House of Commons
Session 2005 - 06|
Publications on the internet
Other Bills before Parliament
Arrangement of Clauses (Contents)
|Criminal Defence Service Bill [HL]|
These notes refer to the Criminal Defence Service Bill [HL] as brought from the House of Lords on 24th October 2005 [Bill 64].
CRIMINAL DEFENCE SERVICE BILL [HL]
1. These explanatory notes relate to the Criminal Defence Service Bill as brought from the House of Lords on 24th October 2005. They have been prepared by the Department for Constitutional Affairs in order to assist the reader of the Bill and to help inform debate on it. They do not form part of the Bill and have not been endorsed by Parliament.
2. These notes need to be read in conjunction with the Bill. They are not, and are not meant to be, a comprehensive description of the Bill. So where a clause or part of a clause does not seem to require an explanation or comment, none is given.
3. The Bill's provisions extend to England and Wales.
TERRITORIAL APPLICATION: WALES
4. The Bill has no effect on the National Assembly for Wales, and no other particular effect on Wales.
5. This Bill changes the arrangements for the grant of public funding for representation in criminal proceedings in England and Wales.
6. It provides for the power to grant rights to representation to be conferred on the Legal Services Commission (LSC) instead of the court. It introduces a test of financial eligibility for the grant of such funding and, in cases where eligibility exists, contributions based on means.
[Bill 64-EN] 54/1
7. The creation of the Criminal Defence Service (CDS) was part of the Government's fundamental reform of the legal aid system, as set out in the Access to Justice Act 1999, which received Royal Assent in July 1999.
8. The purpose of the CDS is to ensure access for individuals involved in criminal investigations or criminal proceedings to such advice, assistance and representation as the interests of justice require.
9. The CDS was implemented and managed by the LSC which was also created by the Access to Justice Act 1999. The General Criminal Contract is the framework within which the CDS operates under the management of the LSC. Solicitors are required to work within quality assured contracts to perform CDS functions.
10. The LSC is responsible for funding legal representation under the Criminal Defence Service. However, under the existing structure, it is the courts - and not the LSC or the Department for Constitutional Affairs (DCA) - which are responsible for granting the right to have funding.
11. The Bill enables the Lord Chancellor to confer power to grant rights to have funding on the LSC instead of the court.
12. The old criminal legal aid scheme established by the Legal Aid Act 1988 and abolished by the Access to Justice Act 1999 provided for means testing in deciding whether a person was eligible for representation, and, if so, in deciding whether the represented person should be required to make a contribution to the cost of representation. The Access to Justice Act 1999 did not include provisions parallel to these, other than the powers in section 17 for courts other than magistrates' courts to order a defendant to pay a contribution to defence costs.
13. Clause 1 deals with the grant of rights to representation, and enables regulations to be made to provide the LSC with the powers to grant and withdraw rights to representation.
14. Clause 2 provides for the rights to representation to be granted only where an individual satisfies financial eligibility criteria.
15. Clause 3 deals with the making of contribution orders where the financial eligibility criteria are satisfied.
16. Clause 4 makes consequential amendments to other legislation.
COMMENTARY ON CLAUSES
Clause 1: Grant of rights of representation
17. Clause 1 amends Schedule 3 to, and section 25 of, the Access to Justice Act 1999. That Schedule makes provision as to which bodies grant rights to representation, and the criteria on which such rights are granted.
18. Subsection (2) qualifies the general provision, in paragraph 2(1) of Schedule 3, conferring power on courts to grant rights to representation, with reference to new sub-paragraph (1A).
19. Subsection (3) inserts new sub-paragraph (1A) into paragraph 2 of Schedule 3. This provides that courts shall not be able to exercise the power where the LSC has the power to grant a right to representation, and in any other circumstances as may be prescribed.
20. Subsection (5) inserts new paragraph (5A) into paragraph 2 of Schedule 3, which provides that courts do not have the power to withdraw the rights to representation where the LSC has the power. Subsection (4) makes the necessary consequential amendment to paragraph 2(5) of Schedule 3.
21. Subsection (6) inserts new paragraph 2A into Schedule 3. This provides that regulations may provide for the LSC to grant the right to representation in criminal proceedings, other than those prescribed under section 12(2)(g) of the 1999 Act (in relation to which the LSC already grant rights to representation) and similarly that the LSC will also have the power to withdraw any right to representation where it has already been granted. This new paragraph allows for regulations to make any consequential amendments or repeal any enactment as the Lord Chancellor may consider appropriate.
22. Subsection (7) substitutes paragraph 3(2) and (3) of Schedule 3 (which relates to the grant of rights by the LSC) with new paragraph 3A so that the form of the grant may be prescribed in regulations. Paragraph 3A also provides that any transitional provisions may be made as the Lord Chancellor considers appropriate.
23. The effect of subsection (8) is to allow appeals, in all cases, against decisions to refuse to grant a right of representation.
24. Subsection (9) provides that regulations under paragraph 2A will be subject to the affirmative resolution procedure.
Clause 2: Rights to representation: financial eligibility
25. Clause 2 amends Schedule 3 to the 1999 Act to provide for financial eligibility.
26. Subsection (2) inserts paragraph 3B which provides that power to grant a right to representation can only be exercised where an individual's financial resources are such that the body considering the application is satisfied that he is eligible. This paragraph also provides that there is an obligation to withdraw the right where an individual's financial resources are not such that he is eligible to be granted a right to representation or that the individual failed to provide information about his resources.
27. Paragraph 3B also provides that regulations may allow exceptions to the provisions outlined in paragraph 26.
28. There are ancillary powers to include in regulations a requirement for individuals to provide supporting documents or information to support the application, and provision for the notification of decisions. There is also power to make transitional provisions.
29. Subsections (3) and (4) make consequential amendments to paragraph 5 of Schedule 3.
30. Subsection (5) provides that the first regulations under paragraph 3B will be subject to the affirmative resolution procedure.
31. Subsection (6) adds a definition of "relevant authority" to section 26 of the 1999 Act.
Clause 3: Rights to representation: contribution orders
32. Clause 3 provides for contribution orders to be made against an individual who has been granted public funding.
33. Subsection (2) qualifies the general prohibition in section 17(1) of the 1999 Act on requirements to contribute to the cost of representation, but also provides an exception to the existing power in section 17(2) for a court (other than a magistrates' court) to order a contribution to defence costs, in so far as a contribution order is made under the provisions introduced by this Bill.
34. Subsection (3) inserts new section 17A into the 1999 Act. This provides for regulations to provide for a prescribed body to order the individual to pay the full costs of representation or a contribution towards them. Regulations may also deal with the type of information that should be provided, how the costs of representation will be determined, how the contribution orders should be paid, interest on payments made after the time when representation is provided or any outstanding contributions, how an outstanding debt may be recovered - including the power to withdraw representation, power to vary or revoke contribution orders and provision of appeal against the making of a contribution order. Regulations must make provision for the repayment of any overpayment from a contribution order; they must further ensure that no defendant is subject to both a contribution order and Recovery of Defence Costs Order where the total value of both exceeds the total costs of his defence. Regulations may also allow for pilot schemes on contribution orders to be set up in prescribed areas and for a specified period.
35. Subsection (4) provides that the first regulations under new section 17A will be subject to the affirmative resolution procedure.
Clause 4: Consequential Amendments
36. Clause 4 makes consequential amendments to other legislation which are necessitated by the Bill. Subsection (1) amends the Attachment of Earnings Act 1971 so as to enable a magistrates' court to make an attachment of earnings order to secure the payment of any sum required to be paid under regulations made under the new section 17A(1) in the 1999 Act which is inserted by the Bill. A similar power already exists in relation to sums required to be paid under orders under section 17(2) of the 1999 Act.
37. Subsection (3) amends provisions in the Children and Young Persons Act 1969 and the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 which are listed in subsection (2), as a result of the re-introduction of means testing. These provisions restrict courts' powers to deal with a person who is unrepresented. Before the Access to Justice Act 1999 those four provisions which pre-dated that Act provided that the courts' powers were limited in respect of an unrepresented person, except where he had refused or failed to apply for legal aid, having had an opportunity to do so, or if legal aid had been refused because his financial resources made him ineligible. The second exception was removed by the 1999 Act. With the re-introduction of means testing the exception is now being restored to the pre-1999 Act provisions and added to the one post-1999 Act provision. An exception is also made where the right to representation is withdrawn because the person's financial resources make him ineligible.
FINANCIAL EFFECTS OF THE BILL
38. The Bill affects public expenditure. Both the measures which the Bill enables to be effected - the transfer of the grant of criminal funding to the LSC, and the introduction of means testing and payment of contributions - are expected to bring in identifiable savings. Detailed analysis of the effects of the Bill's enabling powers have been prepared and provided in a policy paper alongside the Bill. There is no expenditure expected to fall on the Consolidated Fund or the National Loans Fund.
39. Additional costs will be incurred in setting up the training and IT requirements of the scheme. Further analysis of the estimated costs that will be involved will be prepared when the detailed arrangements are finalised. There may be a small impact on the LSC's financial situation because of the requirements of adjustment regarding monitoring the scheme.
PUBLIC SERVICE MANPOWER
40. Where the power to grant rights of representation is conferred on the LSC, it is intended that the LSC will enter into an arrangement with Her Majesty's Court Service under which court officers in magistrates' courts will determine applications for grants. Decision making will therefore continue to be carried out in the courts as at present, but by court officers as an administrative function, and oversight and accountability for their decisions will lie with the LSC. There is no foreseen need for changes in the number of administrative staff required to carry out the means test.
SUMMARY OF THE REGULATORY IMPACT ASSESSMENT
41. An interim RIA based on the enabling powers within the Bill states that the Government's view is that the benefits of this legislation will outweigh the costs involved in the implementation and running of the new arrangements.
42. The Bill provides for regulations to set out the detailed arrangements of how the provisions in the Bill will operate, in particular the detail of the assessment of the financial resources of individuals and the determination of contribution orders. Final RIAs will be prepared when the details of the arrangements are prepared.
43. The substantive provisions of the Bill will come into force on a day or days appointed by the Lord Chancellor.
EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS
44. The Department takes the view that the provisions of the Bill relating to the grant of rights to representation (clause 1) do not raise any Convention issues, and that those relating to financial eligibility, contribution orders and consequential amendments (clauses 2, 3 and 4) are compatible with the Convention. In particular, under article 6(3)(c) of the Convention, the state is only required to provide free legal assistance to a person charged with an offence if he has not sufficient means to pay for legal assistance himself, and the interests of justice so require. Any regulations made under the powers conferred by clauses 2 and 3 will need to be made so as to comply with the rights conferred by article 6(3) of the Convention. The Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Bridget Prentice MP, has accordingly signed a certificate under section 19(1)(a) of the Human Rights Act 1998.
|© Parliamentary copyright 2005||Prepared: 25 October 2005|