the investing company’.

 

Dawn Primarolo

 

Agreed to  87

 

Schedule  7,  page  99,  line  25,  leave out ‘except where the share is a qualifying

 

publicly issued share,’.

 

Dawn Primarolo

 

Agreed to  88

 

Schedule  7,  page  99,  line  33,  leave out from ‘if’ to end of line 39 and insert ‘the

 

investing company was an associated company of a bank (see subsection (10)) at the time

 

when the investing company acquired the share, unless the investing company shows

 

that—


 
 

S.C.B.  Standing Committee Proceedings: 28th June 2005            

27

 

Finance Bill, continued

 
 

(a)    

immediately before that time, some or all of its business consisted in

 

making and holding investments, and

 

(b)    

it acquired the share in the ordinary course of that business.’.

 

Dawn Primarolo

 

Agreed to  89

 

Schedule  7,  page  99,  line  45,  leave out from beginning to end of line 2 on page 100

 

and insert—

 

‘“bank” has the meaning given by section 840A of the Taxes Act 1988;’.

 

Dawn Primarolo

 

Agreed to  90

 

Schedule  7,  page  100,  line  17,  at end insert—

 

‘(1A)    

But Condition 3 is not satisfied if—

 

(a)    

Condition 1 in section 91C above is satisfied as respects the share or

 

would, apart from subsection (1A) of that section (income producing

 

assets), be so satisfied, or

 

(b)    

Condition 2 in section 91D above is satisfied as respects the share or

 

would, apart from subsection (1)(c) of that section (excepted shares), be

 

so satisfied.’.

 

Mr Philip Hammond

 

Mr Richard Spring

 

Mr Mark Field

 

Mr Mark Francois

 

Mr David Ruffley

 

Withdrawn  130

 

Schedule  7,  page  100,  line  29,  leave out sub-paragraph (5).

 

Mr Philip Hammond

 

Mr Richard Spring

 

Mr Mark Field

 

Mr Mark Francois

 

Mr David Ruffley

 

Withdrawn  131

 

Schedule  7,  page  101,  line  26,  at end insert—

 

‘(2A)    

But subsection (2) above shall not apply to a share which meets the conditions in

 

paragraphs (a) and (b) of subsection (3) below but does not meet the condition in

 

paragraph (c) of that subsection.’.

 

Mr Philip Hammond

 

Mr Richard Spring

 

Mr Mark Field

 

Mr Mark Francois

 

Mr David Ruffley

 

Not called  132

 

Schedule  7,  page  101,  line  30,  leave out ‘and’.


 
 

S.C.B.  Standing Committee Proceedings: 28th June 2005            

28

 

Finance Bill, continued

 
 

Mr Philip Hammond

 

Mr Richard Spring

 

Mr Mark Field

 

Mr Mark Francois

 

Mr David Ruffley

 

Not called  133

 

Schedule  7,  page  101,  line  32,  at end insert—

 

    

‘and

 

(c)    

the conditions in section 91A(1) and 91B(1) do not cease to be satisfied

 

on or before 31st December 2005.’.

 

Mr Philip Hammond

 

Mr Richard Spring

 

Mr Mark Field

 

Mr Mark Francois

 

Mr David Ruffley

 

Withdrawn  134

 

Schedule  7,  page  103,  line  26,  at end insert—

 

‘(iii)    

an intangible fixed asset within the meaning of Schedule 29 to

 

the Finance Act 2002.’.

 

Mr Philip Hammond

 

Mr Richard Spring

 

Mr Mark Field

 

Mr Mark Francois

 

Mr David Ruffley

 

Withdrawn  135

 

Schedule  7,  page  105,  leave out line 29 and insert ‘investing in a creditor relationship,

 

with comparable risk and liquidity, issued by an independent party.’.

 

Mr Philip Hammond

 

Mr Richard Spring

 

Mr Mark Field

 

Mr Mark Francois

 

Mr David Ruffley

 

Withdrawn  143

 

Schedule  7,  page  105,  line  42,  at end insert—

 

‘Capital redemption policies - capital loss treatment

 

13A      (1)    

Section 210 of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 is amended as

 

follows—

 

      (2)    

After subsection (12) insert—

 

“(12A)    

Where a person makes a disposal of a capital redemption policy,

 

within the meaning of Chapter 2 of Part 13 of the Taxes Act 1988, then

 

no allowable loss shall accrue to that person.”.’.

 

Mr Philip Hammond

 

Mr Richard Spring

 

Mr Mark Field

 

Mr Mark Francois

 

Mr David Ruffley

 

Not called  141

 

Schedule  7,  page  105,  line  43,  leave out from beginning to end of line 36 on page


 
 

S.C.B.  Standing Committee Proceedings: 28th June 2005            

29

 

Finance Bill, continued

 
 

106.

 

Mr Philip Hammond

 

Mr Richard Spring

 

Mr Mark Field

 

Mr Mark Francois

 

Mr David Ruffley

 

Withdrawn  136

 

Schedule  7,  page  109,  line  9,  leave out from beginning to end of line 23.

 

Mr Philip Hammond

 

Mr Richard Spring

 

Mr Mark Field

 

Mr Mark Francois

 

Mr David Ruffley

 

Not called  137

 

Schedule  7,  page  109,  line  10,  at end insert—

 

‘(2A)    

Where two or more associated companies cease to be members of a group at the

 

same time, sub-paragraph (2) does not have effect in relation to a transfer between

 

those companies.

 

(2B)    

But where—

 

(a)    

a company (“the transferee”) that has ceased to be a member of a group

 

of companies (“the first group”) has been assigned an asset or liability

 

from another company (“the transferor”) which was a member of that

 

group at the time of the transfer, and

 

(b)    

sub-paragraph (3) applies in relation to the transferee’s ceasing to be a

 

member of the first group so that sub-paragraph (2) does not have effect,

 

and

 

(c)    

the transferee subsequently ceases to be a member of another group of

 

companies (“the second group”), and

 

(d)    

there is a relevant connection between the two groups (see sub-paragraph

 

(5)),

 

    

sub-paragraph (2) has effect in relation to the transferee’s ceasing to be a member

 

of the second group as if it were the second group of which both companies had

 

been members at the time of the transfer.

 

(2C)    

For the purposes of sub-paragraph (4) there is a relevant connection between the

 

first group and the second group if, at the time when the transferee ceases to be a

 

member of the second group, the company which is the principal company of that

 

group is under the control of—

 

(a)    

the company that is the principal company of the first group or, if that

 

group no longer exists, was the principal company of that group when the

 

transferee ceased to be a member of it; or

 

(b)    

any person or persons who control the company mentioned in paragraph

 

(a) or who have had it under their control at any time in the period since

 

the transferee ceased to be an member of the first group; or

 

(c)    

any person or persons who have, at any time in that period, had under

 

their control either—

 

(i)    

a company that would have been a person falling within

 

paragraph (b) if it had continued to exist, or

 

(ii)    

a company that would have been a person falling within this

 

paragraph (whether by reference to a company that would have

 

been a person falling within paragraph (b) or by reference to a

 

company or series of companies falling within this provision).


 
 

S.C.B.  Standing Committee Proceedings: 28th June 2005            

30

 

Finance Bill, continued

 
 

(2D)    

The provisions of section 416(2) to (6) of the Taxes Act 1988 (meaning of

 

control) have effect for the purposes of sub-paragraph (5) as they have effect for

 

the purposes of Part 11 of that Act.

 


 

But a person carrying on a business of banking shall not be regarded for those

 

purposes as having control of a company by reason only of having, or of the

 

consequences of having exercised, any rights in respect of loan capital or debt

 

issued or incurred by the company for money lent by that person to the company

 

in the ordinary course of that business.’.

 

Mr Philip Hammond

 

Mr Richard Spring

 

Mr Mark Field

 

Mr Mark Francois

 

Mr David Ruffley

 

Not called  142

 

Schedule  7,  page  111,  line  18,  leave out from beginning to end of line 30.

 

Mr Philip Hammond

 

Mr Richard Spring

 

Mr Mark Field

 

Mr Mark Francois

 

Mr David Ruffley

 

Not called  138

 

Schedule  7,  page  117,  line  37,  leave out from beginning to end of line 8 on page

 

118.

 

Mr Philip Hammond

 

Mr Richard Spring

 

Mr Mark Field

 

Mr Mark Francois

 

Mr David Ruffley

 

Not called  139

 

Schedule  7,  page  117,  line  38,  at end insert—

 

‘(2A)    

Where two or more associated companies cease to be members of a group at the

 

same time, sub-paragraph (2) does not have effect in relation to a transfer between

 

those companies.

 

(2B)    

But where—

 

(a)    

a company (“the transferee”) that has ceased to be a member of a group

 

of companies (“the first group”) has been assigned an asset or liability

 

from another company (“the transferor”) which was a member of that

 

group at the time of the transfer,

 

(b)    

sub-paragraph (3) applies in relation to the transferee’s ceasing to be a

 

member of the first group so that sub-paragraph (2) does not have effect,

 

(c)    

the transferee subsequently ceases to be a member of another group of

 

companies (“the second group”), and

 

(d)    

there is a relevant connection between the two groups (see sub-paragraph

 

(5)),

 

    

sub-paragraph (2) has effect in relation to the transferee’s ceasing to be a member

 

of the second group as if it were the second group of which both companies had

 

been members at the time of the transfer.

 

(2C)    

For the purposes of sub-paragraph (4) there is a relevant connection between the

 

first group and the second group if, at the time when the transferee ceases to be a

 

member of the second group, the company which is the principal company of that

 

group is under the control of—


 
 

S.C.B.  Standing Committee Proceedings: 28th June 2005            

31

 

Finance Bill, continued

 
 

(a)    

the company that is the principal company of the first group or, if that

 

group no longer exists, was the principal company of that group, when

 

the transferee ceased to be a member of it; or

 

(b)    

any person or persons who control the company mentioned in paragraph

 

(a) or who have had it under their control at any time in the period since

 

the transferee cease to be a member of the first group; or

 

(c)    

any person or persons who have, at any time in that period, had under

 

their control either—

 

(i)    

a company that would have been a person falling within

 

paragraph (b) if it had continued to exist, or

 

(ii)    

a company that would have been a person falling within this

 

paragraph (whether by reference to a company that would have

 

been a person falling within paragraph (b) or by reference to a

 

company or a series of companides falling within this provision).

 

(2D)    

The provisions of section 416(2) to (6) of the Taxes Act 1988 (meaning of

 

control) have effect for the purposes of sub-paragraph (5) as they have effect for

 

the purposes of Part 11 of that Act.

 


 

But a person carrying on a business of banking shall not be regarded for those

 

purposes as having control of a company by reason only of having, or of the

 

consequences of having exercised, any rights in respect of loan capital or debt

 

issued or incurre by the company for money lent by that person to the company

 

in the ordinary course of that business.’.

 

Mr Philip Hammond

 

Mr Richard Spring

 

Mr Mark Field

 

Mr Mark Francois

 

Mr David Ruffley

 

Not called  140

 

Schedule  7,  page  119,  line  12,  at end insert—

 

‘Degrouping: principal company becoming member of another group

 

24A      (1)    

Paragraphs 18 and 24 do not apply where a company ceases to be a

 

member of a group by reason only of the fact that the principal company

 

of the group becomes a member of another group (“the second group”).

 

      (2)    

But if, in a case where paragraphs 18 and 24 would have applied but for

 

sub-paragraph (1) above, after the assignment and before the end of the

 

period of six years after the date of the assignment—

 

(a)    

the transferee ceases to satisfy the condition that it is both a 75%

 

subsidiary and an effective 51% subsidiary of one or more

 

members of the second group (“the qualifying condition”), and

 

(b)    

at the time at which the transferee ceases to satisfy that condition,

 

the relevant loan relationship or derivative contract is held by the

 

transferee or another company in the same group,

 

              

this Schedule has effect as if the transferee, immediately after the

 

assignment to it of the relevant loan relationship or derivative contract,

 

had realised the loan relationship or derivative contract for its market

 

value at that time and immediately reacquired the asset at that value.

 

      (3)    

The adjustments required to be made in consequence of sub-paragraph

 

(2), by the transferee or a company to which the relevant loan relationship

 

or derivative contract has been subsequently assigned, in relation to the

 

period between—


 
 

S.C.B.  Standing Committee Proceedings: 28th June 2005            

32

 

Finance Bill, continued

 
 

(a)    

the assignment of the relevant loan relationship or derivative

 

contract to the transferee, and

 

(b)    

the transferee ceasing to satisfy the qualifying condition,

 

              

shall be made by bringing the aggregate net credit or debit into account

 

as if it had arisen immediately before the transferee ceased to satisfy the

 

qualifying condition.

 

      (4)    

For the purposes of section 82 of this Finance Act 1996 (Method of

 

bringing amounts into account) and paragraph 14 of Schedule 26 to the

 

Finance Act 2002 (Method of bringing amounts into account), credits or

 

debits brought into account by virtue of this paragraph take their

 

character from the purposes for which the relevant loan relationship or

 

derivative contract was held by the transferee immediately after the

 

assignment.’.

 

Schedule, as amended, Agreed to.

 

Clauses 41 and 42 Agreed to.

 


 

Further consideration adjourned - (Mr Tom Watson)

 

[Adjourned till Thursday at 9.15 a.m.


 
previous section contents
 
House of Commons home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Revised 29 June 2005