House of Commons portcullis
House of Commons
Session 2005 - 06
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament


 
 

Report Stage Proceedings: 20th June 2006                

712

 

Children and Adoption Bill[ [], continued

 
 

‘Schedule (New Schedule 1) (which makes provision for default contact

 

arrangements) has effect.’.

 


 

Mr David Kidney

 

Not called  15

 

Page  2,  line  10  [Clause  1],  at end insert—

 

‘(5A)    

Any information or advice given under subsection (5)(b) about making

 

arrangements for contact with a child by means of mediation shall be given by an

 

accredited mediator.’.

 

Tim Loughton

 

Mrs Maria Miller

 

Mr Stewart Jackson

 

Jeremy Wright

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Not called  14

 

Page  2  [Clause  1],  leave out line 14.

 


 

Margaret Moran

 

Not called  21

 

Page  7,  line  22  [Clause  4],  at end insert—

 

‘(3A)    

In deciding whether a person had reasonable excuse for failing to comply with a

 

contact order, the court shall consider—

 

(a)    

the wishes and feelings of the child;

 

(b)    

any concerns about the safety of the child; and

 

(c)    

any concerns about the safety of any member of the child’s family.’.

 

Tim Loughton

 

Mrs Maria Miller

 

Mr Stewart Jackson

 

Jeremy Wright

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Not called  11

 

Page  7,  line  25  [Clause  4],  at end insert—

 

‘(4A)    

When considering whether to make an enforcement order, the Court shall have

 

regard to the principle that, subject to the welfare of the child, the court acts on

 

the presumption that a child’s welfare is best served through reasonable contact

 

with both his parents unless good reason to the contrary is shown.’.

 

Annette Brooke

 

Mark Williams

 

Not called  18

 

Page  7,  line  25  [Clause  4],  at end insert—


 
 

Report Stage Proceedings: 20th June 2006                

713

 

Children and Adoption Bill[ [], continued

 
 

‘( )    

When considering whether the person has a reasonable excuse the welfare of the

 

child is to be the court’s paramount consideration.’.

 


 

Tim Loughton

 

Mrs Maria Miller

 

Mr Stewart Jackson

 

Jeremy Wright

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Not selected  6

 

Page  8,  line  30  [Clause  4],  leave out ‘18’ and insert ‘16’.

 


 

Margaret Moran

 

Annette Brooke

 

Ms Sally Keeble

 

Ms Diana R. Johnson

 

Mr David Kidney

 

Not called  16

 

Page  9,  line  15  [Clause  4],  at end insert—

 

‘(5A)    

A court that proposes to make an enforcement order must order for the separate

 

representation of the child, unless it is satisfied that it is not necessary to do so in

 

order to safeguard his interests.’.

 


 

Tim Loughton

 

Mrs Maria Miller

 

Mr Stewart Jackson

 

Jeremy Wright

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Not called  10

 

Page  10,  line  26  [Clause  5],  leave out subsections (7) and (8).

 


 

Tim Loughton

 

Mrs Maria Miller

 

Mr Stewart Jackson

 

Jeremy Wright

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Not selected  7

 

Page  11,  line  17  [Clause  5],  leave out ‘18’ and insert ‘16’.

 



 
 

Report Stage Proceedings: 20th June 2006                

714

 

Children and Adoption Bill[ [], continued

 
 

Tim Loughton

 

Mrs Maria Miller

 

Mr Stewart Jackson

 

Jeremy Wright

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Not called  20

 

Page  12,  line  2,  leave out Clause 7.

 

Tim Loughton

 

Mrs Maria Miller

 

Mr Stewart Jackson

 

Jeremy Wright

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Not selected  13

 

Page  12,  line  14  [Clause  7],  leave out ‘cause’ and insert ‘reasonable grounds’.

 

Margaret Moran

 

Annette Brooke

 

Ms Sally Keeble

 

Ms Diana R. Johnson

 

Mr David Kidney

 

Not selected  17

 

Page  12,  line  17  [Clause  7],  at end insert—

 

‘(2A)    

Upon receiving a risk assessment the court should consider the need for the

 

separate representation of the child and his interests within the proceedings.’.

 

Annette Brooke

 

Mark Williams

 

Not called  19

 

Page  12,  line  20  [Clause  7],  after ‘child’, insert ‘and an assessment of the

 

differential impact upon the child of the options available to the court’.

 

Tim Loughton

 

Mrs Maria Miller

 

Mr Stewart Jackson

 

Jeremy Wright

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Not selected  8

 

Page  12,  line  20  [Clause  7],  at end insert—

 

‘(4)    

All risk assessments undertaken pursuant to subsection (2) shall proceed on the

 

presumption that the child’s interests are best served through reasonable contact

 

with both his parents unless a good reason to the contrary is shown.

 

(5)    

When deciding whether there is reason to suspect that a child is at risk of harm,

 

an officer of the service or a Welsh proceedings officer may only make a risk

 

assessment where he has reasonable grounds to suspect that there is a significant

 

risk of significant harm.

 

(6)    

An officer of the service or a Welsh proceedings officer may only make a risk

 

assessment where he has reasonable grounds to suspect that the significant risk

 

involves a risk—

 

(a)    

to the child’s physical safety, or

 

(b)    

of sexual abuse.

 

(7)    

In all other circumstances than those outlined in subsections (5) and (6), the

 

Officer of the Service or a Welsh proceedings officer shall not undertake a risk

 

assessment except where directed to do so by a court.


 
 

Report Stage Proceedings: 20th June 2006                

715

 

Children and Adoption Bill[ [], continued

 
 

(8)    

In any risk assessment based upon the likelihood of recurrence of previous risks

 

it shall be a requirement that no reliance is placed upon previous events or

 

previous risks in the absence of a finding of fact that those events or risks actually

 

occurred.’.

 


 

Tim Loughton

 

Mrs Maria Miller

 

Mr Stewart Jackson

 

Jeremy Wright

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Not called  2

 

Page  13,  line  21  [Clause  9],  leave out subsection (3) and insert—

 

‘(3)    

Before making an order in the case of a country or territory which is a Convention

 

country, the Secretary of State shall consult the Hague Conference.’.

 

Tim Loughton

 

Mrs Maria Miller

 

Mr Stewart Jackson

 

Jeremy Wright

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Not called  1

 

Page  13,  line  29  [Clause  9],  at end insert—

 

‘(c)    

the central authority in the country or territory to which restrictions are to

 

apply.’.

 

Tim Loughton

 

Mrs Maria Miller

 

Mr Stewart Jackson

 

Jeremy Wright

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Not selected  3

 

Page  13,  line  33  [Clause  9],  after ‘country’, insert ‘, which should include an

 

explanation of why the practices in the relevant country or territory have led him to

 

believe that it would be contrary to public policy to further the bringing of children into

 

the United Kingdom in the cases mentioned in subsection (2).’.

 

Tim Loughton

 

Mrs Maria Miller

 

Mr Stewart Jackson

 

Jeremy Wright

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Not called  22

 

Page  13,  line  33  [Clause  9],  at end insert ‘to include regular reviews on why that

 

declaration should still apply’.

 

Tim Loughton

 

Mrs Maria Miller

 

Mr Stewart Jackson

 

Jeremy Wright

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Not called  4

 

Page  13,  line  38  [Clause  9],  at end insert—


 
 

Report Stage Proceedings: 20th June 2006                

716

 

Children and Adoption Bill[ [], continued

 
 

‘(9A)    

The Secretary of State must establish an appeals procedure to consider appeals

 

against the decision to impose special restrictions on adoptions from abroad.’.

 


 

Tim Loughton

 

Mrs Maria Miller

 

Mr Stewart Jackson

 

Jeremy Wright

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Not called  23

 

Page  14,  line  17  [Clause  10],  at end insert ‘, and

 

(c)    

prescribed organisations involved in adoption.’.

 


 

Tim Loughton

 

Mrs Maria Miller

 

Mr Stewart Jackson

 

Jeremy Wright

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Not selected  24

 

Page  16,  line  22  [Clause  13],  at end insert ‘and in so doing must have regard to the

 

financial circumstances of the prospective adopter.’.

 

Tim Loughton

 

Mrs Maria Miller

 

Mr Stewart Jackson

 

Jeremy Wright

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Not selected  9

 

Page  16,  line  27  [Clause  13],  at end insert—

 

‘(c)    

provide a detailed breakdown of what costs have been borne to give rise

 

to the fee.’.

 


 

Tim Loughton

 

Mrs Maria Miller

 

Mr Stewart Jackson

 

Jeremy Wright

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Not called  5

 

Page  17,  line  28  [Clause  16],  leave out from ‘(2)’ to ‘House’ in line 29 and insert

 

‘shall not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by

 

a resolution of, each’.


 
 

Report Stage Proceedings: 20th June 2006                

717

 

Children and Adoption Bill[ [], continued

 
 

Tim Loughton

 

Mrs Maria Miller

 

Mr Stewart Jackson

 

Jeremy Wright

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Not selected  12

 

Page  17,  line  36  [Clause  17],  leave out ‘Children and’ and insert ‘Child Contact

 

and Intercountry’.

 


 

New Schedule

 

Annette Brooke

 

Mark Williams

 

Not called  ns1

 

To move the following Schedule:—

 

‘Default contact arrangements

 

1    (1)  

This Schedule applies where two persons having parental responsibility for a

 

child under the age of 14 years are at the commencement of this Act living or

 

thereafter commence to live in separate households from each other.

 

      (2)  

In this Schedule the “resident parent” means that person with parental

 

responsibility for a child specified under sub-paragraph (1) who is principally

 

resident in the same household as the child; the “non-resident parent” shall

 

mean the other person, with whom the child does not reside.

 

      (3)  

The provisions of this Schedule are entirely without prejudice to the

 

responsibility of the resident and non-resident parents in any case to which this

 

Schedule applies to make such agreed arrangements for contact with the child

 

as they may decide are appropriate in the child’s best interests.

 

      (4)  

In any case to which this Schedule applies in it shall be the responsibility of

 

both the resident and the non-resident parents—

 

(a)    

to endeavour to reach agreement as to such arrangements for contact

 

or,

 

(b)    

if they are to give effect to the default contact arrangements set out in

 

paragraph 4 below, to endeavour—

 

(i)    

to ensure that the default contact arrangements operate

 

smoothly;

 

(ii)    

to reach agreement as to the detailed implementation of the

 

default contact arrangements; and

 

(iii)    

to reach agreement as to such variations to the default contact

 

arrangements with regard to dates, times and delivery and

 

collection arrangements as may be appropriate to suit the

 

circumstances and commitments of the child, any sibling of

 

the child, the resident parent and the non-resident parent.

 

      (5)  

On any application to a court for contact with any child the way in which the

 

resident and non-resident parent have each discharged the responsibility set

 

out in paragraph 1(4) shall be a circumstance which it shall be relevant for the

 

court to consider.

 

2          

In any case where the resident parent and the non-resident parent commence

 

living in separate households after the commencement of this Act they shall be

 

deemed to have agreed upon such separation to the arrangements for contact

 

between the child and the non-resident parent set out in paragraph 4 below


 
 

Report Stage Proceedings: 20th June 2006                

718

 

Children and Adoption Bill[ [], continued

 
 

(“the default contact arrangements”) and such arrangements shall be put into

 

effect from the date of such separation unless and until either—

 

(a)    

the resident parent and the non-resident parent have agreed alternative

 

arrangements for such contact; or

 

(b)    

a court otherwise orders.

 

3          

In any case where the resident parent and the non-resident parent are already

 

living in separate households at the commencement of this Act they shall be

 

deemed to have agreed at the date of such commencement to the arrangements

 

for contact betwen the child and the non-resident parent set out in paragraph 4

 

below (“the default contact arrangements”) and such arrangements shall be put

 

into effect unless and until either—

 

(a)    

the resident parent and the non-resident parent have agreed alternative

 

arrangements for such contact; or

 

(b)    

a court otherwise orders.

 

4          

The default contact arrangements to which paragraphs 2 and 3 above refer shall

 

be as follows—

 

      (1)  

In the case of an infant under one year old, the child shall visit the non-resident

 

parent every Sunday between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.; and the resident and non-

 

resident parents shall share responsibility for transport of the child between

 

their homes.

 

      (2)  

In the case of any child who has attained the age of one year but is not yet in

 

full-time education, the child shall—

 

(a)    

stay with the non-resident parent on alternate weekends from 10 a.m.

 

on Saturday until 5 p.m. on Sunday;

 

(b)    

visit the non-resident parent from 2 p.m. until 5 p.m. every

 

Wednesday;

 

(c)    

stay with the non-resident parent for seven weeks’ holiday per year, on

 

dates to be agreed between the resident and non-resident parents or, in

 

default of such an agreement, determined by a court; and

 

(d)    

the resident and non-resident parents shall share responsibility for

 

transport of the child between their homes.

 

      (3)  

In the case of any child in full-time education who has not yet attained the age

 

of fourteen years, the child shall—

 

(a)    

stay with the non-resident parent on alternate weekends from after the

 

child finishes school on Friday until 6 p.m. on Sunday;

 

(b)    

visit the non-resident parent from 4 p.m. until 6 p.m. every

 

Wednesday;

 

(c)    

stay with the non-resident parent for seven weeks’ holiday per year, of

 

which at least ten days shall be in the Christmas school holidays, ten

 

days shall be in the Easter school holidays; and the balance in the

 

summer school holidays, the precise dates to be agreed between the

 

resident and non-resident parents or, in default of such agreements,

 

determined by a court; and

 

(d)    

the resident and non-resident parents shall share responsibility for

 

transport of the child between their homes and/or the child’s school.

 

5          

This Schedule shall not apply in circumstances where allegations of child

 

abuse are made in such form as the Secretary of State may by order prescribe.’.

 

Bill read the third time on division and passed with an Amendment.

 


 
previous section contents
 
House of Commons home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Revised 21 June 2006